It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The biggest negative to a flat tax is it will basically kill charitable donations.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
I'm having a hard time here understanding the mentality of people. Most of my posts are long on here, but I am going to try to make this as short as I can so that people can enlighten myself (and others) as to their thinking.
I hear many people on ATS, around the globe, and in the Occupy Wall Street movements advocate more taxes for the rich and some even go so far as to say a "redistribution of wealth". I struggle to find where the belief in this comes from. Does it only come from people who don't have wealth or is it more wide spread?
Why should the rich be charged any more in taxes, simply because they make more money?
1. Why do the super-rich continue to build wealth long after every conceivable need for now and two, three and more generations into the future has been met?
2. From where do people derive the right to unlimited wealth?
3. Why isn't the desire for excessive wealth seen as what it is, an addiction, and treated as such?
4. Why can't the super-rich say enough is enough and gracefully retire when they've reached, say a billion dollars in wealth?
5. Why isn't there a global cap on individual wealth?
Originally posted by apacheman
Then he retires and enjoys life.
Originally posted by apacheman
Any income is taxed at 100% when the wealth has reached a billion dollars.
Originally posted by apacheman
From where do you derive a right to unlimited wealth?
Won't someone please at least attempt to rationally answer that question?
Originally posted by gwydionblack
If, for instance, people weren't so massively addicted to entertainment and sports media, athletes and actors would not make so much money. Nobody is out there demanding that actors and athletes get paid less, but they would gladly advocate that teachers and private doctors gets paid more, not understanding that there is a level of payout that needs to be balanced using priorities.
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by wildtimes
I wasn't saying that our society, to a person, is this way. I was merely pointing out that this is a major problem. I'd be willing to be that, for every person like your husband, there are 5 who are unwilling to compromise and take the same job your husband took. The world needs more people who put their pride on the back burner when it comes to survival.
you, and your husband, are example of how we should all be