It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Very large eruption on the Sun, Oct 04 13:00

page: 7
79
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 12:07 PM
link   
reply to post by NewsWorthy
 


Comets are made of water ice. Water ice does not "hit" the sun. It vaporizes before it even reaches Venus.




posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 12:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by NewsWorthy
 


Comets are made of water ice. Water ice does not "hit" the sun. It vaporizes before it even reaches Venus.


Maybe you find here some interesting things ..

Here you can see reaction of comets and Sun ..

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Not all comets made of "water" like nothing in nature is 100% ..

I find some min. 25 % they make CME when passing or impact the Sun ..

And that what scientists say is only suggestion like mine or yours, they don't have enough research and knowledge for comets ..

Think they change that statement for comets very so0n in future ..

Peace ..

edit on 5-10-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 12:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Dalke07
 


comets are water ice. Whatever else they are made of is irrelevant. Because in any gravity-free formed item, things are usually distributed pretty evenly. IE, once the water is gone, the comet is too.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   
Observations of a Comet on Collision Course with the Sun

February, 1982

D. J. MICHELS, N. R. SHEELEY, JR., R. A. HOWARD and M. J. KOOMEN
+ Author Affiliations

E. O. Hulburt Center for Space Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375
ABSTRACT

"A brilliant new comet (1979 XI: Howard-Koomen-Michels) was discovered in data from the Naval Research Laboratory's orbiting SOLWIND coronagraph. An extensive sequence of pictures, telemetered from the P78-1 satellite, shows the coma, accompanied by a bright and well-developed tail, passing through the coronagraph's field of view at afew million kilometers from the sun. Preliminary orbital calculations based on the observed motion of the comet's head and morphology of the tail indicate that this previously unreported object is a sungrazing comet and may be one of the group of Kreutz sungrazers. It appears from the data that the perihelion distance was less than 1 solar radius, so that the cometary nucleus encountered dense regions of the sun's atmosphere, was completely vaporized, and did not reappear after the time of closest approach to the sun.

After this time, however, cometary debris, scattered into the ambient solar wind, caused a brightening of the corona over one solar hemisphere and to heliocentric distances of 5 to 10 solar radii."

www.sciencemag.org...



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 01:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dalke07



edit on 5-10-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)


Dont mean to harp on about this, but what is this image? Is that a crater?

And why is there so little information on CMEs and whatever is going on with the sun right now? Everybody is like "Whoa" and no real explanations have come out. Everthing is just vague.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
"Further support for the predictive power of the Electric Universe model comes from NASA’s Stardust mission to comet Wild 2 and the discovery that the comet is made of “rocky material, like an asteroid.”

www.holoscience.com...



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 02:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Deetermined
 


I knew that .I think the debunker's need to realize this .Not all comet's are made of just ice and dust .Seriously.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Monkeygod333

Originally posted by Dalke07



edit on 5-10-2011 by Dalke07 because: (no reason given)


Dont mean to harp on about this, but what is this image? Is that a crater?

And why is there so little information on CMEs and whatever is going on with the sun right now? Everybody is like "Whoa" and no real explanations have come out. Everthing is just vague.


Not sure if it is a crater, but doesn't it look like there is a face looking back at you in the image dalke posted of the sun. Just in time for halloween coming up too

edit on 5-10-2011 by xxnibiruxx because: image



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Dalke07
 


comets are water ice. Whatever else they are made of is irrelevant. Because in any gravity-free formed item, things are usually distributed pretty evenly. IE, once the water is gone, the comet is too.


I remember reading on here that comets are made of frozen gasses mainly not water.
I'm looking now for it.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 02:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by veritaslibertas
 


Hypothetically?

No chance.

Elenin is no more.


Chadwickus, you may need to start a new thread called," Elenin
is no more." Use the usual JPL orbits, and Spaceweather.com facts.
But some people still won't let go.
This CME is a nice catch.
In 2 weeks, we'll know what happened.
In 9 weeks, it'll be Christmas.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by xxnibiruxx
 


That's a pic of the sun seen with SDO satellite, wavelength of 1600A(angstrom).
The sun has no real craters it's a ball of plasma.
The lighter spots are active regions(regions where the magnetic field is stronger than on other places on the corona)
They can contain sunspots(the darker regions you see).



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by deadeyedick
 


probably. But it's definable water.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 04:09 PM
link   
Here's an updated image zoomed on the sun's activity:





The magnetogram....



Seems to be stable for now, keeping my eyes out nonetheless

edit on 5-10-2011 by xxnibiruxx because: links



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   
By the way, I was wondering what the smaller looking object down and to the left, and close to center is
Seems rather interesting, but it couldn't be Venus could it ?




edit on 5-10-2011 by xxnibiruxx because: grammar



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 07:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Monkeygod333
 


Just to be clear, are you referring to the white spot on the lower-mid left edge in this image or somewhere else?


edit on 5-10-2011 by Psychogeist because: (specificity)

edit on 5-10-2011 by Psychogeist because: (more 'specificity')



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 07:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxnibiruxx
Here's an updated image zoomed on the sun's activity:





The magnetogram....



Seems to be stable for now, keeping my eyes out nonetheless

edit on 5-10-2011 by xxnibiruxx because: links


The pic you show is stereo EUVI 195Angstrom. It shows the coronal layers of the sun at about 1.5 million K temperature.
This link shows the Magnetogram www.solarmonitor.org...

edit: Not stereo but soho195
edit on 5-10-2011 by intergalactic fire because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by 1322hawk
 


If we get a "bigun" widespread power outages and electrical disruption are a possibility. Beyond that, you would have to ask someone more experienced in Flares/CMEs.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:36 PM
link   
I don't have to worry, because the planet will take care of itself



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 11:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreedomCommander
I don't have to worry, because the planet will take care of itself



We are meaningless in the existence of the universe. The probability that the earth has "backup systems" and "defensive maneuvers" is very unlikely.

Unless you want to argue that some alien power is keeping us alive, in which case even they may not have the power to stop what's happening(or else they would have).



posted on Oct, 6 2011 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by demonseed
We are meaningless in the existence of the universe. The probability that the earth has "backup systems" and "defensive maneuvers" is very unlikely.

That kind of assumes the existence of the universe has some meaning. If the existence of the universe has no meaning, it is pointless to ask if our existence within this universe has a meaning or state that it has no meaning. If the existence of the universe itself has some meaning, there is no reson why the existence of any part of it, including ourselves, the plants, the animals bacteria viruses and others, should not have some meaning.

Unless you want to argue that some alien power is keeping us alive, in which case even they may not have the power to stop what's happening(or else they would have).

Who knows who they, if they exist, are keeping alive and for what purpose.



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join