It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

7 Filthy Rich Zionist Men Own & Control All Mainstream Media & Every Major TV Network in America

page: 2
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 11:48 PM
link   
reply to post by FurvusRexCaeli
 


Nice job.

/thread

Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.
edit on 12-10-2011 by Gemwolf because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 11:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
[SNIP]


thanks a million, i needed the correct current CEOs for my zionism college paper due tomorrow morning, and felt too groggy to look it up one by one, and rense's article is a few yrs old. yayy thx *hug*

Mod Edit: Removed large quote
edit on 12-10-2011 by Gemwolf because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 11:54 PM
link   
you forgot to mention that 4 out of the 5 commissionars in the major sports leagues in north america are zionists.

major league baseball- bud selig
national basketball association- david stern
national hockey league- gary bettman
professional golf association- tim finchem.

and if you want to count major league soccer the commissionar don garbor is also a zionist.

no conspiracy here, it's just a massive anti-semetic coincidence that 5 out of 6 commissionars of all pro sports in n. america are jewish.

and nobody seems to be complaining that they're arent' any black commissionars in sports, like they would if all the commissionars were white.

and to top it off, the only commissionar that isn't jewish, roger goodell, the commissionar of the nfl, the largest and most profitable sports league in the world is also the least paid, took a 25% pay cut last year and has forgone his compensation this year to lower operating costs.

try doing that to the almost bankrupt nhl commissionar, or the massive crook of major league baseball who has so many conflicts of interest that if he were a senator or president he would have been impeached so many times the senate hearing would have lasted decades.

since jews can't be racists, it must just be a job requirement.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 12:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignant
thanks a million, i needed the correct current CEOs for my zionism college paper due tomorrow morning, and felt too groggy to look it up one by one, and rense's article is a few yrs old. yayy thx *hug*

LOL. I'm not new to the internet, or to forums. I've heard the "writing a paper" one before. Next it'll be "I was just joking," then "stop taking everything so seriously." Can we just skip all the face-saving and go right to the part where you ask the mods to delete your thread? Then you can try again in a few weeks and hope no one bothers to double-check your propaganda like I did.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 12:11 AM
link   
Straight from FARK. well done

Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.
edit on 12-10-2011 by Gemwolf because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 12:57 AM
link   
"1917 Congressional Record Confirms Purchase & Manipulation Of The MSM"
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by rstregooski
Alright, meow..

I have seen this claim blasted all over various websites, over and over:




J.P. Morgan Interests Buy 25 of America's Leading Newspapers and Insert Editors

U.S. Congressional Record February 9, 1917, page 2947

Congressman Calloway announced that the J.P. Morgan interests bought 25 of America's leading newspapers, and inserted their own editors, in order to control the media.





The problem in my mind is the fact that this claim is extremely hard to verify online, let alone find any scans of this particular congressional record page showing the actual transcripts. This lack of source or substance is not a very good stance when dealing with the skeptics or "nay-sayers". So I decided to go to my local government depository and pull out the microfilm for this particular record.






Now, Calloway goes on to discuss the danger of falsely reported events as a grounds for American sentiment accepting the United States entry into the ongoing WWI.

Interestingly enough, not even 2 months after Calloway's words are inserted into the official record, the United States of America declared war on Germany (April 6th, 1917)..






Your thoughts?
Good day...



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 01:08 AM
link   
The OP true colors right here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Same Anti Semitic crap in disguise. The same people that you will find in these boards, accusing Jews for both world wars, deny the Holocaust, ring of spies on 9.11 and their morning toothache.



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 01:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by gravitational
The OP true colors right here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Same Anti Semitic crap in disguise. The same people that you will find in these boards, accusing Jews for both world wars, deny the Holocaust, ring of spies on 9.11 and their morning toothache.


If we all linked selected text /threads to discredit other members expressing their democratic right to an opinion..then ATS would just be a History lesson on members threads/posts.

I am not anti- jewish no more than Iam anti-muslim...if they don't try and destroy my culture/heritage/traditions/beliefs.

THe Op may just be concerned due to the very high ratio of Jews is prominent positions throughout the western world...in relation to their population on Planet Earth.

He has the right to express his opinion and to bring facts to the table.

Whether anyone in the west who are non Jews care about the numbers is more pertinent....I would say most are too afraid to say anything abot Jews in general...this breeds fanatics in my opinion.

Bring it out for discussion...and let human beings decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong.

Discrediting anyone opposing your own belief is just breeding hate.



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 04:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Dr Expired
 


I have no problem with people expressing their opinions.
However, any thread that begins with “ 7 Filthy Rich Zionist Men “ , is a part of a smear campaign.
Not only the was the op proven false by FurvusRexCaeli, but it showed there was no attempt to make a real research, but to spread rubbish.

Playing dumb is easy, when your readers do not make the slightest effort to dig dipper.
Ignant's agenda is clear once you go through his posts. I have zero tolerance to this new age anti-Semitic idiots in disguise, and I'm being very careful when labeling someone as an anti-Semitic.
The problem with this new age Antisemitism, Holocaust deniers, history revisionists etc' is the belief we are all 10 year old ignorant sheep who are looking for scapegoats to accuse for the world's illness instead of looking in the mirror first.



Discrediting anyone opposing your own belief is just breeding hate.


Now that's funny. Isn't that exactly what he was trying to do? Save the face-saving hypocrisy for someone else please.



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 04:28 AM
link   
you guys are still throwing around Jewish left and right. do we not realize both Christians and Jews (and perhaps other Abrahamics) can be Zionists?

and that not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Zionists are Jews? its not about religion its about political affiliations of those in power (duh).

anyways, i was wrong about most all the CEOs since i pasted from rense article which is supposedly from only a few yrs ago yet even back then it would have been wrong.

and someone pointed out one of the new CEOs wrote a letter or something that confirms he isnt Zionist. so clearly, i am wrong. all 7 CEOs can't be Zionists!



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 04:40 AM
link   
reply to post by ignant
 


Stop pretending will you. This starting to make me sick.
You wrote “ Filthy Zionists “ (the rense article states 7 Jews) and they all just happen to be Jews, right ?



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 10:59 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 11:17 AM
link   
Do you personally know that each one of these men want Israel to be the jewish state. If they are zionists what differance does that make for Israel. If they happened to be Muslim/ Buddhist or whatever would you be saying the same ?

Personally i dont think either side deserve to have Israel/Palestine untill both sides grow the hell up. but that's for another thread altogether



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 11:22 AM
link   
each company listed is publicly owned and the shareholders and the board of directors control the hiring and firing of the upper level of management so, unless you can show me the percentage of owners that are zionists, I am going to assume that ownership is spread across the various faiths in a manner similar to the various populations around the globe.

What this means is that, if you think these 7 men (the 7 that are currently holding the positions, not the ones you found on a hate site from 2005) are controlling the media on behalf of some zionist conspiracy, you should blame the shareholders which are, I'm guessing, primarily of a mixed faith but, mostly, christian.

of course, jesus was a jew and he was, most definitely, the ultimate zionist so, I guess, that makes all christians zionists.


must be true, I read it on a blog in my mind and you have already shown us that those evil zionist christians have put a bunch of evil zionists into the top offices of 6 media companies (you counted seagrams twice which, by the way, means the evil zionists control a large portion of your booze too).



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 11:32 AM
link   
reply to post by ignant
 


So now that you have identified the "enemy" .....

What do you propose to do about it?

Is this another anti zionist rallying thread?



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 05:46 PM
link   
Interview with anti-Jewish protester



Mod Edit:

15k.) Video links/embeds: You will not embed or Post a link to a video without a reasonable description of its content and why it interests you, is germane to the topics discussed on the Websites or the topic of an existing thread should you post it in a reply to an existing thread.

edit on 12-10-2011 by Gemwolf because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
What does this have to do with the middleeast?

And, secondly, some of the above named men arent even Zonists!

Youre just using the word Zionist as a euphemism for Jew.



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by ignant
 


filthy zionists? filthy jews?
You are both ignorant and misinformed. Try attending a college where factual history is taught. Relying on the fictional, racist crap merely keeps you a slave to your pathetic victim mentality. Sadly, you will remain an angry, ignorant member of the underclass that is perpetuated by the people who teach you this drivel. You are a life member of the collective human race. Try to be an asset to it. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.



posted on Oct, 31 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignant

like i said, couldnt find a new video & doubted ownerships have changed much since then, so thanks for correction.

are there any more corrections? (for those who somewhat agree with this list anyways)

1. Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner

2. BOB IGER CEO of Walt Disney Co

3. Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd

4. Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios

5. Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc

6. Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric

7. Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited


and is this the person that supposedly owns all of them, really?

en.wikipedia.org...


Wow! According to your Wiki reference Vivendi, it appears that many of the same companies/men you listed keep trading back and forth....kind of like trading baseball cards.

Amazing if the article is true



posted on Oct, 31 2011 @ 04:47 PM
link   
reply to post by ThePublicEnemyNo1
 


Yeah, that is one strange company.
I use it to show people that there is a company that owns almost everything in media, and that means bad business for us.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join