It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Terrorists Need To Sing Soprano

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 05:43 AM
link   
Terrorists need to be taught a tough lesson. You can't try to negotiate with them, because it simply doesn't work and only shows weakness. Yeah, that's how they view this. You need to strike them where it hurts the most - literally and figuratively.

Just deprive them of their jewels. Castrate them. This will teach them a lesson they will never forget and the sheer humiliation is going to make sure they will never strike again. Chances are, they will off themselves.

As simple as that. Problem solved. History shows it.




posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 05:59 AM
link   
This sort of thing used to happen, yet we still have terrorists.

It didn't work then, what makes you think it will now? Where is the logic.



posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 06:06 AM
link   
Why not just stop doing the things that cause the terrorist to exist? You know like invading their countries killing their families crazy little things like that.



posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by manturnedintoagirl
 


Would kind of take away that "40 virgins" motive, wouldn't it?



posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 09:58 AM
link   
reply to post by manturnedintoagirl
 


One mans terrorist, is another mans freedom fighter, how do you define a terrorist.

And as Buster said above.



Why not just stop doing the things that cause the terrorist to exist? You know like invading their countries killing their families crazy little things like that.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMaverick
 


I define terrorism as the deliberate (vs. collateral) targeting of civilians in order to further a political agenda.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 03:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Gazrok
 





I define terrorism as the deliberate (vs. collateral) targeting of civilians in order to further a political agenda.


So under your definition of terrorism, is it fair to say, NATO are terrorist's, funded by American and EU tax dollars ?

And with that said, we inadvertently support terrorism with one hand, while decreeing it with the other ?



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 11:33 PM
link   
You catch a terrorist and take his balls, he isn't going to stop being a terrorist. He is just going to hate you more and be more willing to strap a bomb to his chest. Sure, he may kill himself. But he will most likely be taking a few people with him.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join