I did a search for this but did not find this posted, apologies if it's old news but this seems to be a new updated version.
I was inspired to post this after looking through the wealth of information presented. It's worth a watch as it's well made and puts faces to
"TPTB" involved with the possible 9/11 planners as well as presents enough suspicious coincidences that warrants further investigations.
If ANY of us are even suspected of a crime, we are detained/arrested and our fate is determined on whether there is enough evidence to go to trial or
not. The personal ties to those who benefited from that disaster and who seemed to have made all the right "guesses", I'd say equal treatment is
long overdue and arrests need to be made.
There won't be any arrests of these people, but I can dream can't I?
For blueprints of the WTCs with a list of all the suspicious tenants and connections check out: 911blogger.com...
Links and sources for things mentioned in the video:
Kevin R. Ryan, et al, Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials, The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1 /
March, 2009, www.springerlink.com...
Niels H. Harrit, et al, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journal,
Vol 2, 2009, doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007, www.bentham-open.org.../2009/00000002/00000001/7T...
Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449 - Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete, www.patentstorm.us...
Steven E. Jones et al, Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, Journal of 9/11 Studies, January 2008
Albert Gibson et al, Integral low-energy thermite igniter, US Patent number: 4464989,
Skull and Bones is a secret society at Yale University, founded in 1832. Members have included George H.W. Bush, his father Prescott Bush, his son
George W. Bush, his brother Jonathan J. Bush, and many other powerful people. For LMI's mission, see its website -
Michael C. Ruppert, Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA's Highest Ranks, October 9, 2001,
Kevin R. Ryan, Mahmud Ahmed's itinerary from his Washington DC visit the week of 9/11, 911blogger.com, 11/27/2009,
The agreement between LLNL and Savannah River can be found here - www.llnl.gov...
Savannah's reference to developing sol-gels can be found here - srnl.doe.gov...
The History Commons, "Wolfowitz Doctrine", www.historycommons.org... Aaron Dykes, Wolfowitz Warns
of 'Surprise like Pearl Harbor' Months Before 9/11 Attacks, Jones Report, February 9, 2007 www.jonesreport.com...
Wolfowitz's meeting with Mahmud Ahmed was documented in a FOIA response obtained by the 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington -
Plaintiffs'' Opposition to Defendant Terrence R. McAuliffe's Motion to Dismiss, Case No: 1:98CV02859 (RCL), W.L. Meng et al vs. Bernard L. Schwartz
and Loral Space et al, US District Court for the District of Columbia, www.judicialwatch.org...
You have done a lot of work on this, well done. This is the kind of research that needs to be done.
I just hope its not killed off with noisic over the top of whats being said. Recently I downloaded a 300mb documentry about 911called "Core of
Corruption." and I only watched the first 15 minutes of it and then deleted it. The dialogue was drowned out with noise.
lets hope this video has'nt also been killed with it.
YAY.... a response, and it only took 8 hours and 22 minutes! That must mean that everyone who clicked on this link has been spending the day reading
and going through all the.....lmao.... I'm sorry I couldn't even continue, no one cares, the 30 second attention spans of the average person was put
into a deer in headlights at the mountain presented here..... and I'm just referring to the 15 minute video.
Thanks for acknowledging the work, wish I could take the credit for it all. A lot of people have been compiling evidence for the past 10 years, and
others have thrown that together into compilations. Some are videos, some are extensive reading links, but no one is going through any of it that
should be... the OS'ers.
Skeptics question, research, and compile, official story believers just believe what they want I guess.
Thanks, Jibby. It's people such as you that will ultimately force a new investigation. Each day, more and more evidence of a cover-up comes to
light, and sooner or later someone with 'clout' is going to go on the air and ask the american people, "Do you believe what they've told us?".
That's all it would take, if the right person asked. It's not too late, and thank you again for all that you do.
Skipped through most to get to the Pentagon discussion - all of a minute BTW...
Again, the inference that the portion of the Pentagon hit housed budget analysts working on the missing $2.3 T. Same fallacy told over and over again.
The people killed in that office worked for the ARMY and ARMY ONLY - they were NOT DoD budget analysts - just Army budget analysts. The Army was not
wholly responsible for the monies that Rumsfeld had difficulty tracking. The work these analysts were doing was reconstructed and no loss of
information occurred as a result of the attack.
One other thing that caught my attention as I was skimming through the video was a statement that Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the
9/11 commission. If you check the Wiki review - it doesn't say anything like that. The statment was made around the 6:15 mark. Could someone explain
how this video and Wiki could be so far apart?
I wonder what other "inconsistencies" might be found if someone really went through this video and fact checked it?
edit on 18-10-2011 by
userid1 because: (no reason given)
Wiki is by no means a solid reliable source for much of anything. Incorrect statements in the information presented vs Wiki isn't proof positive of
anything, someone coming out and sayingn X, Y, and Z missing monies have been found isn't really the end of an investigation.
I'm not able to watch the video now, but it sounds like the part about Sandy Berger might be a matter of semantics? In a lot of the news reports,
it's framed as if he's stealing from the 9/11 Commission directly, although that wasn't accurate. Here's
Fox News, describing it pretty accurately from what I understand:
WASHINGTON — Former President Clinton's national security adviser is under criminal investigation for taking highly classified terrorism
documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission probing the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, FOX News has confirmed.
I'm looking forward to watching the video and checking out the links, JibbyJedi - thanks for your work in putting this together -
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.