It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Here is who's behind occupy wall street

page: 7
24
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:55 AM
link   
Congratulations! You've discovered who bought a web domain!
I could register the domain ”starwarsforever.com”, doesn't mean I have anything to do with the movies.




posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 04:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by nenothtu

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
OP it's a real stretch to make the claim that Adbusters "owns" OWS, or any of the protests that have been inspired by it. They made a blog post suggesting it, and others have taken it up as a rallying cry.


It has already been shown that the Adbusters campaign was a PR campaign to promote the occupations, not a means of starting them. The infrastructure was already in place before Adbusters "inspired" it, as if out of the blue...

Let's contemplate that series of events for just a moment, shall we?

Who do you suppose "inspired" Adbusters at just the right time?







edit on 2011/10/4 by nenothtu because: (no reason given)



The Ruckus Society is also a part of this. They are professional protestors and go for a number of issues. Ruckus is funded by Tides which is a Soros front.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 04:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rineocerous
Take it easy friends.. nothing wrong with a little due diligence.
To get back on track.. I think the real potential for concern isn't who started ths movement but who might try to influence it or take it over. Already we have Tea Partiers and Dennis Kucinich offering advice.. no doubt CIA/FBI will infiltrate and either try to destroy it though violence or discrediting the movement.. or worse, you have the potential for a leader to rise up from the midst and start steering it in dubious directions.


I don't expect to change your mind, but Dennis is one of the few politicians to not fear. You or I may not agree with all his ideas but he is one of the few who really does believe what he says and believes in the people. Consider him the left's Ron Paul if you will.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 04:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by ChrisF231
As I said before, these are nothing but naive college students being fired up by the usual bunch of Marxist agitators. Their left wing professors probably promised extra points on their next test, or a higher letter grade at the end of the semester if they protested. Next up they will try and get the labor unions to get involved, like what the Soviets did with the factory workers militias in Russia in 1917.

If your a Marxist then fine, but if you want change then try and bring it about via the ballot box - that's the American way. We don't rile up angry mobs and destroy buildings to get our way. We vote at the ballot box.
edit on 4-10-2011 by ChrisF231 because: (no reason given)


And what has that way gotten us? Where has it led us thus far? What good is it to vote when almost everyone agrees that all the canidates left or right are bought and paid for by the corporations that fund their campaigns? Bought and paid for, by wall street. The American way is revolution. This nation was founded on rebellion and standing up to the powers that be. The American way is to stand up and fight for what is right, even if it isn't what's popular. We are no less victims of tyranny today than we were in 1776. Only today, the tyrants are on wall street.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   
Here is who is behind OWS..you op are scared for you visual safety ...things are changing ...stay in the hole and watch



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 05:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by xavi1000
Here is who is behind OWS..you op are scared for you visual safety ...things are changing ...stay in the hole and watch



Too much truth here.

Partisan political rhetoric says:

"Move along, nothing to see here, just a bunch of 'slippery slopes', communism, marxists, leninists, stalin, hitler, and other myth-labels tacked on that my group-think subscribes to"
edit on 5-10-2011 by Partisanity because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 05:18 AM
link   
But there are lots of OWS sites why have you singled this one out...



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 05:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by purplemer
But there are lots of OWS sites why have you singled this one out...


Only brings up the ones that he dug up to support the conclusion that he happily subscribed to after being blissfully fed it by other propagandist(s).



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by xavi1000
 


That...is one person, and one reason for the Occupy movement.
This!
This is what the 99% is.
This is what the Occupy movement is about.
It is a social movement, not a socialist one.
It's a people issue, not a partisan one.
There is no central leadership behind the idea, because the idea is a human one.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 05:42 AM
link   
The registrant listed as a domain owner on a whois lookup, isn't necessarily the owner of the website.

Sure, they may be a friend, or a colleague related to the actual owner in some way. But simply having a name registered under a domain linked to an activity or movement doesn't mean they are part of it.

Besides, many people have the same name, where is your source for the background info on these people? If it obtained form a google search, then they could easily be the wrong person.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 06:16 AM
link   
reply to post by illuminatislave
 


If it walks, quacks, and acts like a duck....

it might be a communist.


Why oh why would you be so quick to defend communism?



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 06:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Anonymous has no leader, and no one is behind it, except everyone.



If you believe that i have some swamp land in arizona to sell ya.

NO display like this is entirely without leadership or goals.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 06:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rineocerous
reply to post by anglodemonicmatrix
 


I'm still shocked that just because Beck is a loudmouth people seem to think he also knows what he is talking about. ::sigh::


On Beck.

You have 2 choices on his notice about this crap going on.

1. He is "in" the entire system and knew about it from the highest levels prior to execution
(including the chaos in the mideast).

2. He researched/has a "deep throat" that has given key information.

Beck has been pretty much spot on as far as situations and locations for these socialist "love ins".

Look hard enough and I"ll guarantee that Bill Ayers is somewhere in this crap. Francis Piven has already shown her wrinkled head.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 06:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by felonius

Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Anonymous has no leader, and no one is behind it, except everyone.



If you believe that i have some swamp land in arizona to sell ya.

NO display like this is entirely without leadership or goals.


Now that sir is a FACT! The further fact that they are desperately trying to keep both the directors and goals in the shadows speaks volumes, and should be ringing alarm bells off the hooks.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 07:03 AM
link   
reply to post by stereotype
 


Very interesting thing here you have brought up.
Whether accurate or inacurrate, it does not matter.
The message is getting out, that people are fed up. (LOL, did I make a pun?)
If I do not like what the protestors are doing on wall street, by the same idea, should I think that all who were woken by "Scare em all Al Jones" are dishonest?
I think the thing we need to realize and capitalize on is, "The cat's outta the bag"!
The end will justify the means sometimes.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 10:34 AM
link   
Boy oh boy one really has to sift threw the dross of this movement ....Its kind of hard for us plebs that have only been given the tools to entrapt us.....I would say we see some throwing s^%#*( at some and hey some s&**^% seems to stick.no one seems to have all the true answers but ,contemplating the many arms and tentacles tptb have and are ready to swing into action before these confrontations occur makes it very hard to combat ...wow is me .....here have a listen to Dr.Tarpley ....He does stop Alex at times and rightly so ...Alex can have some of that s^*&(% stick to him quite easily ...so here have a listen ... Webster G. Tarpley on Infowars Nightly News tarpley.net...



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by the2ofusr1
Boy oh boy one really has to sift threw the dross of this movement ....Its kind of hard for us plebs that have only been given the tools to entrapt us.....I would say we see some throwing s^%#*( at some and hey some s&**^% seems to stick.no one seems to have all the true answers but ,contemplating the many arms and tentacles tptb have and are ready to swing into action before these confrontations occur makes it very hard to combat ...wow is me .....here have a listen to Dr.Tarpley ....He does stop Alex at times and rightly so ...Alex can have some of that s^*&(% stick to him quite easily ...so here have a listen ... Webster G. Tarpley on Infowars Nightly News tarpley.net...


No you don't, it is simple.

The elites money paid for it, proven by the Tides Foundation involvement

The Communist professional Protest groups did the groundwork with the money, denying their involvement is impossible.

Anonymous did the advertising campaign.

You got George Soros, self professed Globalist in multitudes of quotes saying America has to go, supporting this openly.

You got clueless sheeple running around the streets at the protests thinking it is their baby.

Now what is so hard to grasp? Are you one of the sheeple who cling to the hope that this is real, blind to every glaring fact, ignorant of the truth? If you are then it might be hard.

I noticed the Left politicos want to turn this into their own sides Tea Party, they are just as clueless with desperate blinders on.

In a nutshell, this is Globalism on the march.
edit on 5-10-2011 by TinfoilTP because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by InsideYourMind
The registrant listed as a domain owner on a whois lookup, isn't necessarily the owner of the website.

Sure, they may be a friend, or a colleague related to the actual owner in some way. But simply having a name registered under a domain linked to an activity or movement doesn't mean they are part of it.

Besides, many people have the same name, where is your source for the background info on these people? If it obtained form a google search, then they could easily be the wrong person.



Well, a bit far reaching, but, say if adbusters registers a domain, but paid for with Soros donations....hmmm you could have something there yet....



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by TinfoilTP
 


It's definitely globalist but with overtones of anarchism and collectivism both.



posted on Oct, 5 2011 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by felonius

Originally posted by Rineocerous
reply to post by anglodemonicmatrix
 


I'm still shocked that just because Beck is a loudmouth people seem to think he also knows what he is talking about. ::sigh::


On Beck.

You have 2 choices on his notice about this crap going on.

1. He is "in" the entire system and knew about it from the highest levels prior to execution
(including the chaos in the mideast).

2. He researched/has a "deep throat" that has given key information.

Beck has been pretty much spot on as far as situations and locations for these socialist "love ins".

Look hard enough and I"ll guarantee that Bill Ayers is somewhere in this crap. Francis Piven has already shown her wrinkled head.



David Horowitz, former leftist radical in the 60's is a source for knowing what is going on in the radical sphere. He is now on the conservative side. He exposes Soros and his front groups.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join