It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Photography of ATS Members

page: 64
38
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 25 2008 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by tep200377
 


Congratulations, she is absolutely beautiful.
My best wishes to you.




posted on Aug, 31 2008 @ 03:34 AM
link   
These posters are up everywhere in Denmark. The text written at the top (black on yellow) translates to: "Congratulations with the smoking ban"



Someone is apparently very angry. Or extremely bored... Whether it is because of the smoking ban or not, I don't know.




posted on Aug, 31 2008 @ 04:13 AM
link   
Haha the irony



posted on Sep, 2 2008 @ 06:40 PM
link   
Capturing the Sun,







posted on Sep, 3 2008 @ 01:18 AM
link   
Very nice Asala.
Thats quite eerie.Was it sunrise?



posted on Sep, 3 2008 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by asala
 


Those were very nice, Asala! I wish I could applaud you. I starred you instead.



posted on Sep, 4 2008 @ 12:55 AM
link   


HDRi outside my front door.



and in my living room



posted on Sep, 4 2008 @ 01:05 AM
link   
Here is a flower in Bali - it was taken about 2 years ago with a Nikon D70.




posted on Sep, 4 2008 @ 01:21 AM
link   
Here is the view from Hotel Beacon on Broadway in NY. It was taken from a corner suite on the 21st floor & was a 30-sec exposure at f/22.




posted on Sep, 6 2008 @ 01:13 PM
link   
Burperup, 30 minutes ago. Click for full view.





posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 04:18 AM
link   
Yesterday on the way home



Still getting a bit chopped off
I give up


[edit on 7-9-2008 by Azador]



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 06:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Azador
 


ATS and BTS images are limited to 600 pixels width.

While I was writing this post I decided to make a little investigation of how to post the images with the right size for the page but keeping it "clickable", and this is what I found.

1 - Click on the "hyperlink" button, to post a link.
2 - When it asks for a name type something, I usually use 'zzzzz' or 'xxxx'.
3 - When it asks for the URL paste or type the image URL.
4 - Back on the text box where you are writing your post, select the text you entered (the 'zzzzz' or 'xxxx' in the above example) and click on the "image" button. When it asks for the URL type or paste the URL for the image.
5 - Now replace the [‍img] and [‍/img] tags with [‍ats=600x???] and [‍/ats], where ??? is the height of your image proportional to the 600 pixels width.

It would look like this:

[‍url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8823/img0155jv9.jpg]
[‍ats=600x450]http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8823/img0155jv9.jpg[‍/ats][‍/url]

for a result like this.



It may be a little confusing, but it works.


Edited for spelling.


[edit on 7/9/2008 by ArMaP]



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 06:52 AM
link   
Thank you Armap that helps a bit(i think?).
Now if you could teach me the magic of how to stop an image of losing its lustre when putting it on the web haha.



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 07:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Azador
 


What do you mean by that?

There should not be any difference when compared with the original photo, digital copies are exact copies, unless the images are resized or compressed.



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 07:02 AM
link   
Ah ill try again tomorrow after a moi.

[edit on 7-9-2008 by Azador]



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 07:06 AM
link   


What do you mean by that?


It might be just me but it seems after i upload a picture to say photobucket it looks a little duller.Probably just my imagination....

[edit on 7-9-2008 by Azador]



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 09:16 AM
link   

link

Perth city skyline, from the east.
Done in HDR format.



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Azador
 


In Photobucket, files with more than 1MB are automatically reduced, as are those with more than 1024x768, could it be that the reason?

I have also seen some people saying that some ISPs reduce the quality of the images before sending them to the clients, but as my ISP does not do that I have no way of knowing if it's true or not.



posted on Sep, 7 2008 @ 01:35 PM
link   
This one was taken after the other one, but zoomed out. Click for full view.





posted on Sep, 8 2008 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


I usually keep my posted pics around the 600kb mark.It could be the isp thing ill ask my techgeek mate who fiddles with computers for a living.All i know is that when i compress the pic on my comp it still looks alright but when i upload them they seem to lose some of their range.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 61  62  63    65  66  67 >>

log in

join