Originally posted by randyvs
OP, can I ask you just how you reached this conclusion ? What's the data look like supporting this doomy gloomy
prediction ? Why can't it be Elenin ? I liked it a lot better, when Elenin was coming to do the dirty work. This asteroid thingy is just not that
much fun. You know, so many Hollywood references to Ele.
Bring back Elenin!
This crazy conclusion was reached by originally looking at 9/11 and comparing it to all other terrorist attacks.
It was head and shoulders bigger than all previous terrorist attacks around the world. For years, we have been hearing '9/11' this, '9/11' that.
Like we were never being allowed to forget, like we were being indoctrinated to remember. Which to me, suggests there was something incredibly
important to know.
All four planes hijacked, with no US response to them (although possibly a response on 93).
I wondered why terrorist would attack the targets they did.
I wondered why terrorist wouldn't target Capitol Hill.
I wondered why terrorist wouldn't target the White House.
After all, they had the element of surprise, they had four planes. So why choose those targets.
Targeting either the White house or Capitol Hill would have sent a bigger message 'that you mean business', it would also have crippled US
government for a while.
Four planes hijacked, no response, three big buildings completely destroyed to dust.
Basically, to me, the events of that day were too big. Far too big.
That, is where it all began.
P.S. I would like Elenin back too, it was entertaining for a while wondering what the next youtube video was going to be claiming!