Perhaps a person is singled out because they do show self confidence that others do not ? It may be taken as a threat by them that they are lacking .
Whether it be on the job skills or something else . Their adapting to a situation that have been used to shuffling off to new workers to keep them in
their current position . Possible .
Do we not tend to gravitate to more confident people while others see them as competition to get rid of ?
Scenario , a seasoned worker who is relied on when the times get tough . Their quality is of a high scale than some others , even though there is no
real quality control to speak of . ( minimum acceptability ) The seasoned worker uses a higher pay grade of equipment . Unseasoned workers want to
make the same as the seasoned worker does but is not that reliable in the bosses eyes .
The unseasoned workers continue to keep the minimal standards and less as part of their daily routine . They are still getting paid a higher rate at
this job than they would at the same at a different company that does the same . The unseasoned workers have been seen doing the lesser quality work
but do not get disciplined for the lack of performance but the seasoned worker does get disciplined when he or she happens to drop their performance .
Since he or she sees that the rest can get away with it and still get the higher wage he or she gets tired of it and does the same as the unseasoned
workers are doing .
A ring leader emerges to rally the unseasoned workers to rid the company of the seasoned worker so they all can move up the pay scale . Little do some
realize is that they will still then have to deal with the ring leader later on in the same scenario . It becomes a perpetual scenario .
This has resulted from management placing divisions between the two different shifts .
Good business practice ? I think not .
Throw in nepotism in the workplace and the scenario changes for all concerned .
edit on 9-10-2011 by watchdog8110 because: (no reason
given)