It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
this is the plane that went down shortly after 9/11 correct ? I just thought it interesting that;
9/11. official story = AQ did it. ergo, around here, the CIA did it
flight 587. official story = accident. ergo, around here, it was AQ
so is AQ legit or not ?
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
so did AQ pull off 9/11 and 587, or just 587 ?
It seems like arond here, the POV taken on them is whatever is kewl or contrary to the establisment.
I'm just looking for a little consistency, thats all
...
here's a potential scenario.
they needed to take out a person or group of people who were on that plane. perhaps some whistleblower or group was threatening to squeal.
they couldn't blame AQ, because of the attention that would be focused on the plane and the mechanics of the crash, which would in turn, point to foul play.
maybe it was a real terrorist shoe bomber, and the sheer EMBARASSMENT factor caused them to cover-up the truth(they never expected a real, bonafide, terrorist).
i think whatever happened, it was no natural accident.
there is a pattern in plane crashes. they seem to happen in uncommonly high occurence on certain dates. this says, "illuminati" to me.
[edit on 12-10-2005 by billybob]