It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My sarcasm detector registers a zero, though it's not always 100% accurate
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
For my future sanity, was the man there or not or are you being sarcastic here?
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
Originally posted by JimOberg
reply to post by nv4711
Terrific piece of original scholarship. I stand corrected and accept this evidence that Armstrong was there.
Just got back to this topic...
For my future sanity, was the man there or not or are you being sarcastic here?
Thanks.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
My sarcasm detector registers a zero, though it's not always 100% accurate
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
For my future sanity, was the man there or not or are you being sarcastic here?
Did you read the article by Jason Colavito? What's not to like?
Originally posted by JimOberg
No, the evidence he was on a trip to the Andes is solid -- but the report he visit an ancient astronaut technology cave site appears to be a total fabrication.
This does not sound like the description of a man that would get involved with 'fringe' pursuits.
I believe he must have had some other insights which led him to believe, initially, that Eric Von Daniken might actually know something that corresponds to what he knew.
he was unaware of von Däniken’s wild claims about them or Hall’s alternative theories. It took only a day’s exploration at Cueva de los Tayos to determine two essential facts. First, there was no metal library where von Däniken had claimed. Second, in Armstrong’s own words: “It was the conclusion of our expedition group that they [the caves] were natural formations.”
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Did you read the article by Jason Colavito? What's not to like?
However Von Daniken would not have arranged a trip anywhere like that unless he actually thought he would find something! Either Von Daniken 'bamboozled' Armstrong, which is unlikely or there was another reason!
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Did you read the article by Jason Colavito? What's not to like?
However Von Daniken would not have arranged a trip anywhere like that unless he actually thought he would find something! Either Von Daniken 'bamboozled' Armstrong, which is unlikely or there was another reason!
In other words, you DIDN'T read the article by Jason Colavito, or if you did, you failed to comprehend it.
Maybe you should re-read it more carefully.
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Did you read the article by Jason Colavito? What's not to like?
However Von Daniken would not have arranged a trip anywhere like that unless he actually thought he would find something! Either Von Daniken 'bamboozled' Armstrong, which is unlikely or there was another reason!
In other words, you DIDN'T read the article by Jason Colavito, or if you did, you failed to comprehend it.
Maybe you should re-read it more carefully.
I did read it... (not that I'm sure when Jason Colavito became a credible source, nor am I sure why it was the word of this person which led Jim O Berg to believe that the trip happened in the first place which is why I thought he was being sarcastic) But it was impossible for Armstrong to have NOT known about Von Daniken or how he got his money. Von Daniken was famous then and not as an 'academic' as the poster before you posited.
The caves, were always going to be 'natural', you and I both know that. But he went in the first place!
edit on 18-11-2012 by Loopdaloop because: spelling (terrible)
Stan Hall said. "The name of Prince Charles, who had recently received a degree in archaeology, was proposed, but I knew Neil Armstrong had Scottish connections. My mother was an Armstrong and via another Armstrong in Langholm, where Neil Armstrong had been made an honorary citizen, I made contact. Months later, I got a reply that Neil Armstrong was willing to join us on this mission.
Dang, this is the ATS hive-mind at its cosmic best.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Big thank-yous to everyone who has been doing the digging and finding NEW stuff related to this myth.
Those of us who have followed along for the ride have attained a new level of realistic comprehension of the story BEHIND the myth.
Dang, this is the ATS hive-mind at its cosmic best.
Hats off, colleagues and friends. Let's make this a habit and set some standards.
Dang.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by JimOberg
Big thank-yous to everyone who has been doing the digging and finding NEW stuff related to this myth.
Those of us who have followed along for the ride have attained a new level of realistic comprehension of the story BEHIND the myth.
Dang, this is the ATS hive-mind at its cosmic best.
Hats off, colleagues and friends. Let's make this a habit and set some standards.
Dang.
Jim, while it's always nice when you heap merit on those who have conducted some measure of successful research, you are going over the here with your above comments. Threads such as this one which eventually show cohesiveness in member achievements is a rarity. The majority of threads is about boring subjects started by people who have no concept of how to conduct proper research and the high level of gullibility reigns supreme. Like you, I applaud the conclusion of this thread and do wish we had more such as this one. But we know videos from YouTube rule and believers outrank us.
After all, we had to plow through 9 pages riddled with questionable thinking until nv4711 lit the torch and now we could see the light at the end of the tunnel. As you so criticized one of the typical "contributors": "And the knee-jerk gullibility you share with so many other people..."
I included a photo of Neil that did not resemble the photo of the alleged Neil while on the expedition. What gives?
Lastly, was the article verified by independent researchers? It seems to have been accepted without questioning.
Is there a confirmation in Neil's private or public papers?
edit on 20-11-2012 by The Shrike because: To correct format.edit on 20-11-2012 by The Shrike because: To add comment.
Originally posted by nv4711
Your big mistake is that you seem to believe that Daeniken was on the 1976 expedition to Cueva de los Tayos. He wasn't. The expedition organized by Stanley Hall was a joint british-equadorian venture, consisting of over 100 people, British and Equadorian military, British cavers and botanical and zoological experts.
How Armstrong got involved?
Stan Hall said. "The name of Prince Charles, who had recently received a degree in archaeology, was proposed, but I knew Neil Armstrong had Scottish connections. My mother was an Armstrong and via another Armstrong in Langholm, where Neil Armstrong had been made an honorary citizen, I made contact. Months later, I got a reply that Neil Armstrong was willing to join us on this mission.
The expedition cartographed the cave and cataloged 50 new plant and animal species they found in the cave system.
Armstrong never met Daeniken nor was he in any way endorsing him . In fact, in a letter dated February 24, 1977, Armstrong wrote to Daeniken, complaining: " It has been brought to my attention„ that you had various articles published in magazines in Germany and Argentina, connecting the expedition with your theories. Pictures have been published showing me at the Tayos cave. I have never been interviewed or questioned by any publication, concerning the expedition. In Ecuador, I was asked whether the caves showed any signs of a higher civilization, and I said "No". (translated back into English by me from an article in the German magazine "Der Spiegel", 1978).
So, in short, Armstrong didn't know Daeniken, never met him and was "not amused" that Daeniken was trying to connect him and the 1976 expedition with his "theories".
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
snip
From my reading of this thread, the 'point' was to discuss the credibility of astronauts, their beliefs when it comes to 'ufos' or life on other words and how this impacts upon their said 'credibility' so for some who feel that they have a conclusion, I would disagree.
Originally posted by Loopdaloop
From my reading of this thread, the 'point' was to discuss the credibility of astronauts, their beliefs when it comes to 'ufos' or life on other words and how this impacts upon their said 'credibility' so for some who feel that they have a conclusion, I would disagree.
I'm interested to know how the formula to calculate validity of source here as it is strange that an blog by 'Jason Colavito' is considered a 'valid source' whereas 'Phillip Coppens' is not.
Similarly nv4711 does not provide a reference for his quote or a link to the original article that he 'translated' from 'das spiegal', which is in itself a magazine that is known for its distortion, manipulation and disinformation as opposed to real analysis. Moreover I am astounded that this particular magazine is considered a valid anything, especially considering its utilisation by "ex" nazi Rudolph Augstein for nazi-symphasing propaganda, whilst wearing the mask of a liberal. It was Augstein who famously attempting to espouse Rudolph Hess of his wrongdoing as well as claimed that Hitler might not have known about the gas chambers and thus what was happening to the Jews (!) (Der Spiegel, 4/1995, Seite 41).
You, I and the dog knew there nothing was going to be found in those caves and if Armstrong did write that, it would be of no surprise. I do however sincerely doubt Armstrong did not know why Stan Hall decided to arrange a trip there in the first place (or the EvD link) YET:
He still went.
Originally posted by FuriousKitty
reply to post by Cosmic911
I myself do not believe they made contact with ET but i do believe they believe in such things.
FK