posted on Oct, 12 2005 @ 12:41 PM
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
this is the plane that went down shortly after 9/11 correct ? I just thought it interesting that;
9/11. official story = AQ did it. ergo, around here, the CIA did it
flight 587. official story = accident. ergo, around here, it was AQ
so is AQ legit or not ?
AQ is a universal scapegoat and blanket excuse for government to do whatever the hell it wants.
i don't think it was AQ that brought this plane down. i think it was the shadow government. the same as it was the shadow government that pulled
off 911, using/blaming AQ.
the reason they SAID this second one is an accident is speculation built on speculation.
here's a potential scenario.
they needed to take out a person or group of people who were on that plane. perhaps some whistleblower or group was threatening to squeal.
they couldn't blame AQ, because of the attention that would be focused on the plane and the mechanics of the crash, which would in turn, point to
maybe it was a real terrorist shoe bomber, and the sheer EMBARASSMENT factor caused them to cover-up the truth(they never expected a real, bonafide,
i think whatever happened, it was no natural accident.
there is a pattern in plane crashes. they seem to happen in uncommonly high occurence on certain dates. this says, "illuminati" to me.
[edit on 12-10-2005 by billybob]