It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's the problem, I would never consider such odds.
Originally posted by spikey
If you considered the odds in your favour of being right were around 1000 Billion Billion to one...wouldn't you talk in a similar way too mate?
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by ArMaP
The so called faces on Mars don't really interest me as they could be as you say products of bad photos and good imaginations , but the glassy tubes , tree like structures and standing stone structures have always stood out as anomalous to me .
I have seen the explanations for the glassy tubes and remain unconvinced , though I guess the possibility that they are just a product of imaging remains a plausible , but not only explanation .
edit on 5-10-2011 by gortex because: grammar edit
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by HawkeyeNation
That's true, the hardest part (apparently) is the start of a life form, because after that, they find a way of adapting to the change in their environment and can keep on living in conditions in which they weren't able to start living.
The existence of some large, with no visible bottom, holes in the ground makes me think that's possible that Mars has some large underground spaces, where the temperatures are more constant and mild and where it's possible to have a local atmosphere, slightly different from the outside atmosphere, and a place like that would excellent to keep some adaptable life forms living for a long time.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I don't think it is wrong to conclude that life MAY exist on Mars because the conditions to support life are there. I think it's likely absurd to conclude that we are the only life in the universe.
I do think that people who are or claim to be scientists should be more careful in how they present things in the videos.
I've also come to believe we place to much significance on titles. Too often so called PhD's end up having fake PhD's from one of those fake institutions, not to mention even scientists can be mistaken, delusional or just plain wrong.
That's why I remain a proud skeptic, even though I was a witness myself and saw a classic saucer in the 1960's up close directly above me for a few minutes. I'd be a liar if I called it Alien as it could well have been military in nature and without lying I cannot say what it was.
Well, in that case I have to ask, how do you know it?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Although there is a very good chance that MARS may have been home to some forms of life eons ago....and may even still have some form of Microbial life in sub-surface water saturated areas...your are INCORRECT in your statement that underground spaces would have anything that could be considered a MILD TEMP.
I know that, I wasn't thinking about temperatures being higher as you go deeper, like happens on Earth, I was thinking that, underground, there isn't as much loss of heat as at the surface, because the atmosphere loses heat much faster than the ground, so underground the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures is smaller, and they are closer to the ground temperature at the surface, when heated by the Sun (temperatures on a surface exposed to the Sun are always higher than the air temperature above that surface).
Unlike Earth...Mars is no longer geologically active and since it no longer generates any real enviromentaly protective magnetic field...thus the surface of Mars is bombarded mercilesly with solar and cosmic radiation...not only is the surface sterile...but there is no heat generation from a now dead planetary core.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Well, in that case I have to ask, how do you know it?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Although there is a very good chance that MARS may have been home to some forms of life eons ago....and may even still have some form of Microbial life in sub-surface water saturated areas...your are INCORRECT in your statement that underground spaces would have anything that could be considered a MILD TEMP.
I know that, I wasn't thinking about temperatures being higher as you go deeper, like happens on Earth, I was thinking that, underground, there isn't as much loss of heat as at the surface, because the atmosphere loses heat much faster than the ground, so underground the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures is smaller, and they are closer to the ground temperature at the surface, when heated by the Sun (temperatures on a surface exposed to the Sun are always higher than the air temperature above that surface).
Unlike Earth...Mars is no longer geologically active and since it no longer generates any real enviromentaly protective magnetic field...thus the surface of Mars is bombarded mercilesly with solar and cosmic radiation...not only is the surface sterile...but there is no heat generation from a now dead planetary core.
As the maximum temperatures on Mars are not that low (I think the maximum is 20º C), I think the underground temperature can be (probably) mild when compared with the surface temperature.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
That's why I remain a proud skeptic, even though I was a witness myself and saw a classic saucer in the 1960's up close directly above me for a few minutes. I'd be a liar if I called it Alien as it could well have been military in nature and without lying I cannot say what it was.
Any underground area, if connected to the surface, will hold any atmosphere, at least the same as on the surface, but, if deep enough, slightly denser.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
My reply is directed at your statement of underground areas that are of lagre enough volume to hold any atmosphere.
The funny thing is that I see it from the opposite point of view: any planet that gets enough solar radiation will not cool below the temperature the Sun provides.
Any deeper than this...lets say...10 meters down...in an underground cavern...even with ice...the temperature would be cold in the extreme. A Billion years of geologic inactivity would mean that this cavern would become colder and colder over time. Too Cold.
Originally posted by ArMaP
The "glass tubes" are probably just dunes, as seen in other places, even on Earth, and the tree like structures have no third dimension, they are flat features, as we can see on all new, higher resolution photos.
Originally posted by gortex
The so called faces on Mars don't really interest me as they could be as you say products of bad photos and good imaginations , but the glassy tubes , tree like structures and standing stone structures have always stood out as anomalous to me .