It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GLontra
Who called Trisha "a monster"? Not me. Just want that she pays her fair share in taxes.
Nobody got rich ALONE. She got help from her employees to get rich. Without them, she would never go anywhere. Her employees helped to generate wealth.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
I see. So you are now stating that you are in favor of welfare and food stamps while we all work to become millionaires? Because without welfare and food stamps, her story is not possible. And from what I have seen of your posts, in the past you havent agreed with food stamps or welfare. Hell, the tone of this post you wrote seems to be against any assistance at all, while posting the experieces of a woman who became a millionaire after using social programs for at least a year.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
I don't buy it. When I see the image below, I shake my head. Regardless, I don't see the calling for a "select 1%".
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
Everyone knows OWS is not targeting successful business owners. They are targeting the wall street, CEO, and banking fraudsters.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
I see. So you are now stating that you are in favor of welfare and food stamps while we all work to become millionaires? Because without welfare and food stamps, her story is not possible. And from what I have seen of your posts, in the past you havent agreed with food stamps or welfare. Hell, the tone of this post you wrote seems to be against any assistance at all, while posting the experieces of a woman who became a millionaire after using social programs for at least a year.
I have no problem with social programs. I do, however, have a problem with people who use them their entire life, and then it becomes one generation after another. Personally, I think her example is a great "hand up" approach to getting people out of poverty.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
reply to post by trika3000
I "understand" the argument. I "get it". Really, I do. In fact, I get it so much that I thought the Tea Party was the answer, and I still think it has good fundamental ideas. What saddens me is that the ORIGINAL Tea Party principals and ideas have been hijacked by the corporations. The OSW movement may have started out along many of the same lines, and I'm sure there are a LOT of things that the Tea Party and OWS movements agree 100% on, but now OWS has been hijacked by the CP and the leftist militants like Van Jones. That being said, it's only going to further the divide in this country.
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Alllright. So now you are saying you are OK with social programs, as long as everyone eventually becomes a millionaire. What happens to those who dont become millionaires? The rules of capitalism dont allow everyone to be millionaires, especially when the rules are written by the already wealthy. So if they cant become a millionaire within a set period of time, they just are kicked off welfare and their descendants not allowed to claim public assistance?
Your views dont seem very well thought out.
Originally posted by Mindweaver
Being somebody of means isnt the problem here nor should it be.
Monopolies and Corporatism is! When large multinationals dictate to supposedly sovereign Governments then we have a problem
Originally posted by GLontra
Where are those employees who helped Trisha to make her first million back in the 80's ? How many of them are unemployed now? How many get their homes foreclosured in the recent crisis?
Why Trisha should not pay taxes to fund the Welfare for those people?
Originally posted by trika3000
But that is the beauty of it is it's leaderless so it can't really be hijacked... If you watch the feeds for awhile you'll see all different types and kinds speaking. My twitter feeds don't even have the Anonymous members agreeing... The TP movement was a political movement, this is a human movement - and sure the politicals will try and edge in but they is more room as it's a human movement and is taking place on the internet. The TP took place in the MSM and lost out. That's why youngsters deemed the TP as oldfashioned... This isn't going to be stopped it's everywhere... This is evolution not revolutionedit on 6-10-2011 by trika3000 because: i gotta go to sleep
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by navy_vet_stg3
A person making a couple of million in a small, incorporated business does not make them part of the 1%. In fact, it barely makes them upper-middle class which is currently evaporating.
So, no, we don't hate this woman, we want to help create many more folks like her.
We need a whole lot more millionairres, and a whole lot less billionairres!
The 2011 Billionaires List breaks two records: total number of listees (1,210) and combined wealth ($4.5 trillion). This horde surpasses the gross domestic product of Germany, one of only six nations to have fewer billionaires this year. BRICs led the way: Brazil, Russia, India and China produced 108 of the 214 new names. These four nations are home to one-in-four members, up from one-in-ten five years ago. Before this year, only the U.S. had ever produced more than 100 billionaires. China now has 115 and Russia 101.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
She took the initiative to lead. We need leaders. We need creators. THAT is why she made millions and you didn't. You sat in your office, content with working for some other random creator or leader. If you want to make millions, you're going to have to change how you live your life.
No, it won't be easy. She was going to college and working long hours and worrying about her kids. You will have to work extremely hard the first 10 to 20 years to get yourself going.
If it was easy, everyone would be millionaires. These 1% had the courage and perseverance to do it. The 99% don't. They want to be credited for something they didn't accomplish.
It comes down to discipline and strength of will.
Again, credit where credit is due. Excuses do not pay the bills. Get to work.
There're a LOT of 99 percenters that're looking for work. You won't have trouble finding employees. That's somethign that creators and leaders have going for them. They're resourceful.
I'm not saying the 99 percenters are dumb. But they usually don't do what it takes.
So I guess this post shows where I stand on this issue. I am not anti-rich. I support them. They have tried harder than anybody else to control their lives and win. They deserve the reward.edit on 6-10-2011 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
True, nobody gets rich 100% on their own. And, lazy asses NEVER get rich, unless they hit the lottery. You get rich by hard work, dedication and sacrifice. At the end of it, you should be able to enjoy the fruits of your labor.
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
Everyone knows OWS is not targeting successful business owners. They are targeting the wall street, CEO, and banking fraudsters.