It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by topherman420
Originally posted by ludshed
I thought 24 ended? Another season?
No it's the movie Unthinkable with Samuel L Jackson. Not a bad movie either.
Im curious as to what this experiment by the OP is going to accomplish. Whats the goal OP? Sounds like an intriguing start of a thread.edit on 13-10-2011 by topherman420 because: grammar gremlin made me do it
That movie actually seemed like propaganda to me. I don't mean that in an ignorant way. Just that after I watched it, it had no worth as a piece of art. The goal seemed to deliver a message only.
As a neutral supporter of both parties I presume, do you think the killing last week by Obama was justified?
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by LogiosHermes27
Would you make a decision to torture him…not only him, but if it comes down to it to save 40million Americans, his children, his wife and his mother?
12PM SEPTEMBER 11,2012
You have 2 hours to make a decision, what will your decision be?
Torture is notoriously unreliable to begin with. And evil will always beget evil. So there would be no torture going on if I could make the decision.
Torture is simply not an acceptable option in any case.
Its really not a difficult decision to make. Basically it comes down the individuals principles that they live by, and specifically those whose principles are to not torture, and challenging them, tempting them, to give in and betray those principles for a reward; in this case, a small chance that some pertinent information would be released to supposedly save 40M lives.
Basically, its the "would you sell your soul if the price was high enough?" question.
My answer to that question, and to the quandary of would I betray my principles if the pay out was high enough, is always going to be NO. My principles are not up for sale or trade.edit on 10/13/2011 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by StarfireZeta
Just use the most effective truth drug to get confessional information from the captured enemy.
Originally posted by grumpydaysleeper
reply to post by LogiosHermes27
The constitution is important, and this is definitely not an easy question to answer,
but what about all the children who will die?
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to post by LogiosHermes27
Nah, you're baiting. We've seen it before. You're trying to justify why Barrack Obama decided to assassinate a U.S. citizen on foreign soil while having no weapons (especially uranium) in his possession at the time of the assassination. The guy should have had a trial under the rule of law, and that's that.
Your story is in NO way comparable anyway.edit on 13-10-2011 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LogiosHermes27
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by LogiosHermes27
Would you make a decision to torture him…not only him, but if it comes down to it to save 40million Americans, his children, his wife and his mother?
12PM SEPTEMBER 11,2012
You have 2 hours to make a decision, what will your decision be?
Torture is notoriously unreliable to begin with. And evil will always beget evil. So there would be no torture going on if I could make the decision.
Torture is simply not an acceptable option in any case.
Its really not a difficult decision to make. Basically it comes down the individuals principles that they live by, and specifically those whose principles are to not torture, and challenging them, tempting them, to give in and betray those principles for a reward; in this case, a small chance that some pertinent information would be released to supposedly save 40M lives.
Basically, its the "would you sell your soul if the price was high enough?" question.
My answer to that question, and to the quandary of would I betray my principles if the pay out was high enough, is always going to be NO. My principles are not up for sale or trade.edit on 10/13/2011 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)
So because of principles you would let 40 million people die ?
Originally posted by Wookiep
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by Wookiep
Unless I read the OP wrong, I'm assuming the event hasn't happened yet. No-one dies, you lose
No, we know about it 2 hrs before SHTF. Do we:
A. Abide by the constitution(doing so would ensure everyones death since the perp is unwilling to tell and we cant force the info out of him)
B. Torture this sick puppy until he sings like a birdy(saving millions of lives)
Of course we'd do what we gotta do in that situation, it's pretty much a no brainier in that case, BUT..the OP is just using this to try and find a way to justify Barrack Obamas recent assassination, and the story in the OP isn't even close to it. That's it.
Ultimately, people might die. Big deal to be honest. We all die and some things our outside of our control. I see no reason to have blood on even more hands than there was to begin with if it isn't going to mean much. The truth will come out in the end and those who were involved, if they acted in a moral and just way will be rewarded for such.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Originally posted by LogiosHermes27
Would you make a decision to torture him…not only him, but if it comes down to it to save 40million Americans, his children, his wife and his mother?
12PM SEPTEMBER 11,2012
You have 2 hours to make a decision, what will your decision be?
Torture is notoriously unreliable to begin with. And evil will always beget evil. So there would be no torture going on if I could make the decision.
Torture is simply not an acceptable option in any case.
Its really not a difficult decision to make. Basically it comes down the individuals principles that they live by, and specifically those whose principles are to not torture, and challenging them, tempting them, to give in and betray those principles for a reward; in this case, a small chance that some pertinent information would be released to supposedly save 40M lives.
Basically, its the "would you sell your soul if the price was high enough?" question.
My answer to that question, and to the quandary of would I betray my principles if the pay out was high enough, is always going to be NO. My principles are not up for sale or trade.edit on 10/13/2011 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)
Tough question( I don't personally believe we should haveever crossed that threshold as a nation.): I applaud your sense of "principle.
The other 39,999,9999 of "us"are already calling for YOU to receive the first bullet.to get out of the way. Is one man's sense of principle worth 40million others lives? hmmmmm Thought provoking. Sometimes adults have to do tough things.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
The world does not run on sunshine, rainbows and idealism. Principles of law have little sway when 40m lives are at stake. There comes a time when you have to choose between your idealistic notions and the cynicism that is reality.
When 40m lives are at stake and you choose to let them die for your "Principles"-then really, you shouldn't be in the position to make that choice in the first place.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
The OP has given a scenario and asked if I was in the oval office and had to make a choice, what would it be, and after come careful consideration, the following can be stated:
Based off of the information, I would demand that the rule of Law be followed. He would not be tortured, nor would I insist that we torture his family, rather that they be treated like any other person of interest in the US, to include that a full investigation be made, and that his rights be honored and upheld, no matter what, to include ensuring that he knew his Miranda rights, and then have him watched like a hawk.
When you respond to a potential terrorist threat or even react to one, you lose, as the terrorist want that kind of reaction. Espousing the very ideas of liberty and justice should be followed and examples made. While if they were able to find this person, and the evidence to produce for his guilt, then the officials should be clever enough to determine if there are 2 bombs and what cities they are in. To announce such would be forbidden and held on the quiet, as to prevent mass riots and panic in the streets of every major US city across the country and those who were of this mans faith would also suffer, even though they would be innocent.
However, as this is a credible threat, as the OP asked, then the next steps would be crucial. First would be to mobilize all military personnel in the US, deputizing them as federal marshal’s thus bypassing the laws that prohibit the use of military on US soil. I would then have FEMA get its forces ready, and proceed to set up a call center, calling the governors of all 50 states to be prepared to take in refugee’s from this event.
Having that ready, and in place, then it is a waiting game, as they would have to move fast, as it could be easy to figure out and backtrack, where this guy was, where he traveled to and from, thus narrowing down the list of states and cities. From there, it would be a matter of being prepared for the worst and ensuring that the trial went forward as planned, ultimately to determine his guilt or innocence in a court of law.
Should a bomb go off, and he states yes he did it, then he would have to go through the courts, and the evidence presented, along with all statements he made.
If we give up the rule of law, failing to protect the rights of one citizen, even those deemed murderous and ultimately unfit for society, then we would be no better than the terrorist that seek to destroy those rights for everyone.
The ends cannot be used to justify the means.
That kind of thinking allows any and all atrocities to be common place in the world.
Its partially why the world is in such ethical shambles as it is now.
Or are you coming from the materialist stand point on this?
Text not only men and women, but also children. when you choose to kill in this fashion, you have given up your right to be considered a human, and there is no shame in disposing of them in any and all ways.