It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by imAMERICAN
your right, we need to change our energy from oil to hydrogen, no more dependence on mideast and unlimited power from here
By August 1914, Britain had 247,432 regular troops. About 120,000 of these were in the British Expeditionary Army and the rest were stationed abroad.By January 1916 over 2.6 million men had volunteered for the British Army .The British Army had 1.6 million men wounded during the First World War. Approximately 662,000 were killed and another 140,000 were recorded as missing, presumed dead. hmm so most of the "british army" was killed eh? the french army however, The structure and balance of the French Army changed during the war. By 1918 about 40% of all French troops on the Western Front were artillerymen. Increasing use of machine-guns, armoured cars and tanks also reduced the numbers in the infantry. The growing importance of the French Army Air Service also had an impact and whereas there were 1,5 million in the French infantry in June 1915, this dropped to 850,000 in 1918.
Germany�s attempt to break through had exhausted its army and the initiative passed back to the Allies. On 8 August General Sir Henry Rawlinson�s 4th Army launched a major attack at Amiens against the salient created by the German offensive. Rawlinson used over 2,000 guns, 450 tanks and 1900 planes to support the attack by thirteen divisions. This time it was the German front that broke and by the end of the day 4th Army had advanced eight miles, taken 400 guns and12,000 prisoners. Amiens began the period known as the �Hundred Days�, a series of offensives along the line which drove the Germans back. Much use was made of the Australian and Canadian Corps in these attacks. On 26 September the British broke through the Hindenburg Line and on 29 September they successfully crossed the St Quentin canal. Over the next two months the British continued to drive the Germans back and when an armistice came into force on 11 November 1918, they were back at Mons. For the first time in its history the British Army had taken on and defeated the main body of the main enemy in a European war.
so what we had more men, what the fk, UR THE WON THAT STARTED THIS , im not trying to braga bout who had more men, ur trying to make a big stink about it and defending ur british honor or whatever, i madea statement and u go on , so i get the facts from a british site, dont patronize me about mine tanks and bs, i dont give a rats a hole ok? im telling u what i found and u were wrong, i dont care about who died more or what idiot general did what to whose tanks, OK? and back to the first statement, all that stuff i got from ww1 was from a BRITISH site, go check it out urself, dont hit me with paragrpahs of crap, i dont have the strength to read it, iw as jus in a hurricane which is why im replying so late, anyway.. this statement : The British Army had 1.6 million men wounded during the First World War. Approximately 662,000 were killed and another 140,000 were recorded as missing, presumed dead. was not a continuation from the last sentence, it was as of the end of the war... i believe
Free palestinians, please kiddo, they're the chechans of Israel, they're bastards.
I have a question to ask you masterp, do you think George W. Bush lied?
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Oh poor little masterp, you are a fool, please educate yourself before you sound like an idiot (oh wait, it's too late for that)
Nobody can challenge the US in terms of air, land, or sea power, it's not gonna happen anytime soon.
Free palestinians, please kiddo, they're the chechans of Israel, they're bastards.
I have a question to ask you masterp, do you think George W. Bush lied?
Originally posted by 2009
aircraft wise, true no one can come close to challenge US. even our F-15's are far too superior for most countries' air force, not to mention the new F-22. but in nuclear arsenal, alot of countries are close up behind US. i remember china developed an ICBM that can achieve earth orbit, scary stuff.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by 2009
aircraft wise, true no one can come close to challenge US. even our F-15's are far too superior for most countries' air force, not to mention the new F-22. but in nuclear arsenal, alot of countries are close up behind US. i remember china developed an ICBM that can achieve earth orbit, scary stuff.
cough russia cough.
dont get ahead of your selfs the EF will be a match for the F15.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by 2009
aircraft wise, true no one can come close to challenge US. even our F-15's are far too superior for most countries' air force, not to mention the new F-22. but in nuclear arsenal, alot of countries are close up behind US. i remember china developed an ICBM that can achieve earth orbit, scary stuff.
cough russia cough.
dont get ahead of your selfs the EF will be a match for the F15.
However, the Eagle does have better weapons and radar, so I would say they are about equal.
I am kind of shocked actually that the EF didn't employ more of a stealth design. Even if it was a first gen type equal to or around that of a F-117, that IMHO would have made it a "true" 5th gen fighter and given it a longer service life.
Originally posted by devilwasp
the tyhpoon will be upgraded and more or less be a replacement for the f-15