It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Europe to destroy traditional family and sexual identity

page: 11
28
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by psyop911

Originally posted by AnonymousFem
Do not like it tough. It is happening.


yeah. let's just forget for a moment that government is actually telling people how to label/call parents and it's actually putting a #ing law into practice.

and the sheeple are clapping and cheering. nah, this is just a dream.none of this is real. seriously. lol.


So it was fine for the government to use the labels "mother" and "father", but it's not ok for them to keep those labels and add "parent 1" and "parent 2" as labels...because government labelling is evil (but only now that they added something). Makes perfect sense


Thx for another great display of bigotry.


naaah, you silly. it's mainly because Parent 1 and Parent 2 sound a lot like Slave 1 or Slave 2.
or even Prisoner 1 or Prisoner 2.

but hey! that's just me. and i could be wrong. but so could you. lol.

Slave 38262-a-163.1 over & out.




posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   
reply to post by psyop911
 


Agreed. I don't see what is wrong with simply saying Mother/Father, Mother/Mother, Father/Father, because that's exactly what they'd be. Nothing homophobic about that, or wanting to keep it like that, just a difference of opinions. As a gay man, I don't want to be known as "Parent 1" or "Parent 2", I want to be known as my child's father.

Though how it's being pointed out is as "Father (Parent 1)" and "Father (Parent 2)" which I'd be okay with. Doesn't seem that silly, it lets anyone reading the document know the child belongs to us.
edit on 12-10-2011 by Saturnian because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:31 PM
link   
10 pages !!!!

I find it amazing . Well done guys and girls 10 pages of worrying about other peoples sexual preference or what's written on paper. It is gonna cause so much chaos in your life being called parent 1 or 2 , in 2011. Amazing dudes keep it up , lets change the world ..cabecas fechadas!!!



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by scrybe
Mother (Parent 1) | Father (Parent 2)

Done.


(mic check)
[jazz hands]

disagree.
Father (Parent 1) [Slave 1]
Mother (Parent 2) [Slave 2]

we from the progressive party would like to expand the current filing system thus making it
more precise and more efficient. all in favor?

[jazz hands]



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by AnonymousFem
 


I am discriminated against every single day on this board!


Basically you are called on your discrimination.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:34 PM
link   
o my god.

They don't need to do this.

YOU CAN HAVE EXCEPTIONS.

jesus...


(coming from a what you'd call "gay man")



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by psyop911

Originally posted by scrybe
Mother (Parent 1) | Father (Parent 2)

Done.


(mic check)
[jazz hands]

disagree.
Father (Parent 1) [Slave 1]
Mother (Parent 2) [Slave 2]

we from the progressive party would like to expand the current filing system thus making it
more precise and more efficient. all in favor?

[jazz hands]


How on earth is "parent" connected to "slave"? And why is "mother" less connected to it?

Please start making sense



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Saturnian
Doesn't seem that silly, it lets anyone reading the document know the child belongs to us.


seriously? lol. i think the documents so far were pretty clear on whose child belongs to whom.
if my french is correct. but hey, that's just me. let's not criticise stupid guvmnit and their stupid
regulations, let's just sit back, enjoy ourselves, you're sleepy, eeeverything is ok, you're sleepy,
juuuuuuust relaaaax.. our guvmnit is in control now.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnonymousFem
reply to post by Six6Six
 


Do you live in the UK? If you dont then how will it effect you?

America already has it. It is about time we allowed it in the UK also. Do not like it tough. It is happening.



It may be happening but It is WRONG!! WRONG!! WRONG.

Gays have been afforded to many rule changes and disrupted the fabric of nature. Adoption and raising kids, now Parent 1 just so poor gays not offended. I do not care if they are offended. Im offended by being referred to as Parent 1.

Gays and Muslims are cut of the same cloth. Complain complain moan...stomp feet till they get their way.

Gays and Muslims outcasted themselves and have NEVER tried to fit in.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Six6Six
It may be happening but It is WRONG!! WRONG!! WRONG.

Gays have been afforded to many rule changes and disrupted the fabric of nature. Adoption and raising kids, now Parent 1 just so poor gays not offended. I do not care if they are offended. Im offended by being referred to as Parent 1.

Gays and Muslims are cut of the same cloth. Complain complain moan...stomp feet till they get their way.

Gays and Muslims outcasted themselves and have NEVER tried to fit in.



I feel like I'm back in the 50s.

Did someone sneak a time machine into this thread?



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ
How on earth is "parent" connected to "slave"? And why is "mother" less connected to it?
Please start making sense


"slave" was added for artistic value. it's all good.
also, sense died when some guvmnit uberfuhrer aparatchik
soulless lowlife clerk came to a brilliant idea for this brand
new law.

what? you're poor and the economy is going to #? wait!
catch this! now we shall call mother Parent 1 and father
Parent 2! ta-da! 22nd century! aren't we humans just swell?

khm.

meanwhile, occupator khadaffi...



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Six6Six
 





Gays have been afforded to many rule changes and disrupted the fabric of nature.


Too many rule changes slowly giving them equal rights? And how exactly does equal rights "disrupt the fabric of nature"?

As for "fabric of nature", you might wanna look up some facts:






Im offended by being referred to as Parent 1.


When you play a computer game, and the label's "player 1", does that rob you of sleep at night too?





Gays and Muslims are cut of the same cloth.


So not only a bigot, but also a racist...nice



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   
This is why there shouldn't be same sex partners. Theyre doing it that way so it doesn't seem awkward calling another dude your "mom". That right there should tell you homosexuality isn't the natural state. A man cannot get another man pregnant, thats right there is nature telling you that same sex pairs are an abhorration. P's and V's fit together perfectly like a puzzle being solved, thats what nature says.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
This is why there shouldn't be same sex partners. Theyre doing it that way so it doesn't seem awkward calling another dude your "mom". That right there should tell you homosexuality isn't the natural state. A man cannot get another man pregnant, thats right there is nature telling you that same sex pairs are an abhorration. P's and V's fit together perfectly like a puzzle being solved, thats what nature says.


Yep! You're right - - - Michelangelo was put on earth to be a breeding machine.

What was he thinking being an artist.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:08 PM
link   
mother and father refers to the two people who created the child. how can that be discriminating against gay couples? gay couples cannot have children like that, they have to adopt or invite a 3rd party into the equation.

in which case the child will still have a mother and a farther even if the gay couple raise it or the sperm was donated. everybody wether they are gay or not has a mother or farther.

it sounds like family destruction to me, simply because i cannot see how gay people could even take offence.
a child even if raised by a gay couple has a mother and farther.

they want it changed to parent 1 and parent 2 so they do not have to list the biological (real mother/farther) parent on the forms, thats all this is about, erasing mention of the 'third party' when they decide to raise children.

and what about what everybody else thinks? maybe i take offence to parent 1 and would rather be called farther, i am sick of these stupid changes that pander to groups who have nothing better to do other than complain because things are not how they want them, with no thought or care about what anybody else wants or might think.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:09 PM
link   
This is ridiculous! Somesss peoplessss are waysss toossss ssseeensssiittttiivess! This only goes to show that gay people are not yet able to accept who they are. Am I seeing some unresolved “identity issue” here? If you can’t be honest with yourself, how can you be honest with anyone else? Grow up! If you’re gay, than accept it! Don’t try to play it off as animal#1 and animal#2! Give me a break…..!
edit on 12-10-2011 by Propulsion because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Propulsion
This is ridiculous! Somesss peoplessss are waysss toossss ssseeensssiittttiivess! This only goes to show that gay people are not yet able to accept who they are. Am I seeing some unresolved “identity issue” here? If you can’t be honest with yourself, how can you be honest with anyone else? Grow up! If you’re gay, than accept it! Don’t try to play it off as animal#1 and animal#2! Give me a break…..!


One does wonder about those who protest too much.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by mamabeth
ATTENTION EVERY MEMBER ON THIS THREAD!!
I want you all to show me where I have called any of you names?
So far I have been called the following...bigot,ignorant,intolerant...
How many names have I called any of you,tell me I dare any one of you!


Well I, for one, only asked you a question on page 6, and then I posted a note on page 8 that you had not responded and may have missed it. I haven't been rude, haven't called you anything, but maybe my simple little question was too difficult for you to post an honest answer to and so you glossed over it?

With the posts you have on the same pages as mine plus those since, you could at least admit that the question was too hard, or the correct answer doesn't fit in with your belief system. But it looks like you'd rather pick a fight with other members who you think have been less polite?

edit on 12-10-2011 by waynos because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by lifeform11
they want it changed to parent 1 and parent 2 so they do not have to list the biological (real mother/farther) parent on the forms, thats all this is about, erasing mention of the 'third party' when they decide to raise children.


What?

Perhaps a gay couple does not choose to use the term "dad" for both male parents of a child or at all. But - - then again - - maybe they do. And if father "dad" is only listed once - - - oh the dilemma of the poor clerk trying to fill out the form correctly.

There are hetero parents who prefer to use their first names - - - not "mom" and "dad".

What if grandparents have custody. I don't see "grandparent" listed on the form. As a grandparent who is raising a grandchild - - I do not want to be known as "mom" - - I want to be known as grandparent.

I'd choose parent #1.

This makes it easier on everyone - - - including the clerks and processors.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Walkers
Not in my name. A marriage = one man and one woman. A relationship = one man and one woman. A family = one man and one woman + their children. I will never change my views, no matter how hard they try and force them down our throats.


Amen to that. Let's put ourselves 50 years down this slippery road. In the name of "love is the most beautiful thing", shall we consider allowing zoophiles to breed? Certainly genetics will technically allow it by then. Maybe after a few "zoo prides" and supporting movies it will eventually be viewed as natural as well. Could be interesting new issues on non-discriminating inter-species couples....



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join