It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I heard only one news item from Megan Kelly on Fox saying that the only trouble with the law either of the parents had been in before was a DWI on Jeremy, not Deborah. I've seen mention of Deborah losing her license due to a DWI. Is there a source for that? Or did the initial report of Jeremuy's dwi get transferred to her? A lot of people, strangely enough , do not drive. They just never got a license and so that may be why Deborah does not drive. She has an anxiety disorder, which are often accompanied by OCDs of some kind and she may just be too nervous to drive and so never got a license.
Do we know if his ex cheated on him? Is it possible that SHE -- his ex and presumably the mother of his son -- was unhappy about his relationship with Deborah? If she knew where he and the boy lived, and she was incensed about it (and, considering she's living in a "group home", there must be some backstory there as to her own judgment), is it feasible to think maybe she wanted the baby for her own??
NO WAY could i make viable statements or think viable thoughts about something so important in my state.
Interesting then VisitKC is lying when it claims;
LOL I don't always agree with you Gabby2011, but I do like that you in my opinion are not into character assassination. However, I'm curious if you feel a married woman, living with a man other than her husband, and having a baby with him; and a husband that would divorce his wife, who needs to live in a group home. Says anything that is relevant to this matter ~ or is it all just a diversion?
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
Interesting then VisitKC is lying when it claims;
What do you expect a tourist information center to say? LOL. 'Nope, we don't got no taxis here.'
Sorry, but, I looked up a tourist bulletin for my area and got a good laugh for the day. Especially when they stated anything that could be found in an American pharmacy could be found here. IF ONLY!
I'll take first hand knowledge to anything put out by a 'come visit us and give us your money' site anytime. If Schmae says there's limited Taxis - I'd make sure and rent a car.
peace
Kansas City is especially keen on Community Policing. We are encouraged to speculate, to call the police if we see anything suspicious.
"Good Morning America's" Dan Abrams said the boys were in the house when the baby disappeared, and they are relevant witnesses.
The half-brothers of a missing Missouri girl, who were in the family's home the night the 11-month-old disappeared, will be re-interviewed by authorities on Friday, Kansas City police said Wednesday.
Lisa Irwin's brothers, who reportedly are ages 8 and 5, will be interviewed by a "child services specialist trained to interview kids," Kansas City police Capt. Steve Young said. The interview will be non-confrontational, he said, and a police officer won't even be in the room.
"Not an interrogation," he said. "They are kids, after all."
here
Attorney Cyndy Short told ABC News that police will talk to the boys on Friday, and that DNA samples will also be taken from them.
Originally posted by silo13
Half-brothers of missing Missouri girl to be interviewed
I take that back, lol. Here is is:
here
Attorney Cyndy Short told ABC News that police will talk to the boys on Friday, and that DNA samples will also be taken from them.
peaceedit on 26-10-2011 by silo13 because: link add
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
Interesting then VisitKC is lying when it claims;
What do you expect a tourist information center to say? LOL. 'Nope, we don't got no taxis here.'
Sorry, but, I looked up a tourist bulletin for my area and got a good laugh for the day. Especially when they stated anything that could be found in an American pharmacy could be found here. IF ONLY!
I'll take first hand knowledge to anything put out by a 'come visit us and give us your money' site anytime. If WildTimes tells us there's limited Taxis service? I'd make sure and rent a car.
It does bring up another issue also. If Jeremy is at work, and Deborah can't drive, there's no taxi service? What's she going to do if something happens to one of those kids? Rely on 911? Or wait until later? Lisa was sick at the time - a baby at that age can take a turn for the worse so easily! I guess I'll just have to write it down as her feeling confident to call 911.
That is until we remember none of her phones worked.
So now we've got a mother who's inebriated, can't drive and no phone to call 911 (so says she) if something happens to the kids while the father is at work.
peaceedit on 26-10-2011 by silo13 because: fix name
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
Interesting then VisitKC is lying when it claims;
What do you expect a tourist information center to say? LOL. 'Nope, we don't got no taxis here.'
Sorry, but, I looked up a tourist bulletin for my area and got a good laugh for the day. Especially when they stated anything that could be found in an American pharmacy could be found here. IF ONLY!
I'll take first hand knowledge to anything put out by a 'come visit us and give us your money' site anytime. If WildTimes tells us there's limited Taxis service? I'd make sure and rent a car.
It does bring up another issue also. If Jeremy is at work, and Deborah can't drive, there's no taxi service? What's she going to do if something happens to one of those kids? Rely on 911? Or wait until later? Lisa was sick at the time - a baby at that age can take a turn for the worse so easily! I guess I'll just have to write it down as her feeling confident to call 911.
Why wouldn't the police have DNA samples from the family? GOD only knows how many DNA samples are in a persons house.
Originally posted by gabby2011
reply to post by Dav1d
LOL I don't always agree with you Gabby2011, but I do like that you in my opinion are not into character assassination. However, I'm curious if you feel a married woman, living with a man other than her husband, and having a baby with him; and a husband that would divorce his wife, who needs to live in a group home. Says anything that is relevant to this matter ~ or is it all just a diversion?
It says to me that they have had a some family problems ..and many many families today are from "blended" families. It could mean that there are some family members who have grudges, or ulterior motives for taking the baby.
I apologize if I saw wildtimes info as more character assassination, if it was only an attempt to shine some info on the possibilities of others being involved.
Just because a married woman gets pregnant by another man.. after not seeing her husband for quite some time..( a few years?)..does not make her morally corrupt in my eyes...though it may to others.
And now she is allegedly home without the ability to call?!? Funny I thought at one point it had been stated here, that Jermey left his phone at home, that the only working phone was their landline?
Originally posted by judydawg
reply to post by silo13
Why wouldn't the police have DNA samples from the family? GOD only knows how many DNA samples are in a persons house. Police aren't telling us everything, which is a good thing. They have had complete access to that home!?! This is driving me crazy and breaks my heart. Toothbrush? Hairbrush? Toys?
abcnews.go.com...
"We are expecting to collect DNA samples," Snapp said. "It will be very non-intrusive, pretty much just a Q-tip swab." Snapp said some DNA samples, currently in a lab, that were collected from the house are labeled "unknown" and they want to use the boys' DNA to eliminate some of the unknown samples.
The justification for the last search warrant was to collect DNA samples!
It is one thing for the police not to share all they know, it moves the police into a different light when they choose to lie, to choose to give false impressions, and choose to publicly vilify a person!
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
The justification for the last search warrant was to collect DNA samples!
Sure is, but, without then taking DNA from the family members how do you know who is whos? How do you differentiate one from the other???
In other words they've got dna from a brush and toothbrush and comb, etc, but until they then take dna []uspecifically from each person how can they match comb to person, toothbrush to what family member, etc?
Added note:
It is one thing for the police not to share all they know, it moves the police into a different light when they choose to lie, to choose to give false impressions, and choose to publicly vilify a person!
Ridding so close on the C. Anthony case I'd bet the police are being very careful who they're trying to 'vilify' if anyone at all.
peaceedit on 26-10-2011 by silo13 because: see added note above
It is one thing for the police not to share all they know, it moves the police into a different light when they choose to lie, to choose to give false impressions, and choose to publicly vilify a person!