It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Good questions, and yet you suggest that we should simply blindly accept these results, and if we don't you imply it's because of a desire to train our own dogs.
Can we add two and two?
UK murder mystery and police corruption
Your continued attempt to blanket lump all law enforcement into one groups is a fialure. Your attempts to discredit law enforcement as a whole by cherry picking incidents that occured in other states is a failure.
You both have done nothing but complain and accuse law enforcement from the begining. Neither of you understand what you type because when you get called out on it, you change your story, as you have just done....again).
The body will be located - The parents will be charged - You and Dave will be wrong - and you and dave will then scream coverup and conspiracy because in your minds, as well as posts, its evident thats all you guys are intrested in anyways - blaming / attacking the police.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
I keep clicking this thread for updates and news, but am tired of the bickering posts that are not contributing anything new. What a shame, in a case like this a continuous updated thread is wonderful, but I would have to say almost half the posts in this thread are bickering and in fighting, who has time to wade through it all? It is getting too hard to find the real nuggets of updates now. I bet I am not the only lurker to this thread who feels this way. I wish the fighting would stop. There is a missing child out there, and it is looking like something sinister happened to her.
Originally posted by vogon42
reply to post by Dav1d
Anderson was profiled on the television show "Unsolved Mysteries"
Do you happen to have a link, or any info on this ONE TV show you are basing all of your information on?
If either of the parents are found guilty, it would be reasonable to me that they be charged for all the expense the county has gone through in locating their daughter...as well as the crime. BUT...until that proof comes through, beyond a reasonable doubt.. I refuse to take part in the assassination of her character. Here's hoping baby Lisa will be found, and the REAL truth will be revealed.
Like you..I hope the truth eventually comes out.. ALL of it.. and justice is served...but until all the facts are made known, I will not jump to conclusions about where the child is now... or what happened to her.
I never ever said she WAS innocent.. but I do think if the baby died while in her care..it was NOT murder..and the result of an accident due to improper supervision. I think she could be innocent.. and until all the facts are presented.. I won't decide.
Originally posted by schmae
I'm thinking about the uncle's fb posts. Let's PRETEND he's truthful. ( pretend because we have no way to know and he seems LESS than credible at this moment) He's saying she called a lot of family that night for help and they all declined. I've thought from the beginning the police acted as though they KNEW what happened to Lisa from very early on . So let's PRETEND this scenario happened : Accident happens, Deb calls family and gets hung up on basically. WHen morning comes and family sees that Lisa is indeed missing. These few to several family members call LE immediately. They report Deb' phone call from night before. Cops hear this info immediately and it's validated immediately. HOW? CELL PHONE RECORDS..... We only heard about ONE call from Deb's phone to MW's phone. Maybe this is NOT the only call. Maybe this is the only call that LE did n't KNOW the phone it went to. Maybe they got Deb's cell records the next day or two and saw a flurry of calls at 10:45 to 5 of Deb's relatives in quick succession. The same 5 relativese who called LE the day before to report the calls with t he times. It is a smoking gun? No, but it is clear 5 relatives are telling the same story backed up by phone records and Deb's denying them. Could be? Someone I'm sure is about to show me the err of my l ogic and that's ok Because we are discussing and I started with LETS PRETEND .
It just struck me the other day after reading uncle johnnys' FB page that we only KNOW of one call made from Deb's phone. That does not mean it's t he ONLY call made. It only means its the call we were told about. ( or Jeremys' phone or whoever owns the phone in question)
Also I've seen more than one place that Jeremy actually did call home to tell her he would be MUCH later than he thought. Does anyone know what phone he used and what phone recieved that call? It seems to shoot holes in their own theory of phones were restricted. Is it time to throw the restricted phone story out ?
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by gabby2011
That's why """"PRETEND this scenario happened : Accident happens, Deb calls family and gets hung up on basically. WHen morning comes and family sees that Lisa is indeed missing. These few to several family members call LE immediately. They report Deb' phone call from night before. Cops hear this info immediately and it's validated immediately'''''''
Maybe they thought she was drunk or full of it UNTIL they saw the news....... OR I guess for all we know some calls may have gone into 911 that night from her family. Who knows?