It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The opportunity for existence comes from non-existence and death puts you in non-existence thereby giving you that opprotunity.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The previous me ceases action and existence at death. But life can arise from non-existence.
What happens if we apply extreme circumstances to your theory?
Let's say that a huge object from space strikes the earth and completely disintegrates the planet, thereby destroying all life as we know it. You are now non existent. By what mechanism do you begin to exist again? What happens if there is never a method to exist again? Are we trapped in this afterlife?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The opportunity for existence comes from non-existence and death puts you in non-existence thereby giving you that opprotunity.
I disagree. There is no "you" following death that benefits from opportunity.
If so, you are not non-existent.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Yes. We are trapped.
To put it another way using different words: There is non-existence before and after life. The fact that non-existence preceded life implies the FACT that life can arise from non-existence. Since this is the case, then the period of non-existence after this life has the opportunity for another life arising. It's simple and it's obvious.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Yes. We are trapped.
Then we cannot have the quality of non-existence. You assert there exists a "we" that is subject to action "trapped".
Originally posted by Morg234
To put it another way using different words: There is non-existence before and after life. The fact that non-existence preceded life implies the FACT that life can arise from non-existence. Since this is the case, then the period of non-existence after this life has the opportunity for another life arising. It's simple and it's obvious.
Through natural and biological means, though.
And to be honest I genuinely believe we are not "dead" before we are born, since there is no-one to be dead; we are nothing before conception (or whatever biological starting point of choice).
For me, that indescribable nothingness that was before our birth is an example of what it is like to be without any sentience, to be without neural and cognitive functions. Why would it be different in death, when we effectively return to the state of before our birth? (Apart from a pile of bones, or a few ashes that is!)
Originally posted by humphreysjim
I think your reasoning may hold if you assume some things about existence that may be true, but are not, at this stage, facts.
Namely:
1) that there are an infinite number of parallel Universes
2) everything that is possible, will happen somewhere in that multiverse
3) an exact replica of you generated in a parallel Universe would truly be "you"
If we accept the above as true, which is not ridiculous, then yes, we will exist, and continue to exist, somewhere, for eternity.edit on 7-10-2011 by humphreysjim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Its simple.
Before you were born, you were dead, and now you are alive. So when you die again, it makes perfect logic sense that you will have another opprotunity for life.
Now, that doesn't mean that there is a heaven or hell, it simply means there is definitely life after death as before this life, you were dead, or not alive (same thing), and now you're alive. Life after death.edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)
To put it another way using different words:
There is non-existence before and after life. The fact that non-existence preceded life implies the FACT that life can arise from non-existence. Since this is the case, then the period of non-existence after this life has the opportunity for another life arising. It's simple and it's obvious.edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VelvetSplash
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Its simple.
Before you were born, you were dead, and now you are alive. So when you die again, it makes perfect logic sense that you will have another opprotunity for life.
Now, that doesn't mean that there is a heaven or hell, it simply means there is definitely life after death as before this life, you were dead, or not alive (same thing), and now you're alive. Life after death.edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)
To put it another way using different words:
There is non-existence before and after life. The fact that non-existence preceded life implies the FACT that life can arise from non-existence. Since this is the case, then the period of non-existence after this life has the opportunity for another life arising. It's simple and it's obvious.edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)edit on 6-10-2011 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)
Your logic is flawed.
That is not to say there isn't life outside what we experience now, or that we have/have not lived other lives, in similar or other forms before or after this one - just that your "evidence" for it is illogical.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Non-existence is the quality of their being no quality
and even disclusive to that quality.
Before you were born, unless there is an intermediate existence between lives, you were non-existent, and after you die, you will be non-existent. How is that logic flawed?
Originally posted by TechUnique
reply to post by smithjustinb
I don't understand how your OP proves afterlife is a fact but I do know what does prove an afterlife of some form. We release energy from our bodies when we die, this cannot be destroyed but instead infuses with the surroundings somehow.
If we are buried we nourish the surrounding environment in some way.
Regardless of all that personally I believe we do have a soul of some kind and I believe we experience a lot more than this one lifetime.
Originally posted by humphreysjim
reply to post by smithjustinb
Your post above helped clarify what you're trying to say. It's interesting, and I must admit it has me thinking.
I'm thinking your theory is perhaps based on a misconception on what it means to be "you". It is definitely implying some sort of soul, since you are suggesting that "I" had a chance of existing before I was born. In the strict materialistic view of the Universe, "I" don't have a chance to exist before birth, because "I" is a meaningless description, as it is inherently tied in to our material body and the exact configuration of our brain. "I" will become meaningless after I am dead, too.
The problem is that we don't understand what consciousness really is, yet, so we don't really understand what "I" means.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by humphreysjim
reply to post by smithjustinb
Your post above helped clarify what you're trying to say. It's interesting, and I must admit it has me thinking.
I'm thinking your theory is perhaps based on a misconception on what it means to be "you". It is definitely implying some sort of soul, since you are suggesting that "I" had a chance of existing before I was born. In the strict materialistic view of the Universe, "I" don't have a chance to exist before birth, because "I" is a meaningless description, as it is inherently tied in to our material body and the exact configuration of our brain. "I" will become meaningless after I am dead, too.
The problem is that we don't understand what consciousness really is, yet, so we don't really understand what "I" means.
I don't know why people keep saying that I'm thinking that identity transcends death, because that's not the message I'm trying to convey. I am saying that you have an identity in existence, and then you die, and your identity dies as well. But from non-existence comes the opportunity for another existence which allows for the development of a new "you".
It is no different. The state after death is the same as it is before birth. Therefore, after you die, and fade away into non-existence, there is the opportunity for existence again.