It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA Did Not Warn Us Of The Asteroid SE58 That Almost Hit Earth. They Were Unsure Of Its Orbit.

page: 1
32
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+18 more 
posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer




posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   
Again with the asteroids? Part of the NWO plan to create global slavery.:



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   


Several meteors hit.


I believe those would be meteorites...




posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:12 PM
link   
[color=dodgerblue]I am not sure that I am understanding properly...

But it says that the first observation used was September 21st 2011.

So they really weren't sure since they only had a week's worth of observations to use for the calculation. The data arc span is only six days.

Does this mean it was only first observed on the 21st then?

Not very comforting. Not that I have a lot of confidence in NASA anyway..[color=deepskyblue]Edited To Add: This asteroid was only rated a one on the Torino scale.


Torino Scale (max.) The maximum detected hazard rating using the Torino Impact Hazard Scale. According to this ten-point scale, a rating of zero indicates the event has "no likely consequences." A Torino Scale rating of 1 indicates an event that "merits careful monitoring." Even higher ratings indicate that progressively more concern is warranted. The Torino Scale is defined only for potential impacts less than 100 years in the future.


So not really too significant.
edit on 5-10-2011 by daryllyn because: (no reason given)


neo.jpl.nasa.gov...
edit on 5-10-2011 by daryllyn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho


Several meteors hit.


I believe those would be meteorites...



No it was an asteroid...did you look on the NASA link I provided. It was 60 feet wide.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:14 PM
link   
reply to post by daryllyn
 


No I do not have a lot of confidence in NASA either. That is what is says that they started observing it then. I really don't trust anything they say or do.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer


Kinda sheds light on those recent NASA memorandums to it's employees to expect something?



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:17 PM
link   
If I remember correctly, it was a very very small asteroid? And it was not supposed to come even 1LD near us. 2011 TO came even closer than this one on September 28th.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by loveguy

Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer


Kinda sheds light on those recent NASA memorandums to it's employees to expect something?


Sorry to tell you this but I think those warning were for the coming asteroid YU55 that is 1400 feet and coming very close to earth on November 9, 2011...the same day Obama is taking over the emergency broadcast system. Type in November 9, 2011... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

Obamas takeover of the emergency broadcast system... www.fema.gov...
theintelhub.com...



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Deadscreameyes
 


Did you look on the NASA site that I provided. It came closer to us than our moon. If they were sure of the orbit it would be a little more comforting but they were not...it was a code 7.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
According to JPL's diagram there when set to hours, this little sucker came 148,000 miles and change. .62 LD. Yeah, I would have been interested in knowing this was going past. Then again, perhaps it's for the best. This was too small to have done much of anything but people would have flipped even further given the timing.

Look at the bright side... It'll be 2052/2055 before it comes close enough to be of interest again. (Future Pass Data)
edit on 5-10-2011 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
reply to post by kwell
 


YU55 is the only one that concerns me, based on its size.. but supposedly it will still not come within 1 LD to the Earth. But who knows?



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:26 PM
link   
reply to post by kwell
 


I did, and I did before it came close to us too.. and went by hours, but for me it shows 0.0016 AU. Is that closer than 1 lunar distance?

Edit: I also don't understand the "Condition Code" thing on the site. Does that just rank the uncertainty in the orbit? Not the same as the Torino scale? YU55 currently is a Condition Code: 0 still.
edit on 5-10-2011 by Deadscreameyes because: Added thought



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Deadscreameyes
 


[color=dodgerblue]At it's closest approach, YU55 will be 344,075.4 km away. Close in cosmic terms, but still pretty freakin' far.
edit on 5-10-2011 by daryllyn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by daryllyn
 


Haha yes, I understand what you mean.

I am kind of new to this whole JPL Small-Body Database site and tracking of NEO's, and have only been frequenting it for about two weeks.. So I am still learning. Thanks to those in the thread for correcting any mistakes I have made about any of these objects!



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Deadscreameyes
 


You can click on the condition code and it will tell you 0 is good and 9 is highly uncertain. So I guess a 7 means close to highly uncertain.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Deadscreameyes
reply to post by daryllyn
 


Haha yes, I understand what you mean.

I am kind of new to this whole JPL Small-Body Database site and tracking of NEO's, and have only been frequenting it for about two weeks.. So I am still learning. Thanks to those in the thread for correcting any mistakes I have made about any of these objects!


[color=dodgerblue]Google and a calculator (: Nothing fancy.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by kwell
reply to post by Deadscreameyes
 


You can click on the condition code and it will tell you 0 is good and 9 is highly uncertain. So I guess a 7 means close to highly uncertain.

I see, that makes a lot of sense. A few days ago in another post about NEO's, I was confused because some people were stating that the Condition Code was the same as the Torino Impact Hazard Scale.. but I thought they were totally different.

So that really does make this all quite a bit more scary! But, at least, it seems good that they say, regarding YU55, that they are completely sure of its orbit with it being at a Condition Code of 0? I wonder..



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:38 PM
link   
We need Phage!



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit.



NASA
NASA
NASA
its always about NASA for conspiracy theorists.

Even when they have to be told time and time and time and time again that NASA do not determine the orbits of rocks in space.
That task is done by the Minor Planet Center, part of the International Astronomical Union (IAU).

And for what it's worth, the actual observations (you know - actual astronomers who get out at night with telescopes) on this rock were done by
T. H. Bressi - University of Arizona's SPACEWATCH group,
K. Hills - using the Rent-A-Scope at Officer, Australia,
P. Birtwhistle - Great Shefford Observatory, West Berkshire, England.

But of course all this destroys the role of NASA in this conspiracy, so perhaps its best if you just ignore this post and continue on as you were.

edit on 5-10-2011 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
32
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join