posted on Oct, 19 2011 @ 03:03 PM
reply to post by dplum517
....studies done by universities (funded by NASA which should also indicate they want to control contrails or possibly make their own) they
clearly indicate that persistent contrails were rare.
? Studies by Universities indicated that persistent contrails were "rare"? Quite an assertion to make, without citing any sources to back it up.
But then, the logic escapes me --- the attempted inference that NASA "funded" the University studies that are alleged to have concluded that
persistent contrails are "rare", but in the same sentence the claim is made that NASA wants to "control" or "make their own"? Ummm...if NASA (or
anyone) wants to make a contrail, it's not difficult to do. You just wait until the meteorological conditions are ripe for it.
...eitherway... everyone always ignores the last request I made in that post. Kinda funny.
...as I have said before..... IMO our gov has the ability to make "contrails" (chemtrails) long, short, persistent, no matter what weather
condition it is.
Is that a "request", or a bald assertion of opinion that is unsupported by any facts whatsoever?
And, when you say "our gov" (I presume you mean "government", not some state's governor) then the implication is that it's the United States
Government, is that your opinionated assertion?
Odd, since this thread was inspired by a person from the Netherlands (Holland) who was questioning his/her local skies (not realizing, hopefully that
has been corrected) what contrails actually are.
Is it fair to say you are now claiming that the U.S. Government is *spraying* in other countries?? There have been more claims of so-called
"chem"trails on the ATS boards lately coming from people living elsewhere than the United States.....
...and to that opinion. Just how does the U.S. Government get involved in this notion of ".....the ability to make "contrails" ...." in "no matter"
the weather conditions, when it is shown that the contrails are formed by regularly scheduled commercial airliners??
This makes no sense at all.
edit on Wed 19 October 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)