It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual identity

page: 25
28
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


Sorry if I came across as abrupt towards you, Annee. I like you, actually, but I've been reading this thread on and off all day and now I'm not sure if it's making me angry or just depressed.
edit on 13-10-2011 by LPWilletts because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by LPWilletts
reply to post by Annee
 


Sorry if I came across as abrupt towaeds you, Annee. I like you, actually, but I've been reading this thread on and off all day and now I'm not sure if it's making me angry or just depressed.


No problem.

I've been at it for 20 years. I'm almost immune. I've heard it all - - multiplied.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by Annee
Oh God - - another "I have nothing against homosexuals - - but . . . "

They are equal - - they are the same. There is nothing wrong with their reproductive system. Homosexuals can and have had offspring the traditional way.


This isn't a gay rights issue. Its about what is best for the children.

Is homosexual adoption a positive thing for adopted children?



How many children do you have?

Real statistics of studies done in the US show there is no difference in a child with gay or straight parents.

If anything - - children of gay parents have an edge - - because of understanding tolerance.

The children are fine - - - if there are issues - - - they come from homophobic/bigoted adults outside the family.


edit on 13-10-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino
Furthermore, the report shows that statistics have brought to light the fact that same-sex relationships betray a much higher instance of separation and break-up than heterosexual relationships, increasing the likelihood that the child will experience familial instability.

www.lifesitenews.com...
.

About LIFE SITE NEWS

LifeSiteNews.com emphasizes the social worth of traditional Judeo-Christian principles but is also respectful of all authentic religions and cultures that esteem life, family and universal norms of morality.

Who Produces LifeSiteNews?

The service was originally started by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC), a Canadian national pro-life organization headquartered in Toronto, Canada. Campaign Life Coalition, founded in 1978, was one of the first pro-life organizations to emphasize the international dimension of attacks on life and family. Along with a few other groups it pioneered pro-life lobbying at United Nations conferences. CLC president, Jim Hughes, is currently also vice-president of the International Right to Life Federation.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by thebtheb
 


I hope your post gets a million stars.

I've actually sat here giggling like mad at the rabid gay-haters losing their # over something that has no effect on them whatsoever. It has no real effect on anybody, it's just a thing to prevent a little confusion and had it not have been posted here, you most likely wouldn't ever have known about it (unless you're in the habit of looking up gay-related news). You guys need to calm down about these things, you just sound hysterical.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 07:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Amadeo
 

Yes, their hysterical obsession with what other adults do in their bedrooms is quite unhealthy, isn't it?

I can imagine these numbskulls blowing steam out of their ears and frothing at the mouth whenever one of the Big, Bad Gays comes on the TV.

Do you think they need to get a brain, or get a life? Or just crawl back under the stones they crawled out from, and rejoin all the other hollow-headed pondlife?



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 08:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Amadeo
reply to post by thebtheb
 


I hope your post gets a million stars.

I've actually sat here giggling like mad at the rabid gay-haters losing their # over something that has no effect on them whatsoever. It has no real effect on anybody, it's just a thing to prevent a little confusion and had it not have been posted here, you most likely wouldn't ever have known about it (unless you're in the habit of looking up gay-related news). You guys need to calm down about these things, you just sound hysterical.


Yeah, you're right! At this point, the whole thread is hilarious!



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Viking9019
 


Who wasnt bullied, because they had heterosexual couples?

Whom are you referring to exactly?



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 12:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Annee
The children are fine - - - if there are issues - - - they come from homophobic/bigoted adults outside the family.


Or homophobic children?



Rules for heads say that using language such as 'gay' - which has had near-universal usage among British schoolchildren in recent years to denote something as inferior - counts as homophobic bullying, even if pupils do not have any homophobic intention in mind when using the word.

Primary school pupils must be taught 'the nature and consequences of homophobic bullying', according to the rules.

www.dailymail.co.uk...


Homophobic children are put on a register in the UK.



The scale of the effort to stop children using homophobic or racist language was revealed after the parents of a ten-year-old primary school pupil in Somerset, Peter Drury, were told that his name would be put on a register and his behaviour monitored while he remained at school.

The boy was reported after he called a friend 'gay boy'.

His parents fear the record of homophobic bullying will count against him throughout his school career and even into adulthood.

www.dailymail.co.uk...


But the thought police really do appear to be out in strength.



People who have concerns about the adoption of children by gay couples are 'retarded homophobes', the state-funded national adoption agency said yesterday.

Earlier this year there was a fierce controversy when a Scottish couple said they were warned they would never see their two grandchildren again unless they dropped their opposition to them being adopted by a gay couple.

For two years, they fought for their rights to care for the little boy and girl whose 26-year-old mother, the couple's daughter, is a recovering heroin addict.

They finally agreed to an adoption but were shocked to be told the children were going to a gay household.

When the grandfather protested, he said he was told: 'You can either accept it, and there's a chance you'll see them twice a year, or you can take that stance and never see them again.'

www.dailymail.co.uk...


Do you agree that

1. Homophobic bullying primary school children should be put on an official register?
2. Primary school children should be educated about the nature and consequences of homophobic bullying?
3. People who object to homosexual adoption are 'retarded homophobes'?
4. Family who object to children being adopted by homosexuals should have all access cut off to the children?

All of the above are official UK policy.





edit on 14-10-2011 by ollncasino because: spelling



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 12:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by Annee
The children are fine - - - if there are issues - - - they come from homophobic/bigoted adults outside the family.


Or homophobic children?


Hmmm - well you didn't disappoint. Actually you did - - I was really hoping you wouldn't respond with this cliché.

Homophobic children learn from Homophobic adults.

Children who accept differences - - learn from parents who teach acceptance of differences.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino
Homophobic children are put on a register in the UK


Good..



People who have concerns about the adoption of children by gay couples are 'retarded homophobes', the state-funded national adoption agency said yesterday.


Yes - they are.


Earlier this year there was a fierce controversy when a Scottish couple said they were warned they would never see their two grandchildren again unless they dropped their opposition to them being adopted by a gay couple


I am aware of this issue/story - - - and fully agree with the right of the adoptive gay couple. Their argument was religious based BTW.





Do you agree that

1. Homophobic bullying primary school children should be put on an official register?
2. Primary school children should be educated about the nature and consequences of homophobic bullying?
3. People who object to homosexual adoption are 'retarded homophobes'?
4. Family who object to children being adopted by homosexuals should have all access cut off to the children?

All of the above are official UK policy


Yes - absolutely.

.





edit on 14-10-2011 by ollncasino because: spelling



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino
Earlier this year there was a fierce controversy when a Scottish couple said they were warned they would never see their two grandchildren again unless they dropped their opposition to them being adopted by a gay couple.


Yep - - they signed over their grandchildren for adoption - - - then threw a fit when a gay couple was chosen as the best parents to adopt.

Christian couple 'felt forced' to give up grandchildren for adoption
A Christian couple who say they felt forced into giving up their grandchildren for adoption said they would never have done so if they had known they would be placed with a homosexual couple.

The 59-year-old grandfather, who has seven children of his own, told the Daily Telegraph: "There is no way we'd have allowed the children to be adopted if we'd known they were going to a gay couple.

"I told them we still wanted to care for them, but our main concern was that they went to a good home with a loving mother and father."

Oh yeah - - - just a wonderful article this one is.

www.telegraph.co.uk...



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 05:38 AM
link   
Yesterday my wife told me, that an old friend of ours had visited her at her office. This friend is a lesbian woman, who had her experiences with boyfriends and was unsure about her orientation for a long time, until she realized, she felt better in a relationship to a woman.

We as a hetero couple always tried to keep the friendship to her, since she is one of the nicest and most positive persons we know. But during the last years contact was less and we hadn't seen her for eight month.

Meanwhile this friend married her female partner. But the astounding news was that she is pregnant and is expecting her baby in a few weeks.
She always loved the family life and probably this was one reason, why she used to visit us very often in the past, taking part in our family life and playing with our child and her friends. She gets on very well with children and is liked by them very much.

One time when we were at a party at her house and we were the only heteros with child, I could not resist to ask the lesbian and gay friends of her about the problem that they never would have their own children. Some of them liked to discuss about it, some of them did not. Our friend did not take part in that discussion. Later I felt a little stupid and thought that it was a bad idea because of too many beers to talk about that matter.

Obviously our friend had all this in mind too. Her solution now: They made an agreement with a male friend. Now this child will have three parents: a married female couple and a natural father, who agreed always to take care for the child.

I am very glad for her, that she found a way to have both, a good partnership and now a child. Her solution also maybe the best possible.

I dropped that in here, because coincidentally it fits to this discussion. Take it as it is.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by UngoodWatermelon
Great news.www.danasoft.com...



Hey my IP hide software saying i am at a foreign IP address is working thank you ungood water melon you thanks for testing by IP hide software



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 07:16 AM
link   
reply to post by ChesterJohn
 


Who is trying to get peoples ISP's? I will report this to the mods if it continues.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


Do you notice, members go out of their way to paint a different picture, to what actually is in the Article. Amusing to say the least, when the whole story is known and they are caught out. Star for you!



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 08:24 AM
link   
Hey we all know that there's something wrong with hetrosexuals for not undertsanding homosexuals.

We all know that that woman and men are equal except for when women give birth which automatically makes them better then men because men are stupid and should be ashamed for not being able to give birth.

We all know that when a gay makes eyes at a hetro male it's liberation and when the hetro male is uncomfortable about it it's homophobia.

We all know that the concept of mum and dad is a freeky thing.

We all know how important it is to dumb down the education system so the minority slower kids aren't made to feel left out rather than just teach the slower kids to cope.


We all know this is a brave new better world.




posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 08:36 AM
link   
reply to post by steveknows
 


Females to the exact same thing towards other females so what is the difference from a male doing this?

Is it so disgusting to males over Homosexuals looking at other males, but it is okay for Lesbians to look at heterosexual females?



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 09:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by AnonymousFem
reply to post by steveknows
 


Females to the exact same thing towards other females so what is the difference from a male doing this?

Is it so disgusting to males over Homosexuals looking at other males, but it is okay for Lesbians to look at heterosexual females?


You need to take a closer look at what I said.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by steveknows
 


I understand what you are saying, but do you get what I am trying to point out?

That there are many who would be the first to shout that is disgusting, if a homosexual male was to look at the heterosexual male, But they would think it is okay for the Lesbian to look or even hook up with a heterosexual female. Don't you see the hypocrisy off it all?



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join