It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dav1d
Now KCPD certainly had the option to not comment on a possible interview, this week, instead they chose to deny that it would happen. Then when question on how long it lasted, they chose to NOT COMENT, kind of makes an unbiased observer wonder just what is going on?
Originally posted by Dav1d
The FBI has flown in a child specialist, one of the best they have (one would assume) to trip up a six and eight year old ~ and based on the lack of an arrest, this six and eight year old out smarted the specialist today. So many will continue to give LE the benefit of doubt, continue to accept that many things need to be hidden from us...
At some point, perhaps a few will start to ask, when the search for Lisa was happening in the woods, just what did LE fear we might spot from the air? Why was the airspace really closed, over the likely search areas? What secrets does LE have that they so feared someone looking over their shoulder?
Picerno would not elaborate on the questioning, except to confirm that it happened at undisclosed location. He says the family agreed to the re-interview of the boys when he took the case on November 1. Picerno says the FBI requested the delay to give it time to schedule the special forensics expert who is interviewing the half-brothers. The female questioner brought in by the FBI has more than 10 years experience and has done more than 1000 interviews, according to Picerno.
Originally posted by Michelle129th
FBI requested...apparently the red tape even in the FBI is ridiculous. It took them almost 2 weeks to get a specialist to KC when a baby is missing??? IF this is true, it makes them look worse than the parents in my eyes.
Michelle
For those that pointed their fingers at the parents, were SURE they had something to hide because they weren't rescheduling that interview...sometimes waiting for all the information to come out helps you to see all angles....
source
(Oct.31) Friday's announcement that lead attorney for Baby Lisa's family, Joe Tacopina, called police and canceled interviews of Lisa's half-brothers.
Non-Family Child Abductions
It’s a fearsome thought: a child snatched by a stranger. Who investigates these crimes? We do. It’s our job to handle cases of child abductions, often working closely with state and local law enforcement.
In 1932, Congress gave the FBI jurisdiction under the “Lindbergh Law” to immediately investigate any reported mysterious disappearance or kidnapping involving a child of “tender age”—usually 12 or younger. And just to be clear, before we get involved there does NOT have to be a ransom demand and the child does NOT have to cross state lines or be missing for 24 hours.
www.fbi.gov...
Picerno would not elaborate on the questioning, except to confirm that it happened at undisclosed location. He says the family agreed to the re-interview of the boys when he took the case on November 1.
Picerno says the FBI requested the delay to give it time to schedule the special forensics expert who is interviewing the half-brothers. The female questioner brought in by the FBI has more than 10 years experience and has done more than 1000 interviews, according to Picerno.
Police confirmed that their detectives were in a separate room and could communicate questions to the expert who interviewed the boys. The boys were interviewed separately.
fox4kc.com...
Police: No re-interviews scheduled for brothers of missing Baby Lisa Irwin
Kansas City, Mo. - Although media reports indicated Monday that a re-interview of missing 11-month-old Lisa Irwin's brothers was slated to take place this week, the Kansas City Police Dept. informed media, no such interview is scheduled to take place.
Police Capt. Steve Young relayed the new information in an email to the Missing Persons Examiner.
Continue reading on Examiner.com Police: No re-interviews scheduled for brothers of missing Baby Lisa Irwin - National Crime | Examiner.com www.examiner.com...
Originally posted by IwasOnceHappy
Originally posted by Michelle129th
FBI requested...apparently the red tape even in the FBI is ridiculous. It took them almost 2 weeks to get a specialist to KC when a baby is missing??? IF this is true, it makes them look worse than the parents in my eyes.
Michelle
This leads back to what I have been asking the last few posts. What were the FBI told by local police about the initial interviews and searches (this is a question about what they were told, not blame or fault). So what really happened the first morning this was reported and the next day. We don't know *exactly* what was said, we just know what we are being told. If the local police lead the FBI to believe the child was dead and not abducted, then could this have been why it took so long to get someone onsite? I mean, they would not be in a hurry if they thought the child was dead.
You are correct, it does not make them look good as I would think the FBI would maintain their own case of what is going on and would want to get someone on site much sooner.
IWOH
Other neighbors described an out of the ordinary morning with FBI agents knocking on their front doors.
Terry Asby-Shelton said, “My husband said they are FBI and I thought he was kidding and I thought it was some kind of inspection or something. And I said, ‘What's going on here?’ and they said it was a baby. I just about fainted
Read more: www.nbcactionnews.com...
...the U.S. Department of Justice issues the following "guidance", which most states are said to "adhere closely to" (in the U.S.)
Law enforcement must confirm that an abduction has taken place.
The child must be at risk of serious injury or death.
There must be sufficient descriptive information of child, captor, or captor's vehicle to issue an alert.
The child must be 17 years old or younger.
en.wikipedia.org...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Twelve hours - that’s how long Capt. Steve Young with the Kansas City, Missouri Police Department said an AMBER Alert can last
Read more: www.nbcactionnews.com...
How long will my Featured Pet Listing stay up?
PetAmberAlert.com will leave Featured Pet listings on our website for over 360 days or until they are found. Many other services purge records after only 120 days. Because we know the survival instincts of your pet and the bond you have with them, we don’t give up so easily. However, please remember it is important to notify us if your pet is found so valuable space and time is not wasted which could be used for pets who are still missing.
www.petamberalert.com...
An initial Amber Alert can go out for three to five days, depending on the circumstances. It can also be renewed by law enforcement agencies if they think it is necessary. ChaCha
www.chacha.com...
We have a special forensics expert going up against a six and an eight year old, and judging by the lack of an arrest unable to break a six or an eight year old..
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
We have a special forensics expert going up against a six and an eight year old, and judging by the lack of an arrest unable to break a six or an eight year old..
Huh? 'Unable to 'break' a six/eight year old?
What are you going on about now?
'Judging by the lack of an arrest?' They haven't even interviewed them yet?
*Walks out shaking my head*... And you think I'm the one who's biased? Wow...
peace
They have interviewed the boys...at 4:30 pm yesterday. I don't know what happened or what was said in that interview but I think David's point was that if it were anything of consequence the parents would be in custody right now.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Michelle129th
They have interviewed the boys...at 4:30 pm yesterday. I don't know what happened or what was said in that interview but I think David's point was that if it were anything of consequence the parents would be in custody right now.
'Interview' was the wrong word - when not preceded by 'processed' - meaning, I can't imagine those boys being interviewed late in the evening and an arrest taking place before nightfall. For many reasons that should be blatantly obvious.
My point? 'Breaking' a 6/8 year old is out of line. The police have repeatedly stated they'll take great care interviewing those children.
To use a sensationalistic phrase such as 'break them' in conjunction with two children - also implying the police are unable to adequately interview children? That's absurd.
My gawd, if someone used the phrase 'break children' applying it to the parents? You people'd be birthing kittens.
peaceedit on 11-11-2011 by silo13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by silo13
Well right let's remember they've been attempting to re interview these boys for 3 or more weeks at this point. SO the lack of arrest and the boy's itnerviews are not related because they've wanted to talk to boys all this time. ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by schmae
Or maybe they are hoping that the boys have heard something SINCE then in the home that might give them some idea. Poor boys. I feel so bad for them. I hope they are as content and still in this tornado as possible. I hope they get to play with their friends and just climb a tree and be boys !
Originally posted by Dav1d
Non-Family Child Abductions
It’s a fearsome thought: a child snatched by a stranger. Who investigates these crimes? We do. It’s our job to handle cases of child abductions, often working closely with state and local law enforcement.
In 1932, Congress gave the FBI jurisdiction under the “Lindbergh Law” to immediately investigate any reported mysterious disappearance or kidnapping involving a child of “tender age”—usually 12 or younger. And just to be clear, before we get involved there does NOT have to be a ransom demand and the child does NOT have to cross state lines or be missing for 24 hours.
www.fbi.gov...
So Lisa is under 12
It is alledged that she was abducted by a non family member.
It's pretty clear that the FBI has jurisdiction here. Google on FBI and CARD for more.
So Picerno states that the boys will be interview this week. Then Capt. Steve Young states that there is no interview schelude this week, in direct response to the statement that there is an interview scheluded for this week. Only one of these statements can be true, and less than 48 hours later we know who spoke the truth, and who didn't.
It is pretty clear what Capt. Steve Young is. One has to wonder, at just why the KCPD wants to sully the families reputation.
We have a special forensics expert going up against a six and an eight year old, and judging by the lack of an arrest unable to break a six or an eight year old.... One would assume that the special forensics expert with more than ten years of experience, would be one of the FBI better experts... Actions often speak louder than words, and we are at five weeks, with no arrest....
We are at five weeks of giving LE the benefit of doubt...
Just whom is suppose to be held to a higher standard here?
Just whom is suppose to be innocent until PROVEN guilty here?
Is it really LE that is suppose to be given the benefit of doubt, time and time again?