It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sun recorded with an IR Camera yesterday October 3, 2011 take a look at this

page: 2
23
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:49 AM
link   
Not a lens flare?





OMG it changes shape!

Lens flare.


edit on 4/10/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:50 AM
link   
I have seen this situation before.

This thread is about to get 80 pages long, full of people speculating whether or not these are friendly aliens.

The answer is on page 1.

Funny stuff!



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


NO! it's not a lens flare.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:50 AM
link   
reply to post by TinkerHaus
 


Its just VENUS*

edit on 10/4/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
reply to post by flexy123
 


Yes, you CAN see Mercury with a camera and filters. Without magnification.

I'm not 100% certain it's Mercury, but it doesn't move in relation to the camera movement like you would expect a lens flare to do.

I could be wrong about this particular object, but you can definitely see Mercury in broad daylight with simple equipment.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


i cant see any change in shape


i go for mercury...stellarium OP?



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Human4life
 


YES! It's lens flare.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
reply to post by cdesigns
 


As the camera is pointing at the sun, spin the camera, but keep it pointed at the sun.

if the dot doesnt move, it would be a lot more convincing that it is not a lens flare.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 08:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by SatoriTheory
reply to post by cdesigns
 


It looks like an internal lens reflection. As you move the camera about the 'thing' changes size/shape and almost vanishes at one point, which should tell you it's not a physical object. But then you probably knew that already.

st.


This. It's not lens flare, which moves around with the camera, but it is an internal reflection. There are dozens of these type of videos around that show this.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by flexy123
reply to post by TinkerHaus
 


It's very obviously a lens-flare, you can see that already in the first second of the video.

And you cannot see mercury with the unaided eye or simply pointing a camera at the sun.


He is not seeing it unaided though. He is seeing it with an IR filter. And it's not obviously lens flare as it doesn't move when the camera does.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 


CHAD provided the proof which was there right infront of your eyes and in the same video and with a snap shot from it , you can clearly see it moving at times , objects that are physical in space do not move when you change the direction of the camera and also do not vanish at times , so that means it was a lens flare .

peace



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:17 AM
link   
reply to post by cdesigns
 


I hope you find the filter!

To rule out lens flare, slide a piece of construction paper across the lens from the right side until the sun is blocked out and see if the other object remains.

The "Dark Star" (if it exists) would likely not put out much visible light, so it would be a huge find if someone got an IR picture of it and could prove it wasn't lens (or internal) flare.
edit on 4-10-2011 by getreadyalready because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:29 AM
link   
reply to post by getreadyalready
 


The only thing that would make me worry is if we had a report of an asteroid coming from the direction of the sun soon..

YU55
"Since the asteroid will approach the Earth from the sunward direction, it will be a daylight object until the time of closest approach. The best time for new ground-based optical and infrared observations will be late in the day on November 8, after 21:00 hours UT from the eastern Atlantic and western Africa zone. A few hours after its close Earth approach, it will become generally accessible for optical and near-IR observations but will provide a challenging target because of its rapid motion across the sky."

neo.jpl.nasa.gov...

Epic... DOH!!



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:33 AM
link   
A lot of people are gonna go blind after reading this thread.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by cdesigns
 


I hope you find the filter!

To rule out lens flare, slide a piece of construction paper across the lens from the right side until the sun is blocked out and see if the other object remains.

The "Dark Star" (if it exists) would likely not put out much visible light, so it would be a huge find if someone got an IR picture of it and could prove it wasn't lens flare.


I personally believe NASA is totally compromised and would never tell us of any large objects that may be a threat to us, and I use make shift IR filters and my camera looking at the sun about once or twice a week.
I have yet to find any real anomalies near the sun, I find more invisible UFO's more than anything else.

If I ever find anything near the moon or sun with my IR filters, this will be the 1st place I'll post it, besides Youtube.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:37 AM
link   
reply to post by JibbyJedi
 


Let's see some of your invisible UFOs please. It's not important that they have to be near the sun.



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by wigit
 


I don't have anything decent recorded, my TR-3B photos are on a broken drive too.
This is how I do it though...



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 09:56 AM
link   
I think it best that all the planet/comet/second sun people run to the hills, set up their survival gear. When this lens flare/or camera artifact hits earth, we will all get the truth, separation, understanding we need.

haha.
I love how it has come down to, " It is NOT a lens flare it is a SECOND SUN, DWARF STAR, NIBIRU, ElENIN. YOU SHEEPLE ARE SO CLOSE MINDED" Well, I guess if I close my mind to all the OTHER explanations of what it could be, I must be a sheeple.
LOL.

When I go outside and look at the sun, I see one. When I put on my welders mask, and look up, I see one. But when I look through my camera with multiple layers of glass, and reflective surfaces, I see multiple flares and artifacts.

I wonder which I should believe?

This site is supposed to support the idea of denying ignorance. Not use ignorance as a tool to encite panic and doom.

I'm glad we could finally get to the bottom of this.
edit on 4-10-2011 by Demoncreeper because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2011 @ 11:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by flexy123
reply to post by TinkerHaus
 


It's very obviously a lens-flare, you can see that already in the first second of the video.

And you cannot see mercury with the unaided eye or simply pointing a camera at the sun.


It's not a lens flare. The camera moves around and the position of the related dot does not change position in relation to the sun.

If it's a lens flare then maybe the sun itself is a lens flare? Just watch it again.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join