It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Xtrozero
Nope, you just retire and the company goes on.
You've taken your just share and have no need of more, so go enjoy it. If, god forbid, your wealth drops to a mere $900,000,000.00, why then you can jump back in and earn some more to top it off again.
What's wrong with that?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Xtrozero
Nope, you just retire and the company goes on.
You've taken your just share and have no need of more, so go enjoy it. If, god forbid, your wealth drops to a mere $900,000,000.00, why then you can jump back in and earn some more to top it off again.
What's wrong with that?
1. What skills do you have?
2. Can you get new skills to fit the future job market.
3. Why should a company hire you?
4. Are you willing to move to any place that would provide a job?
5. Are you willing to work your way back up with new skills?
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by SeleneLux
There really are just 1% that hold the majority of wealth and power. When it is that far out of proportion then these people did not make this money in any ethical or moral way and are criminals that are protected because the massive sums of wealth make them above the law.
So, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg etc all made their money in unethical or immoral ways? I'll give you Zuckerberg and his winklevossing facebook and ignoring privacy concerns but, even then, it isn't immoral or unethical. Just sleazy.
Explain how Steve Jobs, Brin, Page etc made their money in an unethical or immoral manner.
Originally posted by apacheman
When your individual right to wealth accumulation forces others to do without, you are infringing upon their individual rights of survival.
Originally posted by apacheman
Where is your sense of responsibility and duty to the nation?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by gwydionblack
Individual rights stop where they conflict with the rights of others.
I can claim a right to sex, but that doesn't justify rape.
I still fail to see where anyone derives a "right" to unlimited wealth from, and so far no one has offered a shred of evidence supporting it.
When your individual right to wealth accumulation forces others to do without, you are infringing upon their individual rights of survival.
Where is your sense of responsibility and duty to the nation?
Should we dictate what kind of car you can drive, how big of house you can live in, what foods you eat?
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by Indigo5
by making money, under the system that currently exists, how are they immoral or unethical?
A simple question.
Bernie Madoff ran an illegal ponzi scheme. That's how he was immoral an unethical.
What about the others? Are the Walton family all immoral and unethical?
Paris Hilton was mentioned earlier. she's a child born unto wealth. She might be a bird brained do nothing but she was born with money. How is that immoral or unethical?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Xtrozero
But that isn't how most corporations work: they buy a company that employed 20,000 people, fire 10K, move 8K jobs overseas, and the average wages are 18K a year. The money saved is then given in tax-sheltered bonuses that are spent in foreign countries, or used to pay lobbyists to enact schemes that enable them to access markets unfairly and avoid paying taxes or taking responsibility for the environmental damage they do.