It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
If you were a TRUE Christian, you'd reject money.
I can imagine Jesus charging a dollar a fish, 50 cents for a loaf and $100 for a healing. (not)
Jesus would have been a socialist, spreading the wealth. (which I'm all for being a leftie)
edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)
That is the biggest load of crap I have heard in the last week.
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Sunlionspirit
Don't bother bringing my age into this? So, I must be VERY old. More pompous grassiness from you. What if I tell you I am a VERY OLD SOUL and this has nothing to do with chronological age.
This is not about being old-fashioned. Marxism was never right from the start. Marxism predates my chronological age anyway.
Even Karl Marx got his own philosophy screwed up. Oh yes he also had a MAID and I hear he also attended a Satanic secret society.edit on 9-10-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
if you are a very old soul, then you should understand better what it's all about .....
sorry, I think you made a wrong reincarnation here .....
How can there exist a common objective when members [of The Order of Skull and Bones] are apparently acting in opposition to one another?
Probably the most difficult task in this work will be to get across to the reader what is really an elementary observation: that the objective of The Order is neither "left" nor "right." "Left" and "right" are artificial devicces to bring about change, and the extremes of political left and political right are vital elements in a process of controlled change.
The answer to this seeming political puzzle lies in Hegelian logic. Remember that both Marx and Hitler, the extremes of "left" and "right" presented as textbook enemies, evolved out of the same philosophical system: Hegelianism. That brings screams of intellectual anguish from Marxists and Nazis, but is well known to any student of political systems.
In the Hegelian system conflict is essential. Furthermore, for Hegel and systems based on Hegel, the State is absolute. The State requires complete obedience from the individual citizen. An individual does not exist for himself in these so-called organic systems but only to perform a role in the operation of the State...
So who or what is the State? Obviously it's a self-appointed elite. It is interesting that Fichte, who developed these ideas before Hegel, was a freemason, almost certainly Illuminati, and certainly was promoted by the Illuminati. For example, Johann Wolfgang Goethe (Abaris in the Illuminati code) pushed Fichte for an appointment at Jena University.
Furthermore, the Illuminati principle that the end justifies the means, a principle that Quigley scores as immoral and used by both The Group [Millner / Rhodes Round Table] and The Order, is rooted in Hegel.
College textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiation into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.
Western textbooks also have gigantic gaps. For example, after World War II the Tribunals set up to investigate Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any materials recording Western assistance to Hitler. By the same token, Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms and banks.
Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Never in Western textbooks will you find the evidence that revolutions need finance and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.
Originally posted by Attrei
reply to post by Sunlionspirit
I support the Idea of what the Tea Party represents. They are just as much of a example of the first amendment as the OWS meetings are. My local Tea Party group had nearly the same ideas as the OWS group here. Was rather interesting. I support the Constitution. Regretfully our government has slipped from being a Democratic Republic and has become more of an oligarchy.
Here is from my home area's OWS meeting. Feel free to share it around.
NEW YORK — Nobody in New York government has the expertise and authority to oversee the police department's secret intelligence operations, a leading city councilman says, raising questions about what checks exist on a department that has infiltrated mosques and subjected entire Muslim neighborhoods to surveillance and scrutiny.
Peter Vallone, the chairman of the council's Public Safety Committee, said the council doesn't have the power to subpoena the NYPD for its intelligence records. And even if it did, he said the operations are too sophisticated for city officials to effectively oversee. More oversight is likely needed, he said, perhaps from the federal government.
"That portion of the police department's work should probably be looked at by a federal monitor," he said after Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly testified Thursday at City Hall.
If the council cannot oversee the intelligence division, it's unclear who can. The NYPD's intelligence unit is a politically sensitive topic for Washington, which has invested more than $1.6 billion in the department since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Congress and Obama administration officials say they also have no authority to monitor the day-to-day intelligence operations of the NYPD
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.
In other words, socialized medicine. In order to get an idea of what a disaster this would be, look at any other unfair monopoly set-up by the government. The Post Office comes to mind. It is now bankrupt and on the skids. Business free of government regulation and taxation always delivers goods and services more effectively than government. Monopolistic practices by government results in the destruction of wealth and ultimately the bread line.
The current deplorable state of health care is a direct result of government enforcing monopolies and eliminating competition in the marketplace. The elimination of competition invariably leads to expensive and substandard services.
Wall Street does not represent small competitive business. It is a haven for the monopoly men who took over the government in the late 19th century – JP Morgan, the Rockefellers, and the international bankers – the same elite interests that instituted a national income tax and the Federal Reserve.
We cannot heal as a nation until we move beyond the false left-right paradigm!
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
calm down calm down, peace and love ....
I do NOT want to insult you ... ok ?
I just want to tell you that I want to know what YOU will do to stop this foolish world going mad ok ???
what will you do ???
protest ?
I think you will do nothing but blablabla about marxism and socialism ... but fight for a better world ??
oh no, of course not because it would be a marxist one ???
have a nice day tomorrow, I hope you like Monsanto frankenfood GMO corn and you like fish with BP oil spill dressing, because if you do not want us to control those corporations well tomorrow you will be a poisoned christian ..
with love from jesus.
Nobody in New York government has the expertise and authority to oversee the police department's secret intelligence operations, a leading city councilman says, raising questions about what checks exist on a department that has infiltrated mosques and subjected entire Muslim neighborhoods to surveillance and scrutiny.
Peter Vallone, the chairman of the council's Public Safety Committee, said the council doesn't have the power to subpoena the NYPD for its intelligence records. And even if it did, he said the operations are too sophisticated for city officials to effectively oversee. More oversight is likely needed, he said, perhaps from the federal government.
"That portion of the police department's work should probably be looked at by a federal monitor," he said after Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly testified Thursday at City Hall.
If the council cannot oversee the intelligence division, it's unclear who can. The NYPD's intelligence unit is a politically sensitive topic for Washington, which has invested more than $1.6 billion in the department since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Congress and Obama administration officials say they also have no authority to monitor the day-to-day intelligence operations of the NYPD.
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
yeah it's a BP disaster because of no state control of security and $$$ greedy corporations with Halliburton, but you attack Obama for it instead of BP ???
come on, I am tired of your talk !
so the laws were voted when Bush was in office and it's Obama who gets the guilty card ?
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
yeah it's a BP disaster because of no state control of security and $$$ greedy corporations with Halliburton, but you attack Obama for it instead of BP ???
come on, I am tired of your talk !
so the laws were voted when Bush was in office and it's Obama who gets the guilty card ?
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
yeah it's a BP disaster because of no state control of security and $$$ greedy corporations with Halliburton, but you attack Obama for it instead of BP ???
come on, I am tired of your talk !
so the laws were voted when Bush was in office and it's Obama who gets the guilty card ?
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
If you were a TRUE Christian, you'd reject money.
I can imagine Jesus charging a dollar a fish, 50 cents for a loaf and $100 for a healing. (not)
Jesus would have been a socialist, spreading the wealth. (which I'm all for being a leftie)
edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
If you were a TRUE Christian, you'd reject money.
I can imagine Jesus charging a dollar a fish, 50 cents for a loaf and $100 for a healing. (not)
Jesus would have been a socialist, spreading the wealth. (which I'm all for being a leftie)
edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)edit on 9-10-2011 by JonoEnglish because: (no reason given)
Hey there, quiet down. The conservatives don't want to hear that their precious mythological figure known as Jesus would've been a ...gasp...SOCIALIST.