It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
If they have a fairly new account but a lot of posts, especially if they lean the way of the establishment, i.e. the "top turd" lame stream media candidates. More detail is to click on their recent posts and see how far apart minute wise they were from each other. Some people have whole posts quoted and responded to in just a few minutes. Either this is a computer generated response or they are quoting the passage and not really reading it unless they are in mensa and can just type 100 words a minute while reading 100 words a minute and quoting large passages and sometimes multiple passages. But if they are that smart why would they support the lame stream media?edit on 10-10-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kalunom
When was it determined that "disinfo bots" actually exist?
Can you give an example of one on ATS?
Are you a "disinfo bot"?
The U.S. Central Command says its new “Persona” social media "infiltration" software is designed to cozy up to extremist bloggers overseas, not law-abiding Americans chatting on Facebook or similar sites. Earlier this month, the Web buzzed with a report that the software was designed to “manage ‘fake people’ on social media sites and create the illusion of consensus on controversial issues,” implying that the Defense Department was targeting critics of the war in Afghanistan and other conflicts. Further compounding a sinister view of the software was the discovery of e-mails from the head of a company implicated in “dirty tricks” against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and a pro-labor organization, which discussed how such technology could be used.