9/11 and Cyberterrorism: Did the real "cyber 9/11" happen on 9/11?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 11-10-2011 @ 01:41 PM by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to
post by waypastvne



You have been debunked and proven ignorant in every 911 thread you post on, I dont know why you bother here as well.

Read the first post young man and try to refute the evidence point by point rather than regurgitate nonsensical rants.
edit on 11-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)


Here is one
For two years prior to 9/11, Ptech was working to identify potential problems or weaknesses in the FAA's response plans to events like a terrorist hijacking of a plane over U.S. airspace. According to their own business plan for their contract with the FAA, Ptech was given access to every process and system in the FAA dealing with their crisis response protocols. This included examining key systems and infrastructure to analyze the FAA's "network management, network security, configuration management, fault management, performance management, application administration, network management and user desk help operations." In short, Ptech had free reign to examine every FAA system and process for dealing with the exact type of event that was to occur on 9/11. Even more incredible, researcher Indira Singh points out that Ptech was specifically analyzing the potential interoperability problems between the FAA, NORAD and the Pentagon in the event of an emergency over U.S. airspace.
edit on 11-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)


So you can't give me a description of what the FAAs does. I didn't think so.

The FAA's major roles include:
Regulating U.S. commercial space transportation
Regulating air navigation facilities' geometry and flight inspection standards
Encouraging and developing civil aeronautics, including new aviation technology
Issuing, suspending, or revoking pilot certificates
Regulating civil aviation to promote safety, especially through local offices called Flight Standards District Offices
Developing and operating a system of air traffic control and navigation for both civil and military aircraft
Researching and developing the National Airspace System and civil aeronautics
Developing and carrying out programs to control aircraft noise and other environmental effects of civil aviation

Are you going to explain how Ptech pulled off 911. Or are you just going say there is a company called Ptech owned by jews, and a government agency called the FAA and leave it to the truthers imagination to fill in the blanks ?


reply posted on 11-10-2011 @ 01:50 PM by ProudBird
reply to post by Shadow Herder



THIS is the reality of how things work at the FAA and ATC:













This is the way it went down, as people (professionals) dealt with the events in real time, in the sometimes chaotic way that such things happen, and people react.


reply posted on 11-10-2011 @ 04:39 PM by waypastvne
reply to post by Shadow Herder



Your stupid Truther Mistake was choosing the FAA to team up your Petch crap evidence with, The FAA doesn't control or monitor anything in real time. They are a before and after the fact agency. They try to prevent accidents, chose someone to blame after accidents and make stupid rules in between. The only way the FAA would know whats going on in the sky at any given point in time is to go out side and look up. If a bunch of FAA employes came in to an ATC and took over, they wouldn't know what to do or how to do it. The FAA does not control the skies, they regulate the skies.


reply posted on 11-10-2011 @ 11:08 PM by Cecilofs
reply to post by waypastvne



I don't know what role if any the FAA played. The point is if you have information on how the systems work and especially where the problems are, then you can potentially exploit those problems.

In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.

Note the use of the words "possibly" and "potentially".


reply posted on 12-10-2011 @ 04:24 PM by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to
post by waypastvne



In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.


This evidence surely seems to suggest that.


reply posted on 12-10-2011 @ 04:28 PM by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to
post by waypastvne



In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.


This evidence surely seems to suggest that.


Where exactly does it suggest that ? Be specific.


reply posted on 12-10-2011 @ 04:50 PM by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by Cecilofs
reply to
post by waypastvne



In this case, since the software was running on those systems at the time, then its possible it was doing more than monitoring and possibly contributed to the confusion which meant that there was no intercept of the jets.


This evidence surely seems to suggest that.


Where exactly does it suggest that ? Be specific.


I am starting to believe now that you are imbalanced or have some sort of deficiency. Read and watch the videos kiddo. Sigh and dont stalk my threads with such ignorance. Its annoying.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags