These epiphanies are principles that I have come to understand through direct cognition; visual impressions and intuitive knowingness of what they mean during spiritual experiences. I have had many people who know me personally, suggest that I hold workshop's.

However:
1. I cant charge. (I will explain later why this is)
2. In a workshop setting some people are not always ready to delve into the facets of these bodies at the same pace even though they may all be interested, each individual must take the information in at a frequency that is manageable for them.
3. If an individual finds that a certain notion is to wacky then they will likely (and it is advised to) cease entertaining the further articulation of the epiphanies that centre on the notion. Once you understand a concept completely you cannot remove it from your mind, you can only unlearn the notion that it is the truth, one achieves this by learning something that is closer to truth which nullifies the principles previously learnt.

When potent content is written and presented the author has the responsibility to not entice the reader to wade through concepts that are not of their current level of understanding or relevant, in order to get to something of interest that they can fathom. As such the author who writes responsibly indicate the notions of which will be presented in a given topic so the reader may discern carefully as to whether they are up for the dive.

Having said the above I may now lay forth a couple of pertinent notions:

First why Iwill\ not charge for my epiphenomia. I feel unable to concede to sophism with these epiphanies i.e. sophists are people who place a condition of pay before you receive spiritual/consciousness enhancing related services. Rather than trust that their services will be rewarded by the gratitude and supportive service of people who benefit from them. This is the law of unconditional love. Service unto others without expectations, the effect of such attitude if not immediately, will eventually be met with the inverse of the connotation of selfless service that is usually interpreted by the statement. However its a double negative; if one has no expectations it also means they have no expectation of not receiving reward, thus rendering themselves as a receptacle for reward. It is true that it is a stance that must be ardently maintained, and one who is used to the proxy method of the monetary system will have to de-program themselves if they have been charging for spiritual services. This is not judging others, but simply sharing what I intuitively perceive as fact. Which is, the highest potential that one can attain of which contributes to the whole/highest intent, is compromised to an extent when ones motives are centred on the survival sacral chakra. The healing as in reki will simply not be as effective. One must come from the heart unconditionally; this is not to say that one who comes from the heart and knows this cannot be to some extent centred on this high intent whilst also having a non-conditional bracket of expectational rewar, if they know they can remain open to heal one whilst being certain that it is worth what ever the client can offer in monetary or supportive means i.e. repayment by sharing something of value (even at a later time), ex. Taking their healer out for lunch/dinner. It costs nothing to love another that is broken and in need of healing, so that they may in time learn to do the same for others.

Where my own position is concerned, is that the epiphanies I offer for enhancement of awareness, may help others shed old perceptions which have kept them in mind frames that squander contentedness. However the intent behind the purpose of sharing these understanding is compromised when one demands reward first.

When an individual is hampered by more unuseful impressions than their throat can filter out, the heart will contract in such circumstances and they will be unable to receive or give love. In this case they are in the righteous position to get angry, however most new age teachings teach that anger is wrong in all circumstances, this is in fact incorrect. An individual who lives by such beliefs/imposed morals will bottle the anger that is begging to be released either verbally or demonstratively (not advocated as violence toward another living thing, but actively nonetheless slamming doors/inanimate objects etc.) If one chooses to suppress this impulse the anger sinks to the contracted heart chakra and depression sets in. Depending on how contracted the heart is this will determine whether an individual will have moments where they are able to express/receive love or not. Enough love and inspiration may still evoke love from them whilst they are suppressing anger with particular associations, but it will inhibit a general love of all things; life itself. If the suppressing continues to contract further chakras all the way to the base they will have dysfunctional sexuality issues and eventually involuntary outbursts of rage.

Anger is proactive, radiant, so it repels the inundating debris in a powerful directive manner. But the individual will loose energy if they stay angry (hateful) as it draws on resources of the prana that bypasses the neutral point of the contracted throat and the heart chakras, which is then centred on reception circulated by the sacral/solar plexus region. So if an individual stays angry their life force is not received by the solar plexus as anger is radiant and continual expression of it radiates all incoming resources, such an individual will then become angry and depressed, and will seek pity from others, i.e. lower vibratory love donations “sympathy” which is the shifting of depressing feelings onto the sympathiser in exchange for the flow of their own vibrant life force energy toward the hater who has construed the sympathisers perception of the haters worthiness of receiving their loving support. This is a parasitic intent (harsh that may sound but it is true)
Those who have succumbed to parasitism must learn to discern between constant anger and healthy dislike.

Disliking another who triggers associative memories of past arguments and disputes is not the same as hate, it just means one is unable to have personalised (conditional) love from them as due to consequence of the associated thought pasterns that inhibit the hearts full flow in their presence. This means being angry at the person who has inflicted such associations only when they actively stir or project anger in a undiscerning manner out of misunderstanding that they are in the wrong, Being responsible for having overloaded the inflected one in the first place. This means the individual who is disliking the other person is not hating them just returning equal and opposite intent in righteous position, thus they do not loose energy from being angry all the time. This means they can love life as a whole which is also loving their inflicter unconditionally by proxy of having moments of loving everything, thereby offering moments for the inflicter to reflect and see that they were in the wrong and thereby amend their intentions toward the person in the right.

When ones own heart frequency is totally active, they can cancel out any inflictions by a single individual (and more than one as the heart increases in power), and in the mean time once one learns how to allow collective inflictions of a higher magnitude than their Auras capacity to absorb and transmute with their heart, to just go through them and out the south end of the pranic tube immediately back to their originations. this is when one has entered the stage of becoming a master of their own Divine self maintenance.