Here is a link to another article on the making of these crystal skulls.

The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Read the article to learn how even museums were taken by these fakes.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Topato

---

Here is a link to another article on the making of these crystal skulls.

The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Read the article to learn how even museums were taken by these fakes.

Please read this article and learn why the skulls are fake.
1. In some cases the crystal material origin has been identified. It is not from Central America.
2. There is no record that any of the skulls originated from dig sites.
3. Microscopy reveals modern tools have been used.

Originally posted by mugger
reply to post by stereologist

---

I watched a show on some of these skulls a while back. I though 2 or 3 of them could not be proven to be made with modern tools and flawless? I think one had the separate jawbone if I recall, and man-made tools could not duplicate it intricacy without destroying it.

Analysis of the Mitchell-Hedges crystal skull using SEM leaves little doubt that this object was carved and polished using modern, high-speed, diamond-coated, rotary, cutting and polishing tools of minute dimensions. This technology is certainly not pre-Columbian. I believe it is decidedly 20th century.

I have also read that. Most of the crystal skulls can be proven as modern or from the 1800's on but the original 13 cannot be duplicated and microscopic investigation has shown (many times) that there were no tool marks. On top of all that the recent found codices supposedly included depictions with the skulls being used in rituals.

I am not an expert on hieroglyphs but this codex does not look like any of the four known codices. The whole design is a mess. Other codices do not include lines from glyphs to images. The images themselves are most revealing. Most of them look like hands and arms, not the typical motif found in a codex.