It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
.The United States and Saudi Arabia have pledged to pursue a "strong and unified" international response to the alleged plot by elements of the Iranian government to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington.
Iran has denied the allegations. The state-run IRNA news agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Ahani Wednesday as calling the scenario "absurd" and urging Saudi Arabia to be wary of U.S. efforts to damage relations of countries in the region.
Previously, Saudi Arabia had said the citizenship of 15 of the 19 hijackers was in doubt despite U.S. insistence they were Saudis. But Interior Minister Prince Nayef told The Associated Press that Saudi leaders were shocked to learn 15 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.
How come 15 out of 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, and the King of that country didn't take any action then?
Originally posted by supine
Well considering this:
www.usatoday.com...
and that we just had the 9/11 10th anniversary, something smells fishy.
How come 15 out of 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, and the King of that country didn't take any action then?
Originally posted by jrmcleod
Just curious as to which "International Law" was broken. I'm going to presume that the law that was broken was relating to killing another individual by means of bombs/assassination?
If so then can someone please tell me why the governments of the UK, US, France, Italy etc aren't held accountable for bombing millions of innocent people and destroying countries when ever they like? (sorry my bad, in the name of terrorism....they biggest terrorists of them all are the governments of the west - who have single handedly managed to bring this world into chaos and war)
Originally posted by filosophia
I say bring it on, although I doubt anything will come of this. The U.S. has been beating the war drums on Iran for so long I think the drum head has broken. I think most people see this as a failed false flag operation and so I guess the white house will have to smack heads together and come up with some other distraction from the various impeachable offenses building against Obama.
Originally posted by filosophia
I say bring it on, although I doubt anything will come of this. The U.S. has been beating the war drums on Iran for so long I think the drum head has broken. I think most people see this as a failed false flag operation and so I guess the white house will have to smack heads together and come up with some other distraction from the various impeachable offenses building against Obama.
Originally posted by kennylee
Even though I believe that Iran is building nuclear weapons and I believe that they would use them, I do not believe they were behind this terrorist plot, if there was one.
Like a lot of people, I believe this came way too conveniently at the time that Eric Holder and the Obama administration were getting a lot of heat for Fast and Furious. They had to come up with a Big Story to make the sheeple believe that if it weren't for them, a lot of Americans would have been killed, in the supposed restaurant bombing that the supposed terrorists had planned.
Their intentions, IMO, were to make the Citizens think..."Well no matter how they were involved in that Fast and Furious thing, its a good thing they were there to stop these terrorists."
My question is, "Are there really that many sheeple left inside the country to believe this crap?"edit on 10/13/11 by kennylee because: spelling