I believe the global warming is:
1- A reality
2- NOT man-made
3- Caused by external cosmic events (such as a change in the Sun's behavior, the Photon Belt, the disappearing of the heliosphere (it is slowly
fading away), and so on...)
4- It is a natural cycle on Earth to see the temperature go up and down ( See here )
Yes, humans are messing with our Earth, putting out pollution in the air and deforesting her. However, we must not under-estimate her power. I do NOT
believe we are changing dramatically the temperature on Earth, I believe it is all part of a bigger cycle (nothing is static, everything runs in
If global warming is caused by the augmentation of CO2 in the atmosphere like it is assumed by every supporters of the de facto theory, tell me why
the ice cores prove us without a doubt the augmentation of CO2 ALWAYS come AFTER an augmentation of temperature? In other words, why does an
augmentation of temperature cause a CO2 increase, and not the other way around?
Just look at the ice cores analysis:
Such as this one
Or this one, which is more focused on present times
Or this one
Now let's look at a research that ONLY uses peer-reviewed date: Global Warming: A Closer
Look At The Number
Using peer-reviewed researches, this research proves beyond all doubt that:
1- CO2 is responsible for 3.618% of all the greenhouse gases contribution to global warming
2- Water Vapor is responsible for exactly 95% of the same thing
3- Humans contribution to the release of CO2 is only 3.225%
4- Therefore, human contribution to global warming is 0.28% (adding all the greenhouse gases together, not just CO2)
Then we can say that, yes, humans are warming the Earth by 0,28%, assuming that the other 99,72% are constants, which we all know is utterly false!
So, to sum it up, yes, we are putting poison everywhere on Earth, destroying the bio-diversity, and so on. However, data CLEARLY shows that humans are
not fully responsible for global warming.
I think I have made my point, it's good to be back on ATS!