Aimless Obama walks alone, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 13-10-2011 @ 11:05 AM by xuenchen
reply to post by Indigo5



Your thinking is strange. You seem to think that when I point out BS, that I am defending or making excuses for the President.


I agree !!

My thinking IS strange.

Here is some more.


Obama’s lists of “promises”, Lies and Truths follow a distinct pattern.

Obama’s general pattern of statements and references follow a distinct pattern.

The majority are well written “scripts” by the playwrights that control his media exposures.

This pattern is difficult to maintain.

The majority of “promises” kept are directed at a limited segment of the population and have the least positive impact on the majority of citizens and in some cases actually has a negative impact on the majority of citizens. Same pattern is used for “truths”. Few exceptions exist. Many promises kept and truths are actually meaningless.

The majority of “promises” broken or “compromised” or “incomplete” would have impacted the majority of citizens in positive ways. Same pattern is used for “lies”. Few exceptions exist. Many broken promises and lies, had they been initiated, would have impacted the general citizenry in positive ways.

Legislation passed that impacts the majority of citizens negatively was either generalized, edited after the fact, or “not mentioned” prior to proposal. (Healthcare, looting of Treasury, hidden tax increases, spending and funding, banking laws, budgeting, war funding, etc.) This includes laws we hardly hear about. This includes laws that force increases in costs related to the legislations. This includes executive orders. This includes laws that cost more in tax money than the yield.

Legislation passed that impacts the majority of citizens positively are far and few and most is minimal.

This pattern peaked during Obama’s first 2 years in office.

I have made some references to these patterns in prior posts.
Rebuttals to this theory are welcome. But please, one citation at a time. I am easily confused.

Perhaps a list of accomplishments/failures with a brief summary of impact (positive/negative) is in order (one at a time).

We can sort out the BS.


reply posted on 13-10-2011 @ 12:36 PM by Indigo5
Originally posted by xuenchen
Obama’s lists of “promises”, Lies and Truths follow a distinct pattern.


More or less agree. though I think you assign to much meaning to the pattern.

His list of accomplishments or promises kept?

The easy stuff...done,

the stufff that recieved insane opposition, but was a massive priority? healthcare, financial regulatory reform? Done, but in a half-assed, watered down, compromised fashion due to very large opposition.

Stuff that didn't have large public support or where the American public did not prioritize the issue, plus opposition? Not done or promise broken.

Originally posted by xuenchen
The majority are well written “scripts” by the playwrights that control his media exposures.


That is politifact widdling down a mass of public comments and speeches into a coherent pledge. Nothing sinister about their wording. All of the promises for every politician are worded in a similair way.

Originally posted by xuenchen


Legislation passed that impacts the majority of citizens positively are far and few and most is minimal.


Any legislation that impacts the majority of the population is going to recieve high exposure and high opposition either on pure idealogical grounds or on pure political grounds..."Obama must fail"...often both.

Originally posted by xuenchenThis pattern peaked during Obama’s first 2 years in office.


This goes for all Presidents...the first two years is when you get anything done, the second two years are fierce politics related to election strategy.

edit on 13-10-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 13-10-2011 @ 01:16 PM by xuenchen
reply to post by Indigo5



Originally posted by xuenchen
This pattern peaked during Obama’s first 2 years in office.


This goes for all Presidents...the first two years is when you get anything done, the second two years are fierce politics related to election strategy.


yes, but...

Obama had a full support congress and did nothing but negative productivity.

They all had THEE chance of a lifetime......I repeat THEE chance of a lifetime

.....and did nothing for the U.S. citizens

except loot the taxpayers and every citizen including the unborn.

the agenda HAD to be accomplished as planned.....this maniacal insanity could NOT have been by accident.

Hey wait a minute........maybe they did see THEE opportunity of a lifetime !!

eye it borders on Pathocracy.

edit on Oct-13-2011 by xuenchen because:



reply posted on 13-10-2011 @ 05:02 PM by Indigo5
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to
post by Indigo5



Originally posted by xuenchen
This pattern peaked during Obama’s first 2 years in office.


This goes for all Presidents...the first two years is when you get anything done, the second two years are fierce politics related to election strategy.


yes, but...

Obama had a full support congress and did nothing but negative productivity.



This always cracks me up. The "Full Support of Congress"??? You mean a one vote advantage which allowed the GOP to LITERALLY Filibuster more than any session of congress in history???

You must not know how Congress works.

Did you see what they had to do to pass healthcare?
edit on 13-10-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-10-2011 @ 12:34 AM by xuenchen
reply to post by Indigo5



yes it's true that some "bills" passed by a thin margin....

but still passed.

I sometimes think they take advantage of that situation to maintain the illusion of "hard work"
and eye brow sweating and so nerve racking even though they already know who is voting how.
They make it look like such an accomplishment after "convincing" somebody to go their way.

it looks like those "bills" were just that ..... bills to the public debt at the public's expense.

The devastating legislation that did/will do the most damage is in effect as planned.

After last year's elections, we see a different, amended pattern.

As with the most recent jobs bill, we see Dems that are afraid of voter recoil, and perhaps we are seeing a classic turn around that will prepare everybody for the upcoming landslide of all landslides in 2012.

These people are very very smart and have the best advisory staffs to prepare for any and all disasters.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 18 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags