posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 01:16 PM
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by neo96
yeah its getting real
real ignorant prove fox lies come on now prove they lie point out their lies.
They all lie. Every media outlet. CNN, Fox news, MSNBC, all of them...
If you don't know this, then you are about the only one on this site who does not....
I would be happy to help you find lies told by ANY news media outlet, but since you are just requesting lies told by Fox News:
^watch that last video in full.
There, Fox News lies. But all News companies and media outlets do. Again, I will be happy to help point out lies told by any media outlet. Because
they all lie. Come on Neo, you know this. Take off your political blinders.
All News lies.
edit on 10-10-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)
Indeed, all mainstream media are fraudulent, establishment-promoting lying sacks of spit.
I watched the Daily Show clip... when treading on "True/False" territory, I think some things come down to context or interpretation. The one that
stood out the most was when they said John Holdren proposing forced abortion and sterilization in water was 'false'.. but again, I think that comes
down to the word 'proposed'. Maybe he didn't officially propose these ideas, or he didn't do it while under the title of 'science czar' or
whatever, but he did ponder these ideas in his book Eco Science, did he not?
Page 837 of Eco Science..
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained
under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary
fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No
such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff
requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and
sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex,
children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
Are they saying that these aren't ideas that he's proposing, just talking about? Again.. It comes down to details of interpretation and context.
I say don't rely on anybody to tell you what is true and what is not. Not Politifact, not Jon Stewart, and certainly no mainstream news network. Go
straight to original sources, do your own research and decide for yourself