posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 04:50 PM
Originally posted by XLR8R
OK, I don't know if this has been posted before but I think this ties in well with the OWS issue. This guy seems to know what he's talking about.
And what he says could very well be used as a manifesto for the OWS protesters, in my opignion. What do you think? Pro's and cons and please...try
to keep it civilized for pete's sake.
Well, I can tell you as a former SIGINT analyst at Ft. Meade (22nd Intel Squadron USAF, NSA) - the modes of collection are extremely outdated, but not
obsolete. For example: we used Windows NT operating systems, but they (the agency) was able to work out the kinks of the system so they stayed with
it... As far as the intel agencies being bloated, oversized toys of the power elite - he says it lightly! Ther'es a reason they don't teach the
analysts there to look into OSINT (Open Source Intelligence); it is because they don't you knowing what everyone else SHOULD know - the truth.
The truth is only available open source when you consider theses analysts look at a computer screen with dits and da's and the scope of collection is
so limited, hence the SCI clearances (Sensitive COMPARTMENTED Intelligence). Even what you "analyze" is COMPARTMENTED and therefore watered down.
The point is that you'll never get the "big" picture, they don't want you to think for yourself - especially when you're responsible for their
secrets...because it's compartmented..
But that's not why I'm making a comment; I'm making one because I agree with everything he said. We need to begin being active in getting the word
out. When he says, "We're the new Paul Revere's" - He's absolutely right. In the famous words of Dr. John, "If I don't do it, you know
somebody else will" and more than likely they're getting paid to play for the other side i.e. disinfo agents. It's officially Us Vs. Them.
Great vid. S & F for you sir.