posted on Oct, 3 2011 @ 08:49 PM
Protests can get peoples blood up but it's a double edged sword.
The general thought of those such as myself who don't really celebrate mass protest , I believe, is from the outcome of protests all over the world
such as the G20 meetings is that the concept is understood and message starts off with good intentions but they get highjacked by the drop outs and
ill informed. What alot of people don't realise is that the silent voter sees the crap that unfolds and is turned off by the subject.
Mass protests get in the face of the average worker and there is an element of anxiety that goes with it. The only true way to get what most of us
want is through first passive information such as websites, songs and small rallies which are orginised and timed informing people of what's going on
which allows the silent voter to take in the information without the disruption caused by mass protest and then any potential political party who
bases their idiology on the fight against the system already has a following prior to registration as a party.
Change is slow and the rulers of today didn't get there over night. Blocking the streets all over the world is only going to get millions of potential
followers off side. Get in the the ear of the worlds population and not their face.
Yes I know that some of you knee jerk reactionists are going to call me misleading or even an agent of the NWO but I'm not talking to you as there is
no point rather I'm communicating with those who would take time to read these words and ponder what they mean.
edit on 3-10-2011 by steveknows
because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-10-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)