It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...or employing zero point energy propulsion.
Would an anti-gravity propulsion-driven craft work in space? .. How would it work?
Is space devoid of gravity?
Is gravity limited to celestial bodies like planets, because of magnetic fields?
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by boncho
But...they're not real(?)
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by boncho
But...they're not real(?)
I think you might be on to something.
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by boncho
But...they're not real(?)
Originally posted by Aliensun
reply to post by Cosmic911
It does not take an Einstein to understand clearly what method that UFOs, thus, their deep space vehicles, use to putt-putt about the stars. The UFOs give every evidence of cancelling the entire mass of the ship. No one needs to be a genius to see a UFO make instant stops, starts and changes of direction to see that such maneuvers are impossible without having that feature. It is as simple as that.
So called "anti-gravity" is a term frequently used by those that have a limited grasp of physics (gravity versus mass). I suspect that short-sighted view is actually promoted by TPTB because it is just plain wrong, a red herring. You mention a key point, what good is anti-gravity when you are out between stars where gravity is miniscule?
You can talk about "anti-gravity," "worm holes" and "dimensional jumping," etc. until the UFOs finally do land, but the simple fact that they can shield the mass of their ships is answer enough.
When the late Ben Rich of Lockheed's famed "Skunk Works" stated that we now have the technology to go to the stars, he wasn't talking about rockets.
If you totally remove any thought about any kind of rocket as being our ticket to anywhere out there, then you will be ahead of what TPTB want you to know. Forget alien contact for an instant and consider that the capabilities of their space drive alone is the greatest secret weapon that any earthly government can attain at this stage in our technology. As much as anything else, that is why we still deny the reality of UFOs. And now, we have our own, similar ships, the triangles. [/quote
So, you've seen a UFO, confirmed it was or wasn't terrestrial, shook hands with the pilots, and inspected their method of propulsion. Simple as that, huh? Thanks for the clarification!
Originally posted by rigel4
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by boncho
But...they're not real(?)
I think you might be on to something.
Really........ You should just accept that you're wrong and shutup.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by boncho
But...they're not real(?)
The point of the original question, which I guess I should have clarified, was to help establish (or debunk) the possibility of extraterrestrial life travelling to Earth in space. I was trying to figure out how realistic the possibility is. Not understanding propulsion, anti-gravity, physics, etc, I figured that chances of interplanetary travel is nil if a craft required more than one type of propulsion; one to drive it through space, and another to travel in an atmosphere.
They have already produced light from ZPE (vacuum energy).