This topic is in the Science & Technology discussion forum.  (rss)


Are these chemtrials or contrails?


<<  3    4    5    6  >>



reply posted on 8-3-2005 @ 09:04 PM by HowardRoark


How many times does that Kucinich B.S. have to be debunked?

Even Kucinich admited he had been hoaxed.

"I'm not into that." were his exact words when asked about "chemtrails."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-3-2005 @ 09:10 PM by HybridEB


Why would impractical and nonexistent weapon systems be used in a congressional document?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-3-2005 @ 09:33 PM by HowardRoark


Because Kucinich is a fool.

It seems he let his staff prepare the bill without checking it over fully. Someone on that staff allowed Laurie Kramer, a renowed chemtrail believer, to influence the language of that bill.

After his bill was introduced, and the after laughter died down, Kucinich withdrew it and reworded it, taking the chemtrails reference out, but the damage to his reputation had already been done.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  3    4    5    6  >>
























ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.082 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread