A closer look at the pentagon camera footage, page 4

Ok. The Pentagon scene was 'staged'. Now I know most of you know that's what I think but just to lay it out there for any newbies...

On another thread I started talking about witnesses and smoke trails and how none of the Pentagon witnesses mentioned seeing any smoke trail. No Pentagon witness said like: "Oh, I seen the plane cross the road, the right engine (from behind) hit a light pole and started smoking profusely..." Didn't happen. So now we have this little video, it has a smoke trail, some company did a Solidworks animated video of it, smoke trail looks big in animation and some 5m in height if we go by the blurry video. And no witness mentioned it. I find that seriously odd.

It's like I said, say some perp with a gun robs a Pizza Hut at lunchtime and 100 people are there, and in the police reports of the robbery, no one mentions the shotgun.That kind of odd.

So some people on here say not enough credit is given to eyewitness etc. It's hard for me especially because I know the Pentagon scene was staged. But I'm going to go with the witnesses for now. I think if there were actual witnesses one of them would've mentioned the prominent smoke trail over the Pentagon lawn on 9/11. Because none did then there wasn't one. (Hey, it's either that or the witnesses are phony or they failed to mention a shotgun, which seems implausible to me.)

But you will say, 'ok, but there seems to be one in the video...'

Right but how much are you people taking givens as givens? "Oh the witnesses said this, oh there's clearly a smoke trail on the video, oh look at that blotch it's surely big enough to be a 757, oh the FBI said there was nothing on those other 84 tapes," etc. etc. Whatever floats your boat.

The Pentagon scene was STAGED pre and POST crash. It was. And no amount of OSers on here chomping at the post bit and frothing at their keyboard mouths is going to change that or my awareness of it. 9/11 was ten plus years ago, why you all so hotheaded still about it? Some of you sound desperate frankly. Sounds like you all got fevers.

Ok, so now I'm questioning the smoke trail, is it real? Is the video legitimate? What evidence do we have that it is genuine or doctored? Do we have any?

I think 9/11 was extensively planned, therefore I think very little of it is either overlooked or a mistake. I think if something is released, due to the extreme planning, it is due extreme scrutiny. I'm going with the smoke trail being fake. That means I also think the blotch isn't a 757, missile or jet. Yeah that's right.

I want to talk a bit more about the video though, especially the end, where the little generator that could went puff puff puff all the way home. Look at the animated video right at the end, you will see the post impact. That little puffing engine that is the rightmost vertical puffer in the clip, is our little generator friend - puffing away. I call it Puffy McPuffPuff. (For obvious reasons.)

Oh it's all obvious to me.

Have a close look at it because TWICE Dave said I couldn't tell what was shown there at the end of the video. Look and post what you can see but be warned, if you say you can see it Dave will say you just simply cannot. Oh well.

You see, it's funny that that generator would go puff puff puff like that I think. Especially as it rests directly between the highway and the impact hole in the wall etc. Right? You follow? Not only is this thing only on the side of the Pentagon where the 'plane' hit. After the 'plane' hit all it does is puff puff puff smoke into the air.

Why in my book that's a TC - a Triple Coincidence.

1. It's on the side where the plane hit.
2. it gets damaged in the hit.
3. It starts puffing thick smoke after being hit.

and you might go QC and say

4. It just happens to be in the middle of the direct line between the impact hole and the highway. Hmm

Now how did it get there? Oh ya some company was working on the building... turns out it's also the same company that helped clean up Ground Zero... ...interesting. Well, I think it is.

Do watch the video till the very end and see it puff puff puffing away.

Now, think about this. What are the odds of it being there and being damaged in the 'strike' only enough for it to smoke profusely, considering on exactly where it happened to be? It wasn't missed or completely crushed or obliterated, no, it was struck in such a way at to only smoke like a steam engine. Hmm. Could you plan that with a 757? A missile? A military jet? With any projectile? I don't think so.

Therefore I think it had to have been set off to smoke exactly like that.

Think how incredible it is that it's there, it gets hit enough to smoke as opposed to missed or obliterated and it's directly in front of the hole from the main viewing angles... naw, no evidence of 'staging' in that. That's all natural OS!

Cheers