It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

George Soros money behind Occupy Wall Street?

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:46 PM
link   
www.firstpost.com...




Soros and the protesters deny any connection. But Reuters did find indirect financial links between Soros and Adbusters, an anti-capitalist group in Canada which started the protests with an inventive marketing campaign aimed at sparking an Arab Spring type uprising against Wall Street. Moreover, Soros and the protesters share some ideological ground.


If true, then this is another one of the New World Order agenda's. Fund both sides. By doing so, the elite are creating the uprising they need to break apart this country and make America one step closer to playing a part in the development of a one world government. This doesn't take away from the legitimate gripe of the 99% crowd. But it does show that the elite really are quite sinister and deceptive and will do anything for control and ultimately rule over us.




posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by FaceLikeTheSun
 


What would he fund? Sunscreen supplies?

Until they become organized etc. And funding --organization/transportation/materials/agenda items/central planning, like Koch-Freedomworks- Tea Party...becomes neccessary, it is early to connect the dots.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by FaceLikeTheSun
 


How can George Soros fund this, when the it is being actioned by a bunch of dirty
commie hippies who are trying to take more on my money so they can sit in a basement
playing the Super Mario Bros and watch Def Leopard videos.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by FaceLikeTheSun
 


Very similiar to the Franco-Prussian War where the Rothchilds funded both sides and then brought down the British economy. The United Kingdom's beginning of the end of Empire.

Sounds plausible to me.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by FaceLikeTheSun
www.firstpost.com...




Soros and the protesters deny any connection. But Reuters did find indirect financial links between Soros and Adbusters, an anti-capitalist group in Canada which started the protests with an inventive marketing campaign aimed at sparking an Arab Spring type uprising against Wall Street. Moreover, Soros and the protesters share some ideological ground.


If true, then this is another one of the New World Order agenda's. Fund both sides. By doing so, the elite are creating the uprising they need to break apart this country and make America one step closer to playing a part in the development of a one world government. This doesn't take away from the legitimate gripe of the 99% crowd. But it does show that the elite really are quite sinister and deceptive and will do anything for control and ultimately rule over us.


OWS is NOT a organised revolt, it's a spontaneous revolt of people wanting to stop the foolish system called neo-capitalism/corporatism ..... this is why you see it start also in other countrys like Australia ... and even Europe.
So what, if Soros wants to show solidarity, well why not ?
he was not funding OWS before it started on the streets, he is not funding it now to keep control over it !!! it's not like the KOCH brothers creating out of the blue, with BIG BIG funding, some tea-potty-party puppet pressure group to kill Obama ...... politically of course ( or more - remember Kennedy ok ? ) .
Soros or no Soros, we know what is happening and are not stupid to let some manipulators destroy our actions and ideas and hope !!! the most dangerous ones are the police infiltrators that try to change peacefull manifestation into urban violence !!! keep an eye on this, keep your cameras ready to film those bas***rds infiltrated and trying to discredit your / the people's voice !!!!!!!!!! keep going ! keep pressure ! Chapeau !!



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by mastahunta
reply to post by FaceLikeTheSun
 


How can George Soros fund this, when the it is being actioned by a bunch of dirty
commie hippies who are trying to take more on my money so they can sit in a basement
playing the Super Mario Bros and watch Def Leopard videos.



very stupid talk man ! ok ? you are talking stupid ok ? did you see all those people ??? all hippies ??
and what do you have against hippies ??? what kind of person are you ?? a popstar ? a teapottyparty-puppet ?
a priest ? a medium ? a capitalist $$$$ greedy ego-man ? a middle class supertaxed man ? I don't know what you are, why do you judge other people without even knowing them ?? OK ??? have a nice sleep and tell me what YOU, big ego, are doing against the killing of our HUMAN society ..... do you revolt or do accept the situation like it is in US and everywhere else : more poverty, more stupidity, more problems, more greedy bast**rds ...... etc etc .... tired of all those brain sleeping neurons !!!
edit on 13-10-2011 by Sunlionspirit because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Sunlionspirit
 


I see you have been bitten by the ideological bug.

The Tea Party is not funded by the Koch Bros. A element of the Tea Party as accepted funding by them, but not all, and if you really look at the Tea Party, you will see that it is a fractured as OWS concerning groups with different agendas.

Now let's reverse roles shall we?

The OWS is not funded by Soros. A element of the OWS as accepted funding by him and his front companies, but not all, and if you really look at the OWS, you will see that it is a fractured as the Tea Party concerning groups with different agendas.

It's pretty much have the same thing, ain't it?



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:18 PM
link   
You cannot politicize this event. Informed citizens, leaderless and driven for all the right reasons will not look to leadership if the feet on the ground are the leadership. This is not like any sets of protest i have seen in anytime before 2001. It is GLOBAL. It is a time of momentous change and there will be bumps. We need to rely upon each others' dream of a better future rather than the dreams of other more grand ideals. Basics first.... then politics and ect.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:34 PM
link   
In the article it talks about the fact that he funded adbusters before the movement started, adbusters being a shill company that goes around to websites and posts whatever it is that people pay them to, busting the usual type of advertisement. Its most probable that the company initially started trying to recruit people for this movement, by whatever means they did, backed by DARTH SOROS (maniacal laughter), you cant just have something spontaneous, people have to communicate until other people can copy cat the idea.... stand alone complex at its best.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by soylentcitizen
You cannot politicize this event. Informed citizens, leaderless and driven for all the right reasons will not look to leadership if the feet on the ground are the leadership. This is not like any sets of protest i have seen in anytime before 2001. It is GLOBAL. It is a time of momentous change and there will be bumps. We need to rely upon each others' dream of a better future rather than the dreams of other more grand ideals. Basics first.... then politics and ect.


We all dream of a better future. That's not the issue here. The problem is not the ideals of these people. The protesters, at least the ones who are informed, are there because they want to create change. But the issue is that the agenda behind the making of a world government cannot happen expressively by force. They need to create the chaos to provide a solution. This is shown throughout history over and over again. And so even though the people are there as an uprising, the elite will, and probably already has plans in place to use this momentum to usher in their globalist agenda. It's NOT as simple as "we will rise and down with the government."
edit on 13-10-2011 by FaceLikeTheSun because: typo



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 03:57 PM
link   
Let's see here.
Adbusters is generally given credit for having the idea of OWS.
Adbusters is partially funded by The Tides Foundation.
Soros partially funds The Tides Foundation.
The New York park where OWS is taking place is owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Mayor Bloomberg's girlfriend, Diana Taylor, is on the board of Brookfield Asset Management.
Brookfield Asset Management owns Brookfield Renewable Power which owns BAIF Granite Holdings who just got a $135.8 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy.
Brookfield has been represented by the lobby firm Heather Podesta and Partners, LLC. Podesta, a top financial bundler for Democrat politicians, is wife of lobbyist and art collector, Tony Podesta, who is the brother of John Podesta.
John Podesta was President Obama’s White House transition director.
John Podesta is head of The Center for American Progress.
Guess who provides some of the funding for The Center for American Progress?
The Tides Foundation.
The Democratic Party is trying to merge it's Rebuildthedream.org's agenda with OWS.

Time magazine. "Inside the Organized Left's Courtship of Occupy Wall Street"

There's a saying. "Once is happenstance. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is enemy action."

Go! Lemmings Go!



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by JIMC5499
Let's see here.
Adbusters is generally given credit for having the idea of OWS.
Adbusters is partially funded by The Tides Foundation.
Soros partially funds The Tides Foundation.
The New York park where OWS is taking place is owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Mayor Bloomberg's girlfriend, Diana Taylor, is on the board of Brookfield Asset Management.
Brookfield Asset Management owns Brookfield Renewable Power which owns BAIF Granite Holdings who just got a $135.8 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy.
Brookfield has been represented by the lobby firm Heather Podesta and Partners, LLC. Podesta, a top financial bundler for Democrat politicians, is wife of lobbyist and art collector, Tony Podesta, who is the brother of John Podesta.
John Podesta was President Obama’s White House transition director.
John Podesta is head of The Center for American Progress.
Guess who provides some of the funding for The Center for American Progress?
The Tides Foundation.
The Democratic Party is trying to merge it's Rebuildthedream.org's agenda with OWS.

Time magazine. "Inside the Organized Left's Courtship of Occupy Wall Street"

There's a saying. "Once is happenstance. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is enemy action."

Go! Lemmings Go!


Dot to dot to dot. Very well linked.


But where does Kevin Bacon fit into all of this?



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 09:21 PM
link   
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


Thanks. I just spit beer all over my cell phone.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   
You are correct sir. Soros explained years ago how to destroy a society.

Hear it straight from the horses mouth in this video:


Soros explains how the dollar needs to be destroyed. How an uprising needs to be funded to get the ball rolling. How he likes to play God with countries by manipulating people, governments, and their financial system.

He's an evil manipulative man that starts and funds international and national crisis, especially when there's already faultering trust between the people and their government. Genius but EVIL.
edit on 10/13/11 by AstroBuzz because: (no reason given)

edit on 10/13/11 by AstroBuzz because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 10:00 PM
link   
THE OFFICIAL STANCE OF THE #OOCUPYEVERYTHING - OCCUPY TOGETHER - #OCCUPYWALLSTREET MOVEMENTS AND ALL ASSOCIATED MARCHES & OCCUPATIONS THROUGHOUT THE PLANET CURRENTLY :

This group wants absolutely nothing to do with the corrupt 2 party oligarchy as both have been bought and paid by the banks, The Federal Reserve and Wall Street and does not need nor require money from 1%'rs and to say anything otherwise is a major dis service to this group and movement as a whole as we see people like Soros as being apart of the problem and does not endorse millionaires or billionaires. No corporate dollars are welcomed and if one were to attempt to finance this movement it would be rejected and returned with a note saying "No sale!"!

To believe anything else means you are being seriously deceived and tricked and should not be trusted or taken seriously and if it does not come from the aforementioned it is not to be taken as the official stance. No General Assembly in any group throughout the planet will amend this ever!
edit on 13-10-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
grass roots people dont use the term oligarchy

more proof especially considering the average person doesnt even know what the hell that means.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 02:47 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


An oligarchy works like a Monarchy but the difference between the two is that a Monarchy is "One Family Rule" and an Oligarchy is where a group of people or individuals working in concert with one another to only allow their people to be elected and only their ranks would hold positions of prominence.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 09:51 AM
link   
You do know that actual researchers and journalists have already debunked the Soros connection?

Soros: not a funder of Wall Street protests



(Reuters) - George Soros isn't a financial backer of the Wall Street protests, despite speculation by critics including radio host Rush Limbaugh that the billionaire investor has helped fuel the anti-capitalist movement.

www.reuters.com...


The faulty connect the dots...

Between 2007-2009 George Soros gave 3.5 Million to the "Tides Foundation"

Between 2007-2009 the "Tides Foundation" gave 26k to AdBusters.

AdBusters wrote opinions and articles that spurred and encouraged the OWS movement.

Where the connection breaks down.

The Tides Foundation also donates money to the Ford Foundation, The Gates Iniative and other Non-Profits.

The Money George Soros gave to the Tides foundation was EARMARKED...meaning it could only be spent on specific causes and both the Tides Foundation and Soros disclosed that the money was restricted and none of it was directed to or spent on AdBusters. Adbusters acknowledged this as well, saying they would love George Soros to give them money, but they haven't gotten any. The IRS reports confirm this truth. The dates of contributions to the Tides Foundation confirm it was before the OWS Movement. All of this apart from the fact that AdBusters is not in control of the movement.

The connection is not there. The facts debunk Limbaugh's claim....and if the false claim wasn't outright debunked by records, then best case scenario it would be built upon the idea that Soros gave Tides money, who gave Adbusters money and AdBusters wrote stories...and the funding for that equalled 26K??

Really? And even that 26K after passing through multiple degrees from Soros - to His Foundation - to Tides Foundation - to adBusters(where the link was broken)...the question would remain...26k? A couple years before the OWS protests?

Seriously weak connect the dots and the facts oppose the claim...as does logic..





edit on 14-10-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 10:45 AM
link   
reply to post by Indigo5
 


Adbusters involvement is only recent and the fact they got money means nothing and is no indicator that the very cent spent to issue to Adbusters was the exact same cent that Soros gave to Tides.

Adbusters spent that money on server rental fees as that will pay for only like what? 6 months? A site like ATS would blow through that in 3 months on server costs alone.

This disproves and destroys this claim right out the water.

Say I give you $100 and you spend it on I don't know, say a dozen packs of pens at $8 each, that $100 I gave you bought you pens and you make another $500 on services rendered and you finance a political movement. My money does not finance the movement. You'd need at least $500,000 to be rendered half as effective.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 10:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5
You do know that actual researchers and journalists have already debunked the Soros connection?


Really? Define actual? Oh you mean ones that you agree with.


Originally posted by Indigo5

Between 2007-2009 George Soros gave 3.5 Million to the "Tides Foundation"

Between 2007-2009 the "Tides Foundation" gave 26k to AdBusters.

AdBusters wrote opinions and articles that spurred and encouraged the OWS movement.

Where the connection breaks down.

The Tides Foundation also donates money to the Ford Foundation, The Gates Iniative and other Non-Profits.


The Ford Foundation is on the list of Adbusters contributers as is the Glaser Foundation.


Originally posted by Indigo5
The Money George Soros gave to the Tides foundation was EARMARKED...meaning it could only be spent on specific causes and both the Tides Foundation and Soros disclosed that the money was restricted and none of it was directed to or spent on AdBusters. Adbusters acknowledged this as well, saying they would love George Soros to give them money, but they haven't gotten any. The IRS reports confirm this truth. The dates of contributions to the Tides Foundation confirm it was before the OWS Movement. All of this apart from the fact that AdBusters is not in control of the movement.

The connection is not there. The facts debunk Limbaugh's claim....and if the false claim wasn't outright debunked by records, then best case scenario it would be built upon the idea that Soros gave Tides money, who gave Adbusters money and AdBusters wrote stories...and the funding for that equalled 26K??

Really? And even that 26K after passing through multiple degrees from Soros - to His Foundation - to Tides Foundation - to adBusters(where the link was broken)...the question would remain...26k? A couple years before the OWS protests?

Seriously weak connect the dots and the facts oppose the claim...as does logic..


First, who brought Limbaugh into this? I didn't mention him in my post.

Second, ever hear of "creative bookkeeping? These "foundations" do it all of the time. Soros gives 3.5 million to the Tides Foundation, with the specification that they can't spend any of it on Adbusters. (if you believe that) Fine. They take the money that they had earmarked for something else and give it to Adbusters and then replace the earmarked money with the money they got from Soros. Technically they didn't spend any of Soros's money on Adbusters.

OWS has too many coincidences for it to have happened by chance and too many of these lead to Soros.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join