Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

9/11 WAR GAMES Allowed the Attacks to Happen - Video

page: 6
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 2 2011 @ 09:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 



Considering that the exercises contained simultaneous live fly hijackings aimed at new york and the pentagon is conclusive that the war game exercises were used as an operational cover to execute the attacks.

You realize that simply repeating that statement over and over and over again won't make it true, right?
And when are you going to show everyone that these exercises installed images on the radar screens of civilian ATC's?




posted on Nov, 2 2011 @ 10:13 AM
link   





Added:

Inject #3 (Follow-on to #1) 1733Z
From: Detroit TRACON
To: NORAD /FAA/ USNORTHCOM/TSA
VIA: DEN
For the exercise this is Detroit TRACON:
We have lost track of the primary radar target. Also, Windsor Tower just called
us to report an explosion on the Detroit waterfront. They can see smoke and fire
from their position. No further information is available at this time.


Inject #7 (Follow-on #1) 1738Z
From: Detroit TRACON
To: NORAD /FAA/ USNORTHCOM/TSA
VIA: DEN
For the exercise this is Detroit TRACON:
We have received several 911 cell calls about an aircraft that just flew into the
Detroit Renaissance Center SW tower. Reports state the aircraft flew directly
into the bldg causing a large fireball and damage to the building. Detroit Fire
Dept is responding. No further info is available at this time


Threat of harm to passengers and possibly CJCS/HQ FAA directed military assistance in form of covert shadowing.


9/6/2001 Vigilante Guardian I Hijack 1/6
Threat of harm to passengers and possibly large population within US or Canada."MUM HYKRO" will rain terror from the skies onto a major US

NORAD will liaison with appropriate ARTCC
cityCJCS/HQ FAA directed military assistance in form of covert shadowing.



Yes, the war games exercises involving multiple live fly hijacked aircraft smashing into buildings planned for September 11 were used as a cover for the real attacks to happen.



posted on Nov, 2 2011 @ 10:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shadow Herder

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 


No you have not proven that there were almost daily exercises involving mulitple simultaneous hijackings that resulted in the hijackers using the planes as weapons of mass destruction. Not by a long shot.



Dont misquote me again bub! I said "I have proved that they were practicing these types of scenarios almost daily. "

You have proven yourself to have no usable knowledge pertaining to the real events of 911



As you can see exercises almost daily.... like I said.

There were wargames on 9.11 too but that has been classified. Check it yourself.
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2011 @ 10:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 



Yes, the war games exercises involving multiple live fly hijacked aircraft smashing into buildings planned for September 11 were used as a cover for the real attacks to happen.

You realize that nothing in your posts proves, live fly, or smashing planes into buildings or that exercises installed false images on the radar monitors of civilian ATC or that these exercises were conducted almost daily.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shadow Herder

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 


You speak of data related to the exercise appearing on civillian radar as well. Were they taking part in a military exercise while coordinating air traffic?


They are not making any sense. They have no knowledge. They just see TRUTHER- must go against.

There is some damning information presented in this thread. Google amalgam virgo 01. The wargames that occurred during the 911 attacks.


So you never said that the exercise data was displayed on civillian radar as well? At least I was not able to produce the post where you said that, Its something hooper said you said, it would be great if you could clarify it with a line,



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 07:45 PM
link   
Lol you guys are getting confused about your own conspiracy theories. Soo funny.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 08:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666

Originally posted by Shadow Herder

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 


You speak..........


They are not making any sense. They have no knowledge. They just see TRUTHER- must go against.

There is some damning information presented in this thread. Google amalgam virgo 01. The wargames that occurred during the 911 attacks.




Bla bla bla....

Wargames on 911. Fact. You lose, truth wins.
edit on 7-11-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 7-11-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shadow Herder
You lose, truth wins.[


Hit em low. Hit em high

We don't need facts.

We can lie lie lie.

Gooooooooo...Truthers !!!!!



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 08:33 AM
link   
Okay Wayne, everbody can say somebody is lying. Which part is the lie here? You 911 deniers swear up and down truthers are lying, but you never seem able to produce what the lie consists in, I wonder why.
edit on 8-11-2011 by autohoover1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 08:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by autohoover1
Okay Wayne, everbody can say somebody is lying. Which part is the lie here? You 911 deniers swear up and down truthers are lying, but you never seem able to produce what the lie consists in, I wonder why.
edit on 8-11-2011 by autohoover1 because: (no reason given)


It's not so much lying, as it is complete ignorance of any contradicting evidence. Every time something is proven, it is swept under the rug and forgotten, as if it was never even seen. No matter how many lessons you give on how physics works and how things in the Conspiracy Theory simply don't add up, they bring the same argument to the table year after year.

Then, you've got those folk who are new to the site, who have been indoctrinated by conspiracy websites and bad movies like Loose Change. Those people really suck because they have literally been brainwashed by clever media and bad facts. Sometimes they are violent and crazy, and have this vendetta against anyone who disagrees.

I honestly don't think anyone here is intentionally lying, but some people here definitely need a reality check.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 08:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 



Bla bla bla....
Wargames on 911. Fact. You lose, truth wins.

Wargames every day. No one cares. Irrelevant. Fact.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 11:39 AM
link   
No wargames that simulate a terrorist attack, reroute fighter aircraft away from the actual terrorist attack, do not happen every day. And it also does not happen every day that America allows their wargames to impede their surveillance or capability to react to a threat.

And it wasnt just America. During 7/7 exercises took place, where later the bombs went off. If you get caught planted any devices, no biggy, you are officially part of an exercise. After the bombs go off however, we need to stay committed to the war on terror.
edit on 8-11-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



No wargames that simulate a terrorist attack....

So how often does it happen? Don't forget you've also got to consider military exercises involving all the branches.

reroute fighter aircraft away from the actual terrorist attack, do not happen every day.

Still don't see any evidence of that. However, bear in mind that the attacks took place in Washington, DC and New York City. Not exactly prime spots for military exercises for obvious reasons. One of those obvious reasons was that both targets were within a few miles or less of some of the busiest airports in the world.

And it also does not happen every day that America allows their wargames to impede their surveillance or capability to react to a threat.

Well, that's not true. If there are exercises every day then resources are directed accordingly, every day. So on any given day, if there are terrorist attacks chances are that some military resources that will not be available.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Well you would think other squadrons are rotated in, to not leave 120 Million people undefended.

And you dont see a problem with the fact those exercises were conducted only months prior to 911, not every day (At least this exact exercise) and were not conducted after 911 and happened to coincide with 911?

And you dont see a problem with the fact, that the exercises were not terminated after the first plane hit and that exercise data kept being fed into the system, making interception very difficult or next to impossible, with the few unarmed and therefore unable to intercept fighter aircraft, that were left behind while several squadrons were rerouted torwards the Canadian boarder?

OC we dont have to speculate. There have been many credible whistleblowers.
edit on 8-11-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 07:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 



Well you would think other squadrons are rotated in, to not leave 120 Million people undefended.

I am not really sure what you mean here. Are you under the impression that there are aircraft constantly patrolling the skies over the USA?

And you dont see a problem with the fact those exercises were conducted only months prior to 911, not every day (At least this exact exercise) and were not conducted after 911 and happened to coincide with 911?

Uh, no, I don't see a problem. You know that terrorism wasn't invented on 9/11/2001, right? And I still see no evidence that any live-fly hijacking, etc. exercises were conducted on 9/11.

And you dont see a problem with the fact, that the exercises were not terminated after the first plane hit and that exercise data kept being fed into the system, making interception very difficult or next to impossible, with the few unarmed and therefore unable to intercept fighter aircraft, that were left behind while several squadrons were rerouted torwards the Canadian boarder?

Actually I don't see anything that says that is a fact. The first plane crash was still a civilian accident. Why would the military suspend its exercises because there was an accident with a civilian aircraft? What data was being fed into what system? Actually there were armed aircraft and what squadrons were routed towards Canada?



OC we dont have to speculate. There have been many credible whistleblowers.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
Well you would think other squadrons are rotated in, to not leave 120 Million people undefended.


One of my favourite Truther tropes. "How could some ay-rabs get through our glittering defences? We're safe in our super-country defended by state of the art everything, safe from the troubles of the world. And if we're not, well, somebody evil must have intentionally compromised the wonderful systems that watch over us."

You guys are going to get a massive shock as the next decade plays out.



posted on Nov, 18 2011 @ 07:36 AM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


So you are saying America does not have the capabilities to react to a threat in the timspan of about an hour and that there is nothing odd about the fact that not even half a dozen aircraft were on scramble alert armed with 2-4 sidewinders to react to a threat to the east coast.

Well if you feel thats nothing out of the ordinary we will have to agree to disagree.



posted on Nov, 18 2011 @ 07:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by hooper
 


So you are saying America does not have the capabilities to react to a threat in the timspan of about an hour and that there is nothing odd about the fact that not even half a dozen aircraft were on scramble alert armed with 2-4 sidewinders to react to a threat to the east coast.

Well if you feel thats nothing out of the ordinary we will have to agree to disagree.


That's real easy to say, respond to a threat in an hour, but in practise and in the knoweldge of what happened that day, no we do not neccessarily have the absolute capability to repsond to any kind of threat, anywhere in leass than an hour.



posted on Nov, 18 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
No wargames that simulate a terrorist attack, reroute fighter aircraft away from the actual terrorist attack, do not happen every day. And it also does not happen every day that America allows their wargames to impede their surveillance or capability to react to a threat.

And it wasnt just America. During 7/7 exercises took place, where later the bombs went off. If you get caught planted any devices, no biggy, you are officially part of an exercise. After the bombs go off however, we need to stay committed to the war on terror.
edit on 8-11-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)


Very good point and a fact. Thanks for bringing it up.



posted on Nov, 20 2011 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 


Do you have details on which squadrons exactly were involved in these exercises?





new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join