9/11 WAR GAMES Allowed the Attacks to Happen - Video, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 2-11-2011 @ 09:26 AM by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder



Considering that the exercises contained simultaneous live fly hijackings aimed at new york and the pentagon is conclusive that the war game exercises were used as an operational cover to execute the attacks.

You realize that simply repeating that statement over and over and over again won't make it true, right?
And when are you going to show everyone that these exercises installed images on the radar screens of civilian ATC's?


reply posted on 2-11-2011 @ 10:18 AM by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by hooper
reply to
post by Shadow Herder



No you have not proven that there were almost daily exercises involving mulitple simultaneous hijackings that resulted in the hijackers using the planes as weapons of mass destruction. Not by a long shot.



Dont misquote me again bub! I said "I have proved that they were practicing these types of scenarios almost daily. "

You have proven yourself to have no usable knowledge pertaining to the real events of 911



As you can see exercises almost daily.... like I said.

There were wargames on 9.11 too but that has been classified. Check it yourself.
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 2-11-2011 @ 10:27 AM by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder



Yes, the war games exercises involving multiple live fly hijacked aircraft smashing into buildings planned for September 11 were used as a cover for the real attacks to happen.

You realize that nothing in your posts proves, live fly, or smashing planes into buildings or that exercises installed false images on the radar monitors of civilian ATC or that these exercises were conducted almost daily.


reply posted on 4-11-2011 @ 02:11 PM by Cassius666
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to
post by Shadow Herder



You speak of data related to the exercise appearing on civillian radar as well. Were they taking part in a military exercise while coordinating air traffic?


They are not making any sense. They have no knowledge. They just see TRUTHER- must go against.

There is some damning information presented in this thread. Google amalgam virgo 01. The wargames that occurred during the 911 attacks.


So you never said that the exercise data was displayed on civillian radar as well? At least I was not able to produce the post where you said that, Its something hooper said you said, it would be great if you could clarify it with a line,


reply posted on 7-11-2011 @ 08:56 PM by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cassius666
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to
post by Shadow Herder



You speak..........


They are not making any sense. They have no knowledge. They just see TRUTHER- must go against.

There is some damning information presented in this thread. Google amalgam virgo 01. The wargames that occurred during the 911 attacks.




Bla bla bla....

Wargames on 911. Fact. You lose, truth wins.
edit on 7-11-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
edit on 7-11-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-11-2011 @ 08:44 AM by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder



Bla bla bla....
Wargames on 911. Fact. You lose, truth wins.

Wargames every day. No one cares. Irrelevant. Fact.


reply posted on 8-11-2011 @ 12:02 PM by hooper
reply to post by Cassius666



No wargames that simulate a terrorist attack....

So how often does it happen? Don't forget you've also got to consider military exercises involving all the branches.
reroute fighter aircraft away from the actual terrorist attack, do not happen every day.

Still don't see any evidence of that. However, bear in mind that the attacks took place in Washington, DC and New York City. Not exactly prime spots for military exercises for obvious reasons. One of those obvious reasons was that both targets were within a few miles or less of some of the busiest airports in the world.
And it also does not happen every day that America allows their wargames to impede their surveillance or capability to react to a threat.

Well, that's not true. If there are exercises every day then resources are directed accordingly, every day. So on any given day, if there are terrorist attacks chances are that some military resources that will not be available.


reply posted on 10-11-2011 @ 07:44 AM by hooper
reply to post by Cassius666



Well you would think other squadrons are rotated in, to not leave 120 Million people undefended.

I am not really sure what you mean here. Are you under the impression that there are aircraft constantly patrolling the skies over the USA?
And you dont see a problem with the fact those exercises were conducted only months prior to 911, not every day (At least this exact exercise) and were not conducted after 911 and happened to coincide with 911?

Uh, no, I don't see a problem. You know that terrorism wasn't invented on 9/11/2001, right? And I still see no evidence that any live-fly hijacking, etc. exercises were conducted on 9/11.
And you dont see a problem with the fact, that the exercises were not terminated after the first plane hit and that exercise data kept being fed into the system, making interception very difficult or next to impossible, with the few unarmed and therefore unable to intercept fighter aircraft, that were left behind while several squadrons were rerouted torwards the Canadian boarder?

Actually I don't see anything that says that is a fact. The first plane crash was still a civilian accident. Why would the military suspend its exercises because there was an accident with a civilian aircraft? What data was being fed into what system? Actually there were armed aircraft and what squadrons were routed towards Canada?



OC we dont have to speculate. There have been many credible whistleblowers.


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 07:36 AM by Cassius666
reply to post by hooper



So you are saying America does not have the capabilities to react to a threat in the timspan of about an hour and that there is nothing odd about the fact that not even half a dozen aircraft were on scramble alert armed with 2-4 sidewinders to react to a threat to the east coast.

Well if you feel thats nothing out of the ordinary we will have to agree to disagree.


reply posted on 18-11-2011 @ 07:58 AM by hooper
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to
post by hooper



So you are saying America does not have the capabilities to react to a threat in the timspan of about an hour and that there is nothing odd about the fact that not even half a dozen aircraft were on scramble alert armed with 2-4 sidewinders to react to a threat to the east coast.

Well if you feel thats nothing out of the ordinary we will have to agree to disagree.


That's real easy to say, respond to a threat in an hour, but in practise and in the knoweldge of what happened that day, no we do not neccessarily have the absolute capability to repsond to any kind of threat, anywhere in leass than an hour.


reply posted on 20-11-2011 @ 07:03 PM by Cassius666
reply to post by Shadow Herder



Do you have details on which squadrons exactly were involved in these exercises?
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags