It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schmae
Here is my working theory on what happened that day. I've been reading a lot as we all have and I don't know what my theory may have been before but here is what I think is close to what happened.
Dad goes to work that night....
Another option is that Deb has already removed and done something with Lisa and he wants to believe her so badly becaus the alternative is jsut too horrible to think of and again the KEEPING HIS SON thought must be very close to his heart at all times. He wants to believe her an believe it was an accident but the police wi9ll never believe it so why even go there ?
Thoughts?
Over the weekend police investigated two new leads that came forward from the case. A teenage neighbor who was at the Irwin's home the day Lisa vanished and who also knew the code to the garage door was questioned. Nothing concrete has emerged and Police are looking for new tips.
(my bold)
Crime scene personnel recovered items from the home, but due to the initial information provided by the family, the only areas extensively processed for DNA and fingerprints during the consent were the baby’s bedroom and possible points of entry.
Originally posted by silo13
I checked back through the PDF warrant information for any mention of the basement and it is there. The basement was searched and revealed nothing - so that’s cleared up once and for all. End of that discussion.
Now on to a new one though that’s got me stumped.
While going through the info in search of the above I found this and it was red flags waving off the page.
(my bold)
Crime scene personnel recovered items from the home, but due to the initial information provided by the family, the only areas extensively processed for DNA and fingerprints during the consent were the baby’s bedroom and possible points of entry.
During the ‘consent’??? So, in other words during the first search the parents gave ‘consent’ to where the police could search and that did NOT include Deborah’s bedroom where the cadaver dogs ‘hit’ on an area around her bed near the floor?
Wow.edit on 24-10-2011 by silo13 because: my bold
Originally posted by whyamIhere
Watch THIS Video...
Tacopina tears evidence apart
He makes a great point...
There would be no decomposition in hours.
Baby Lisa is out there...She might be alive.
Attorney Joe Tacopina, a top criminal attorney hired by the parents of missing Kansas City baby Lisa Irwin on Monday, told the Today Show Tuesday there’s “absolutely not” a chance the baby’s mother Deborah will be arrested in connection with the 10-month-old’s October 4 disappearance.
Originally posted by Dav1d
Actually that is incorrect! I am surprised that he is not better informed than this, decomposition starts at death, and at least one study shows that cadaver dogs can detect decomposition on carpet after 2 minutes exposure to a body 2 hours old!edit on 24-10-2011 by Dav1d because: Additional info
Attorney Joe Tacopina, a top criminal attorney hired by the parents of missing Kansas City baby Lisa Irwin on Monday, told the Today Show Tuesday there’s “absolutely not” a chance the baby’s mother Deborah will be arrested in connection with the 10-month-old’s October 4 disappearance.edit on 24-10-2011 by Dav1d because: (no reason given)