Evidence For Awlaki's Participation In Terrorist Plots?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 3-10-2011 @ 03:02 PM by TupacShakur
This is a video of Jake Tapper interviewing Jay Carney, a member of the Obama Administration, regarding the Awlaki assassination.



During the discussion, the subject of Awlaki's participation in the plotting of the Christmas underwear bombing and other terrorist attacks was brought up. Tapper asks whether or not any evidence of these "well-established" accusations will be presented to the public, and Carney basically says no. Make of that what you will. It's likely that there are file cabinets filled with documents linking Awlaki to these terrorist attacks, but whether that's true or not, it seems that they won't be released to the public.
edit on 3-10-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post



reply posted on 3-10-2011 @ 03:13 PM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by TupacShakur



We should believe it because they said so...

Well that is the reasoning behind their lies anyways

I would like to see the evidence they have that ties him to the underwear bomber. Most people probably believe the same that I do. Which is that there is no evidence.


reply posted on 3-10-2011 @ 03:16 PM by TupacShakur
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



Well he says that there are as far as he knows no terrorist experts in the field who would doubt Awlaki's participation, so it sounds like he's undoubtedly a terrorist based on that. But when he says that no evidence will be presented to the public backing up his participation in those plots, that's what rubs me suspicious. Maybe if some of these experts came public (if they haven't already) and said "Look, this guy was obviously a terrorist and we've known for a while. Here's how we know...", that would be good.

But just saying "Yeah, people in the government know he's bad, so we violated the Constitution and killed him." doesn't quite cut it for me and many others.
edit on 3-10-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post




reply posted on 3-10-2011 @ 03:20 PM by Praetorius
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to
post by Corruption Exposed

Well he says that there are as far as he knows no terrorist experts in the field who would doubt Awlaki's participation, so it sounds like he's undoubtedly a terrorist based on that. But when he says that no evidence will be presented to the public backing up his participation in those plots, that's what rubs me suspicious.

Don't worry, if they ever sentence or execute any one of us as they see fit, there will likely be a slew of experts having thoroughly analyzed all our online posts and real-world interactions to certify that we were valid threats as well - supposedly.

Justified, see?


reply posted on 3-10-2011 @ 04:03 PM by MrWendal
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to
post by Corruption Exposed



Well he says that there are as far as he knows no terrorist experts in the field who would doubt Awlaki's participation, so it sounds like he's undoubtedly a terrorist based on that. But when he says that no evidence will be presented to the public backing up his participation in those plots, that's what rubs me suspicious. Maybe if some of these experts came public (if they haven't already) and said "Look, this guy was obviously a terrorist and we've known for a while. Here's how we know...", that would be good.

But just saying "Yeah, people in the government know he's bad, so we violated the Constitution and killed him." doesn't quite cut it for me and many others.
edit on 3-10-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post


As far as the Christmas underwear bomber, Awlaki was not the "well dressed man" who escorted the underwear bomber onto the plane. I also highly doubt that Awlaki had the authority to get airport staff to violate their own security policies and procedures. What is important to remember here is that this Administration can say anything it wants because dead men tell no tales.


reply posted on 3-10-2011 @ 07:32 PM by TupacShakur
reply to post by MrWendal



As far as the Christmas underwear bomber, Awlaki was not the "well dressed man" who escorted the underwear bomber onto the plane.
I'm sure that was just a covert CIA member shadowing the organization in order to confirm that Awlaki was indeed a terrorist.

I also highly doubt that Awlaki had the authority to get airport staff to violate their own security policies and procedures. What is important to remember here is that this Administration can say anything it wants because dead men tell no tales.
Well as of right now it seems that we're not going to see any evidence connecting Awlaki to that plot, so all we have to go on is the word of the government...
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 18 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags