NASA Tries To Hide Comet Impacting The Sun Creating An Explosion

reply to post by Phage
Like I said 'its unlikely' comets have any effect on the sun, but any interaction, however small deserves to be studied.

anyone interested can have a look here..

Nasa wrongly predicted Temple1 collision result..

it means they dont know it all about comets and the Universe

www.abovetopsecret.com...

bare in mind...you cant go wrong with your predictions in astronomy..if you know what your talking about...you cant

The timing of the CME so soon after the comet dove into the sun suggests a link. But what? There is no known mechanism for comets to trigger solar explosions. Before 2011 most solar physicists would have discounted the events of Oct. 1st as pure coincidence--and pure coincidence is still the most likely explanation. Earlier this year, however, the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) watched another sungrazer disintegrate in the sun's atmosphere. On July 5, 2011, the unnamed comet appeared to interact with plasma and magnetic fields in its surroundings as it fell apart. Could a puny comet cause a magnetic instability that might propagate and blossom into a impressive CME? The question is not so crazy as it once seemed to be.

Source: SpaceWeather

"Before 2011 most solar physicists would have discounted the events of Oct. 1st as pure coincidence--and pure coincidence is still the most likely explanation." I thought that was one of the most interesting things said, a small admittance that standard theory may no longer fit.

Originally posted by heineken
Nasa wrongly predicted Temple1 collision result..

it means they dont know it all about comets and the Universe

Where have they claimed that they do?

bare in mind...you cant go wrong with your predictions in astronomy.

yes you can actually - why do you think you cannot?

reply to post by spoor


no you cant..

when your model of the universe predicts something completely different that means that you just have to STFU and listen to others who come up with alternative models...like the EU model

this is what can really top up my nerves..

people who think they are cool defending an old theory of the universe whilst a new model might be the key for giving us the answers the old model of the universe cant even get close to imagine its possible..

EU theory might be the key for space traveling, worm holes, cancer cures, immortality, spirituality, how the universe was really formed, and what was there before the universe, is this the only universe?

until you got the model right..you cant move forward..

this is what can really top up my nerves..

people who think they are cool defending an new theory of the universe whilst a older model might be the key for giving us the answers

EU theory might be the key for curing cancer, finding lost kittens, fixing the hole in the ozone layer, what really happened to Jimmy Hoffa and Elvis's latest address.

You have no understanding of the scientific method

Originally posted by heineken
when your model of the universe predicts something completely different that means that you just have to STFU and listen to others who come up with alternative models...like the EU model

No, you have learnt something so you modify your model - Science does not claim to know everything, nor does it say simply chuck all your understanding out the window and go with a new silly theory not based on abything

The Temple 1 impact was just more violent than what was expected, so if I say there feels to be about 8 eggs in that carton and when I open it there is a full dozen then my whole theory is blown? I don't think so. I love the NASA bashers, like random people on the internet have more credibility than the collective NASA and scientific community, I don't think so.

reply to post by Illustronic


are you serious?



thanks to people like you and religion we are still stuck on this corrupted piece of rock

Originally posted by heineken
are you serious?

All explained by the post

"Why settle for pseudoscience when real science explains it quite well?
Bright flash = lots of photons.
Fine dust = impact ejecta.
No need for EU nonsense."

EU is just nonsense, not something that will give us FTL travel

reply to post by spoor


looool

you're just copying youtube quotes now..pathetic

and i presume that post was written by a sheep still asleep..like many I encountered in this thread



if is was that easy..they would have predicted it..which they didnt

fail

anyway...

there is no need for me to play pong with you..

one day the current model of the universe will be dumped and a new one based on electricity will prevail launching us into deep space and starting for real the space age

reply to post by heineken


What you fail to understand, or try to exaggerate, is when science specialists exclaim they did not expect exactly what was going to occur (which is why they conduct experiments), they are being very specific in calculations they worked up before the experiment took place, and should their numbers be a bit off they they call it a surprise. The base of what they expected was valid, and they got a little more. It's not like the comet hurled some hugh unexpected electrical discharge and damaged the spacecraft or sent out some disrupter field for defense of what it may have seen as an attack, it was just a comet with a burst of very bright and very thin outgas, and loose debris.

reply to post by Illustronic


what you fail to understand that by no way what happened on Temple1 can be explained with the current model of the universe..nor the CME relations with comets

all of which can be easily explained by the new eu model

let the experts do the talking

"It's a mystery to me how comets work at all."
--Donald Brownlee, principal investigator of NASA's Stardust Mission

No phenomenon in the observed Universe has been a source of more continuous surprises than comets. In fact, despite the exterior confidence by astronomers and astrophysicists that "all is well" in mainstream cometology, researchers have been so baffled by unexpected discoveries that conventional comet theory no longer exists! "We have now had four close encounters with comets, and every one of them has thrown astronomers onto their back foot." -Stuart Clark, New Scientist, September 09, 200

Originally posted by heineken
what you fail to understand that by no way what happened on Temple1 can be explained with the current model of the universe.

yes it can, there is no need to make up silly theories to explain it.

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by heineken
what you fail to understand that by no way what happened on Temple1 can be explained with the current model of the universe.

yes it can, there is no need to make up silly theories to explain it.

how do you know that pls?

y dont you post some links?

Relax everyone! its not a discussion if there is only arguing. Now, someone please explain if possible, what effects will the commets bring uppon us? Besides the energy released. Will it be warmer now?

reply to post by DonSergio


its not how the comets are effecting us..

but what message comets are trying to pass on to our deaf scientists

we humans might be on the verge of new exciting discoveries, we might be close in getting the key for all the secrets of the universe..

it might be that we have to re-write physics from scratch based on a new model..an electrical one