It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thurisaz
reply to post by Michelle129th
My Daughter recently had a sample taken. It was quick using a swab, there were no court order in place, it was part of the police investigation.
Why would the police need a court order to take DNA samples? The Parents don't appear to be cooperating unless of course court orders are routine in the USA?
over here, if for eg, my Daughter refused to allow the swab, then the police would approach the courts for an order to proceed.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by wildtimes
Kansas City is especially keen on Community Policing. We are encouraged to speculate, to call the police if we see anything suspicious.
That still just gets my goat. It's unbelievable to me someone - especially a couple - in their own homes - who'd witness a man carrying a baby down the road in the wee hours of the morning, the baby is inappropriately dressed - and they don't call the police.
That still just sticks in my craw.
peace
Originally posted by Thurisaz
reply to post by Michelle129th
My Daughter recently had a sample taken. It was quick using a swab, there were no court order in place, it was part of the police investigation.
Why would the police need a court order to take DNA samples? The Parents don't appear to be cooperating unless of course court orders are routine in the USA?
over here, if for eg, my Daughter refused to allow the swab, then the police would approach the courts for an order to proceed.
Originally posted by Dav1d
The police took DNA samples on day one, on day one they knew that they would want DNA samples. Go back to the week of the fourth and look at what the police was looking at, in the sewer, cistern, the police by their behavior are convinced this child is dead.
I know that I read that the police got DNA samples on day one, when the police volunteer that the family was cooperating. Now at week four they want more samples? Is this because they lost the originals? DNA doesn't change week to week. Is it because the police over looked the need for DNA samples from the family until almost a month into the invisgation? Would this be a sign of police competence, or incompetence? Or is it a sign of covering your ass, and having available the ability to plant evidence in the future? The police are suppose to be the experts, and if they act as if your daughter is dead from day one. If they accuse you of your daughters death from day one. If they tell you your daughter is dead for almost a month, should we really be surprised if from time to time you also refer to her as being dead?
"...false confessions usually involve coercive interrogations in which police claim to have evidence of a suspect's guilt and then promise leniency for cooperation or severe punishment for non-cooperation.
I'm curious as well as to what her lawyer is advising her to do or say,If they are not involved in Lisa disappearance why is she not advising them to do interviews?
why all the silence?Lets see,no interviews from the police or media,their not actively out looking,what exactly are they doing to find their child?Nothing,nada,zip,zero and that's what I don't get.As a mom I would be moving heaven and earth to find my child,I would have to be physically sedated....so to behave the way they are I don't understand,could it be perfectly normal for some?I guess,...but not in my world.
Yes, everytime we see a man carrying a baby, and the baby isn't dressed as we would dress the baby, we should call the cops...
Rasleen Raim is the mother of the 8-year-old that was living in the North Lister home. Raim and Jeremy Irwin, Lisa’s father, once lived together in the same Northland home. But in 2008, the couple’s custody battle played out in court and Jeremy Irwin received full custody of their child.
Raim said she has not been able to see her son for years.
Ryan asked, “What did you think when you heard about the baby?”
“I thought about my boy, I thought it was mine,” Raim said.
“How much do you miss him?”
“I can't even say…I miss him a lot.”
We spoke to Raim on the phone Wednesday night and she said she was worried about her son.
Circumstances: Both photos shown are of Lisa. She was last seen at home on October 4, 2011 at approximately 4:00 a.m. Lisa has a birthmark on her right thigh. She was last known to be wearing purple pants and a purple shirt with kittens on it.
Let's see the police miss stated the time Lisa was last seen! This would have the effect of narrowing the area where she could be!! The alert was issued at 7:00 am and based on the alert info she was last seen at 4:00 am based on that info at that time she would be within a 3:00 hour window of KC... Rather than the 8+ hour window she could actually be in. This would have significantly lessen the search arrea!!!
When did you last see Lisa?
■Gave Lisa a bath, put sleeping clothes on her, put her to sleep at 10:30 p.m. as Deborah was going to bed herself. Was programming new numbers in a new phone to replace a third broken one.
■Put Lisa to bed at 7 to 7:30 pm, checked on Lisa at 10:30 pm as she was going to bed.
■Version 4.0.1: Put Lisa to bed at 6:40 pm, checked on her once shortly after, either was well on her way to getting drunk or started getting drunk (she calls it “her adult time” ) has no clue if she ever checked on Lisa again,
and the info there is still wrong!
We may never know what effect this had on baby Lisa, in the first critical 48 hours of her case....
We may never know the full effects of the choice to cancel the alart by 7:00 pm that night.