NASA Did Not Warn Us Of The Asteroid SE58 That Almost Hit Earth. They Were Unsure Of Its Orbit., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times
Topic started on 5-10-2011 @ 10:04 PM by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:14 PM by kwell
reply to post by daryllyn



No I do not have a lot of confidence in NASA either. That is what is says that they started observing it then. I really don't trust anything they say or do.


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:16 PM by loveguy
Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)...
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer


Kinda sheds light on those recent NASA memorandums to it's employees to expect something?


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:21 PM by kwell
Originally posted by loveguy
Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit. It is listed as a code 7 so they didn't know if it was going to hit the earth. Type in September 27, 2011(notice code 7)...
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov... They also knew it would bring meteors with it but again they gave us no warning. Several meteors hit. Here is one that hit on September 26 in Argentina... www.youtube.com...

Now we know why Obama was at the Denver International Airport on September 27, 2011 near the underground bunker. NASA was also there, possibly to keep an eye on the asteroid. Denver also became the most popular destination for conferences for the big national corporations on the same day. I guess NASA really does stand for Never A Straight Answer


Kinda sheds light on those recent NASA memorandums to it's employees to expect something?


Sorry to tell you this but I think those warning were for the coming asteroid YU55 that is 1400 feet and coming very close to earth on November 9, 2011...the same day Obama is taking over the emergency broadcast system. Type in November 9, 2011... ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

Obamas takeover of the emergency broadcast system... www.fema.gov...
theintelhub.com...


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:24 PM by kwell
reply to post by Deadscreameyes



Did you look on the NASA site that I provided. It came closer to us than our moon. If they were sure of the orbit it would be a little more comforting but they were not...it was a code 7.


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:24 PM by Deadscreameyes
reply to post by kwell



YU55 is the only one that concerns me, based on its size.. but supposedly it will still not come within 1 LD to the Earth. But who knows?



reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:26 PM by Deadscreameyes
reply to post by kwell



I did, and I did before it came close to us too.. and went by hours, but for me it shows 0.0016 AU. Is that closer than 1 lunar distance?

Edit: I also don't understand the "Condition Code" thing on the site. Does that just rank the uncertainty in the orbit? Not the same as the Torino scale? YU55 currently is a Condition Code: 0 still.
edit on 5-10-2011 by Deadscreameyes because: Added thought



reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:29 PM by daryllyn
reply to post by Deadscreameyes



At it's closest approach, YU55 will be 344,075.4 km away. Close in cosmic terms, but still pretty freakin' far.
edit on 5-10-2011 by daryllyn because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:30 PM by Deadscreameyes
reply to post by daryllyn



Haha yes, I understand what you mean.

I am kind of new to this whole JPL Small-Body Database site and tracking of NEO's, and have only been frequenting it for about two weeks.. So I am still learning. Thanks to those in the thread for correcting any mistakes I have made about any of these objects!


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:32 PM by kwell
reply to post by Deadscreameyes



You can click on the condition code and it will tell you 0 is good and 9 is highly uncertain. So I guess a 7 means close to highly uncertain.


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:33 PM by daryllyn
Originally posted by Deadscreameyes
reply to
post by daryllyn



Haha yes, I understand what you mean.

I am kind of new to this whole JPL Small-Body Database site and tracking of NEO's, and have only been frequenting it for about two weeks.. So I am still learning. Thanks to those in the thread for correcting any mistakes I have made about any of these objects!


Google and a calculator (: Nothing fancy.


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:36 PM by Deadscreameyes
Originally posted by kwell
reply to
post by Deadscreameyes



You can click on the condition code and it will tell you 0 is good and 9 is highly uncertain. So I guess a 7 means close to highly uncertain.

I see, that makes a lot of sense. A few days ago in another post about NEO's, I was confused because some people were stating that the Condition Code was the same as the Torino Impact Hazard Scale.. but I thought they were totally different.

So that really does make this all quite a bit more scary! But, at least, it seems good that they say, regarding YU55, that they are completely sure of its orbit with it being at a Condition Code of 0? I wonder..


reply posted on 5-10-2011 @ 10:39 PM by alfa1
Originally posted by kwell
Why did NASA give no warning of asteroid SE58 that almost hit earth on September 27, 2011? It came very close to earth and they were uncertain of its orbit.



NASA
NASA
NASA
its always about NASA for conspiracy theorists.

Even when they have to be told time and time and time and time again that NASA do not determine the orbits of rocks in space.
That task is done by the
Minor Planet Center, part of the International Astronomical Union (IAU).

And for what it's worth, the actual observations (you know - actual astronomers who get out at night with telescopes) on this rock were done by
T. H. Bressi - University of Arizona's SPACEWATCH group,
K. Hills - using the Rent-A-Scope at Officer, Australia,
P. Birtwhistle - Great Shefford Observatory, West Berkshire, England.

But of course all this destroys the role of NASA in this conspiracy, so perhaps its best if you just ignore this post and continue on as you were.
edit on 5-10-2011 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 8 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 3 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 16 days ago with 53 member flags
The Mysterious Socotra Island (Must See!)
  Posted 1 days ago with 50 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 13 days ago with 46 member flags