It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Huge Tower (5 Km high) in Hellas Planitia Region on Mars!

page: 1
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+9 more 
posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:33 AM
link   
The Tower of Devil on Mars? What is this amazing structure that lies on Hellas Planitia Region on Mars? Seems like the DEVILS TOWER in Wyoming, it is symmetrical, (manmade?), and it is High, very high: 5 km at least! And it's real! No artifact compression. The shadows, day/night, confirm that this amazing structure is real.






The video.


What NASA said about this?



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:41 AM
link   
Truly awesome. How would that come to be?

As for it being manmade, I highly doubt it.

5 Km high WTF?!?!


+22 more 
posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
The Tower of Devil on Mars? What is this amazing structure that lies on Hellas Planitia Region on Mars?


...or more exactly, found on GOOGLE.




Originally posted by Arken
What NASA said about this?


Did you go and look at the original images from Mars?
Did the author of the video bother to go and look at the original images from Mars?
Nope.
Given the huge number of patching artifacts that we've seen over the years from google earth (and moon etc..) from patching images together, this new one is worth NOTHING until somebody can find it on an original NASA image.



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 

5km would suggest some huge crustal displacement or destruction
this is weird as
how could it be symetrical..the pictures dont look like it, and if it is that would infer inteligent design



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:00 AM
link   
could be the inspiration fo rthe Burj Khalifa

though that building is only 828m/2717 ft high

can't wait to stay there!



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:34 AM
link   
Well, there ya go!



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:35 AM
link   
Who gonna debunk this.

It's gotta be natural formation right?


+2 more 
posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by VirgoGuy
Who gonna debunk this.
It's gotta be natural formation right?



As I said above, I'm going with computer generated stiching artifact, of which we've seen many over the years on google earth.
I particularly wasnt impressed by the way it "pops up" in the video once a certain resolution was reached.
(16 seconds into the video) Just like objects in some computer games.


+5 more 
posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:42 AM
link   
How do we know this isnt a glitch in the 3D model?

You do know this is 3D model right?


+24 more 
posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:53 AM
link   
why do, no offense, "old people" always assume computers are infallible?

this is so obviously just some glitch. its embarrassing to waste everyones time(yours included) on such ignorant fantasy.

this reminds me of richard c hoagland going on and on about the freaking pixels on old digital photos of mars being crops and buildings and ruins and whatever the hell else he sees when hes tripping balls and looking at those things.


either get more versed in the ways of how computers ACTUALLY WORK, or stop jumping to fantastic conclusions before asking for qualified opinion.

most blinking lights in the sky are either planes or stars.
pointing to a helicopter and screaming "its an angel!" wont make it true.



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 04:54 AM
link   
I'm going to guess that when someone or some piece of software was laying down the terrain mesh for this spot 5000 meters was accidentally input instead of 500 meters or 50 meters. So, instead of either a minor bump or a large hill, you get what looks like an impossible tower.

As the other poster said, lets see this area on the photographic maps of Mars before we jump to conclusions. Google Maps meant to be used as a resource, but isn't there to be used for making scientific discoveries. It's very, very far from being a flawless font of raw data. In fact it's nothing of the sort.



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 06:01 AM
link   
Yeah sure, its just a glitch no need to verify from the originals. /sarcasm

Lets check the originals before reaching conclusions please.



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 06:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


It's Mount Zeus!

Arthur C. Clarke almost got it right, but it hit Mars instead of Europa.
And it didn't come from Jupiters' core obviously



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 07:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by BIGPoJo
Yeah sure, its just a glitch no need to verify from the originals. /sarcasm

Lets check the originals before reaching conclusions please.

No need, we'll just assume NASA "fixed" the originals



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
reply to post by roughycannon
 


Shadows! Night/Day... confirm....



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:26 AM
link   
reply to post by BohemianBrim
 




most blinking lights in the sky are either planes or stars.


Right.
Other are not........



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


reminds me of the spire they found on the moon (supposedly ound anyways).

monolith on mars, phobos, the moon, here on earth.

Yup, nothing to see here, move along... nothing to see move along..

/xcathdra snags his go bag
/hits the lights
/heads to Wyomming for a road trip.

It does look out of place. How wide is the base? looks narrow to support something that tall. Its almost like the ground sank and one part did not.
edit on 19-10-2011 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


Any 3D program can simulate lighting, its what they do, as well as terrain map, model, skin, texturize, etc...

Why would the person that put this video up call this spike a Great Statue of (a) Pharaoh?



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Illustronic
 


My guess would be that it looks like a monolith, just like what was built in ancient Egypt



posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 08:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


Night and day is simulated, as well as the shadow effects.

I know you won't believe me so open up google earth and go to say the Eiffel tower, make sure 3D buildings is turned on and you will see that when you use the sunlight feature, it does the same thing.




top topics



 
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join