Photography of ATS Members, page 64
Pages: <<  61    62    63    64    65    66    67  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times


reply posted on 25-8-2008 @ 05:32 PM by nuts!
reply to post by tep200377



Congratulations, she is absolutely beautiful.
My best wishes to you.


reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 04:13 AM by Azador
Haha the irony



reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 02:03 PM by Hellmutt
reply to post by asala



Those were very nice, Asala! I wish I could applaud you. I starred you instead.


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 06:35 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Azador



ATS and BTS images are limited to 600 pixels width.

While I was writing this post I decided to make a little investigation of how to post the images with the right size for the page but keeping it "clickable", and this is what I found.

1 - Click on the "hyperlink" button, to post a link.
2 - When it asks for a name type something, I usually use 'zzzzz' or 'xxxx'.
3 - When it asks for the URL paste or type the image URL.
4 - Back on the text box where you are writing your post, select the text you entered (the 'zzzzz' or 'xxxx' in the above example) and click on the "image" button. When it asks for the URL type or paste the URL for the image.
5 - Now replace the [‍img] and [‍/img] tags with [‍ats=600x???] and [‍/ats], where ??? is the height of your image proportional to the 600 pixels width.

It would look like this:
[‍url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8823/img0155jv9.jpg]
[‍ats=600x450]http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8823/img0155jv9.jpg[‍/ats][‍/url]

for a result like this.



It may be a little confusing, but it works.

Edited for spelling.

[edit on 7/9/2008 by ArMaP]


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 07:02 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Azador



What do you mean by that?

There should not be any difference when compared with the original photo, digital copies are exact copies, unless the images are resized or compressed.


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 09:16 AM by funny_pom

link

Perth city skyline, from the east.
Done in HDR format.


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 11:56 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Azador



In Photobucket, files with more than 1MB are automatically reduced, as are those with more than 1024x768, could it be that the reason?

I have also seen some people saying that some ISPs reduce the quality of the images before sending them to the clients, but as my ISP does not do that I have no way of knowing if it's true or not.


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 02:55 AM by Azador
reply to post by ArMaP



I usually keep my posted pics around the 600kb mark.It could be the isp thing ill ask my techgeek mate who fiddles with computers for a living.All i know is that when i compress the pic on my comp it still looks alright but when i upload them they seem to lose some of their range.
Pages: <<  61    62    63    64    65    66    67  >>    ^^TOP^^



"The Seeker" Completed my painting, 8 months in the making.
  Posted 19 days ago with 30 member flags
PTSD: The Painting
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
1littlewolf\'s Nature and Wildlife Photography
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags
Some drawings I did.
  Posted 15 days ago with 8 member flags
Not trying to start a flamewar...
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
my art
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Graffiti Love or hate it
  Posted 8 days ago with 2 member flags