It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I am the 1%

page: 5
13
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:24 AM
link   
reply to post by ldyserenity
 


George Carlin huh?

Good resource for comedy.

But not a good resource to solve economic problems.

I will do a search to see if he is a part of the Union or not.

Then well decide who's funny and who's not.




posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Here is a CNN ticker for Tarp:
Follow the money

Relatively unbiased source there I mean it is CNN where the hell did one GD bailout end up in Unions hands? You are spreading lies, ALSO A CREDIT UNION is NOT A "Labor" Union just in case you don't realize that, cause I do realize one credit union is named on the ticker.
PROVE to me a blessed dime went to ANY union, I beleive everyone that got bailouts not a single one dealt with unions except the car company who went and opened up in Mexico to Get away from the unions.

Oh God I don't even know why I am Bothering.
Just prove an ounce of what you type is true. You Can't.

edit on 14-10-2011 by ldyserenity because: spelling



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:32 AM
link   
reply to post by ldyserenity
 


Well CNN is OWNED by socialists/communists/and marxists but I will take a look comrade.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ldyserenity
 


Ok well nothing I wasn't expecting to see.

A bunch of EVIL corporations that the UNIONS are trying to control.



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 01:48 AM
link   
Yeah Im so sorry folks.

Sorry to tell you that OWS is a bunch of pawns to usher in the socialist/communist NWO.

Truth hurts doesn't it?

I know it's the cool thing to do.

And who would dare call out a bunch of ignorant lemmings with their stupid signs advocating socialism and the downfall of capitalism or should I say America?
edit on 14-10-2011 by thehoneycomb because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2011 @ 10:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by thehoneycomb
reply to post by daskakik
 


OK good point but a system where those in power only choose who they like is tyranny.

It is not equality or freedom.

12 is better than 1, but it's probably just as confusing.


First off newcovenant's post never said anything about those in power choosing who they like. The point it made was that wealthy intrests should not be allowed to influence politics. The only power should be the people.

Second it might be a bit more confusing but the forefathers fought, bled and died on the battlefield to implement a system where the people could place representatives in government that best represent their wishes and you think it's too much of a sacrifice to have to research a couple more parties before casting your vote. Really?


edit on 14-10-2011 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 02:18 AM
link   
reply to post by daskakik
 


Yeah, they didn't bleed and die to confuse everybody.

They fought for freedom. Not some one party system or some 13 party system, thats crazy.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by thehoneycomb
 


Right but if the people are not represented by 2 parties then more are needed to fully represent the will of the people. We're a diverse bunch.



posted on Nov, 10 2011 @ 03:02 AM
link   
reply to post by thehoneycomb
 


And I'm a deposed prince of Nigeria.

Say. Want to help me get some money from the bank? You seem like just the sort of person to fall for... I mean, help me out!



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join