It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1 John 4:3: “Every inspired expression that does not confess Jesus does not originate with God. Furthermore, this is the antichrist’s inspired expression which you have heard was coming, and now it is already in the world.”
Originally posted by Red Cloak
Read the Bible again in Genesis. It clearly states that Abel was born after Cain, after Adam had sex with Eve.
The Bible lists one sexual encounter, bearing two separate sons. So either they were twins, or they had different fathers. It is obviously clear and simple to see, as that is how it is written in Genesis.
And it does not state in the Bible that they were twins either............edit on 6-10-2011 by Red Cloak because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Red Cloak
We already pay taxes, Herman Cain just has a different tax plan. It isn't a mark or a limit on commerce.
Now, I do believe in the Mark, and it is coming, but it has nothing to do with a Tax Plan and Herman Cain is not nearly well-liked or charismatic enough to pull off the false-prophet gig.
Originally posted by Sparky63
reply to post by Red Cloak
The word "Antichrist" does not appear anywhere in the book of Revelations. Your linking it to the Beast mentioned in Rev chap 13 has no basis.
Keep in mind that the Apostle John said that the Antichrist was already present in his day.
1 John 4:3: “Every inspired expression that does not confess Jesus does not originate with God. Furthermore, this is the antichrist’s inspired expression which you have heard was coming, and now it is already in the world.”
That was written near the end of the first century C.E.
So the Antichrist was already present in the the first century. It therefore cannot represent a single individual. Especially one alive today. You can rest assured that Herman Cain is not the Antichrist.
edit on 10/6/2011 by Sparky63 because: added comment
TextHowever, it was Rep. Michele Bachmann, in Hanover, N.H., who set the standard. About candidate Cain's intention to give Congress a revenue stream it currently doesn't have – the authority to levy a national sales tax – Rep. Bachmann quipped: "When you take the 9-9-9 plan and turn it upside down [666], the devil's in the details."