reply to post by jrmcleod
I understand your stance, but the argument remains:
If the Colonies were considered a “part of the nation” enough to be taxed, then they were national enough to make a decision on their own, and
being that they were a colony thousands of miles from the rest of the world, the weight of the rest of the people under King James wouldn’t have
counted in the affairs of those in the Americas. If they weren’t considered a part of the nation any longer by residing outside of the
“kingdom”, then the King’s arm no longer had any reign over them, and so their declaration of independence was still sound.
This sort of debate is never ending, full of so many catch-22s that it’ll have your brain hurting, which is why nearly two and a half centuries
later, lawyers are still having these debates. To be honest, it doesn’t really matter at this point, as neither nation is likely to survive the
next hundred years…. at least not in their present forms.
We've built a mighty alliance with our previous mother, and unfortunately, that relationship has become toxic.
edit on 20-10-2011 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)